feat(script): Extract Hardoy2015

02-data/processed/relevant/Hardoy2015.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+author: Hardoy, I., & Schøne, P. 
+year: 2015
+title: "Enticing even higher female labor supply: The impact of cheaper day care" 
+publisher: Review of Economics of the Household
+uri: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9215-8
+pubtype: article
+discipline: economics
+
+country: Norway
+period: 1995-2006
+maxlength: 48
+targeting: implicit
+group: mothers
+data: Norwegian Labor and Welfare Service (NAV); Register for Employers and Employees
+
+design: quasi-experimental
+method: triple-difference approach
+sample: 200_530
+unit: individual
+representativeness: national
+causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
+
+theory:
+limitations: simultaneous capacity extension may bias results
+observation:
+  - intervention: subsidy (child care)
+    institutional: 1
+    structural: 1
+    agency: 0
+    inequality: gender; education; migration
+    type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
+    indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
+    measures: employment probability
+    findings: child care price reduction increased female labour supply (about 5pct); no impact on mothers already participating in labour market; stronger impact on low-education mothers, low-income households; no significant impact on immigrant mothers
+    channels: day care expenditure larger part of low-income/-education households creating larger impact; may also be due to average lower employment rates for those households
+    direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
+    significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
+
+notes:
+annotation: |
+  A study on the labour force impacts for women of reductions in child care costs in Norway.
+  It finds that overall the reductions in child care cost increased the female labour supply in the country (by about 5 per cent),
+  while there were no significant impacts on mothers which already participated in the labour market.
+  It also finds some internal heterogeneity, with the impact being strongest for low-education mothers and low-income households,
+  a finding the authors expected due to day care expenditure representing a larger part of those households' budgets thus creating a larger impact.
+  Though it may alternatively also be generated by the lower average pre-intervention employment rate for those households.
+  Interestingly when disaggregating by native and immigrant mothers there is only a significant impact on native mothers,
+  though the authors do not form an inference on why this difference would be.
+  A limitation of the study is that there was a simultaneous child care capacity increase in the country,
+  which may bias the labour market results due to being affected by both the cost reduction and the capacity increase.