wow-inequalities/02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/14f77858bb4e32e55a26ef5032733983-pinto-andrew-d.-and/info.yaml

145 lines
4.8 KiB
YAML

abstract: 'Background Persistent income inequality, the increase in precarious
employment, the inadequacy of many welfare systems, and economic impact
of the COVID-19 pandemic have increased interest in Basic Income (BI)
interventions. Ensuring that social interventions, such as BI, are
evaluated appropriately is key to ensuring their overall effectiveness.
This systematic review therefore aims to report on available methods and
domains of assessment, which have been used to evaluate BI
interventions. These findings will assist in informing future program
and research development and implementation. Methods Studies were
identified through systematic searches of the indexed and grey
literature (Databases included: Scopus, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Web of
Science, ProQuest databases, EBSCOhost Research Databases, and
PsycINFO), hand-searching reference lists of included studies, and
recommendations from experts. Citations were independently reviewed by
two study team members. We included studies that reported on methods
used to evaluate the impact of BI, incorporated primary data from an
observational or experimental study, or were a protocol for a future BI
study. We extracted information on the BI intervention, context and
evaluation method. Results 86 eligible articles reported on 10 distinct
BI interventions from the last six decades. Workforce participation was
the most common outcome of interest among BI evaluations in the
1960-1980 era. During the 2000s, studies of BI expanded to include
outcomes related to health, educational attainment, housing and other
key facets of life impacted by individuals'' income. Many BI
interventions were tested in randomized controlled trials with data
collected through surveys at multiple time points. Conclusions Over the
last two decades, the assessment of the impact of BI interventions has
evolved to include a wide array of outcomes. This shift in evaluation
outcomes reflects the current hypothesis that investing in BI can result
in lower spending on health and social care. Methods of evaluation
ranged but emphasized the use of randomization, surveys, and existing
data sources (i.e., administrative data). Our findings can inform future
BI intervention studies and interventions by providing an overview of
how previous BI interventions have been evaluated and commenting on the
effectiveness of these methods. Registration This systematic review was
registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42016051218).'
affiliation: 'Pinto, AD (Corresponding Author), Unity Hlth Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge
Inst, MAP Ctr Urban Hlth Solut, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pinto, AD (Corresponding Author), St Michaels Hosp, Dept Family \& Community Med,
Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pinto, Andrew D.; Perri, Melissa; Pedersen, Cheryl L.; Aratangy, Tatiana; Hapsari,
Ayu Pinky; Hwang, Stephen W., Unity Hlth Toronto, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, MAP
Ctr Urban Hlth Solut, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pinto, Andrew D., St Michaels Hosp, Dept Family \& Community Med, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Pinto, Andrew D., Univ Toronto, Dept Family \& Community Med, Fac Med, Toronto,
ON, Canada.
Pinto, Andrew D.; Perri, Melissa; Hwang, Stephen W., Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch
Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hwang, Stephen W., Univ Toronto, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada.'
article-number: '142'
author: Pinto, Andrew D. and Perri, Melissa and Pedersen, Cheryl L. and Aratangy,
Tatiana and Hapsari, Ayu Pinky and Hwang, Stephen W.
author-email: andrew.pinto@utoronto.ca
author_list:
- family: Pinto
given: Andrew D.
- family: Perri
given: Melissa
- family: Pedersen
given: Cheryl L.
- family: Aratangy
given: Tatiana
- family: Hapsari
given: Ayu Pinky
- family: Hwang
given: Stephen W.
da: '2023-09-28'
doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01479-2
eissn: 1475-9276
files: []
journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH
keywords: 'Basic income; Income inequality; Social determinants of health;
Methodology; Health; Equity'
keywords-plus: 'LABOR-SUPPLY RESPONSE; GRADUATED WORK INCENTIVES; GUARANTEED ANNUAL
INCOME; EXPERIMENTAL PANEL-DATA; TAX PROGRAMS; MAINTENANCE EXPERIMENTS;
MARITAL DISSOLUTION; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS; SCHOOL PERFORMANCE; CASH
TRANSFERS'
language: English
month: JUN 16
number: '1'
number-of-cited-references: '126'
orcid-numbers: Pinto, Andrew/0000-0003-1841-9347
papis_id: c0ca1578b5942c458cb0b96dc1c553ad
ref: Pinto2021exploringdifferent
researcherid-numbers: 'Hwang, Stephen W./GVR-7773-2022
'
tags:
- relevant
- review
times-cited: '4'
title: 'Exploring different methods to evaluate the impact of basic income interventions:
a systematic review'
type: article
unique-id: WOS:000664609300003
usage-count-last-180-days: '3'
usage-count-since-2013: '9'
volume: '20'
web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health
year: '2021'