professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

fix(script): Correct findings summary table headings

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2024-02-18 19:02:42 +01:00
parent 51b747a058
commit ebc7724f57
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
1 changed files with 25 additions and 7 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

32
scoping_review.qmd
View file

@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ def strength_for(val):
findings_institutional = pd.read_csv("02-data/supplementary/findings-institutional.csv")
fd_df = validity.add_to_findings(findings_institutional, by_intervention, study_strength_bins)
md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy", "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers="keys", tablefmt="grid"))
md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy", "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers=["area of policy", "internal strength", "external strength", "main findings", "channels"], tablefmt="grid"))
```
Note: Each main finding is presented with an internal strength of evidence and an external strength of evidence which describe the combined validities of the evidence base for the respective finding.
@ -840,12 +840,14 @@ One limitation of the study is the modelling assumption that workers will have t
from src.model import validity
findings_structural = pd.read_csv("02-data/supplementary/findings-structural.csv")
fd_df = validity.add_to_findings(findings_structural, by_intervention)
fd_df = validity.add_to_findings(findings_structural, by_intervention, study_strength_bins)
md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy", "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers="keys", tablefmt="grid"))
md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy", "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers=["area of policy", "internal strength", "external strength", "main findings", "channels"], tablefmt="grid"))
```
Note: Each main finding is presented with an internal strength of evidence and an external strength of evidence which describe the combined validities of the evidence base for the respective finding. Validities are binned to a weak (-) evidence base up to a validity rank of 2.9, evidential (+) between 3.0 and 5.9 and strong evidence base (++) above 6.0.
Note: Each main finding is presented with an internal strength of evidence and an external strength of evidence which describe the combined validities of the evidence base for the respective finding.
Validities are segmented to a weak (-) evidence base under a validity ranking of `{python} strength_for(r"\+")`,
evidential (+) from `{python} strength_for(r"\+")` and under `{python} strength_for(r"\++")` and strong evidence base (++) for `{python} strength_for(r"\++")` and above.
Summary of main findings for structural policies
@ -1075,12 +1077,14 @@ Though the intervention clearly aims at strengthening some aspect of individual
from src.model import validity
findings_agency = pd.read_csv("02-data/supplementary/findings-agency.csv")
fd_df = validity.add_to_findings(findings_agency, by_intervention)
fd_df = validity.add_to_findings(findings_agency, by_intervention, study_strength_bins)
md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy", "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers="keys", tablefmt="grid"))
md(tabulate(fd_df[["area of policy", "internal_validity", "external_validity", "findings", "channels"]].fillna(""), showindex=False, headers=["area of policy", "internal strength", "external strength", "main findings", "channels"], tablefmt="grid"))
```
Note: Each main finding is presented with an internal strength of evidence and an external strength of evidence which describe the combined validities of the evidence base for the respective finding. Validities are binned to a weak (-) evidence base up to a validity rank of 2.9, evidential (+) between 3.0 and 5.9 and strong evidence base (++) above 6.0.
Note: Each main finding is presented with an internal strength of evidence and an external strength of evidence which describe the combined validities of the evidence base for the respective finding.
Validities are segmented to a weak (-) evidence base under a validity ranking of `{python} strength_for(r"\+")`,
evidential (+) from `{python} strength_for(r"\+")` and under `{python} strength_for(r"\++")` and strong evidence base (++) for `{python} strength_for(r"\++")` and above.
Summary of main findings for agency-based policies
@ -1225,6 +1229,20 @@ def regions_for_inequality(df, inequality:str):
return sns.countplot(df_temp, x="region", order=df_temp["region"].value_counts().index)
```
```{python}
#| label: fig-validity
from src.model import validity
validities = validity.calculate(by_intervention)
validities["identifier"] = validities["author"].str.replace(r',.*$', '', regex=True) + " (" + validities["year"].astype(str) + ")"
g = sns.PairGrid(validities[["internal_validity", "external_validity", "identifier"]].drop_duplicates(subset="identifier"),
x_vars=["internal_validity", "external_validity"], y_vars = ["identifier"]
)
# Create a stacked histplot using Seaborn
#sns.scatterplot(data=validities, x='external_validity', y='internal_validity', hue='intervention')
```
Policy interventions undertaken either with the explicit aim of reducing one or multiple inequalities, or analysed under the lens of such an aim implicitly, appear in a wide array of variations to their approach and primary targeted inequality, as was highlighted in the previous section.
To make further sense of the studies shining a light on such approaches, it makes sense to divide their attention not just by primary approach, but by individual or overlapping inequalities being targeted, as well as the region of their operation.