professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

chore(data): Move snowball DOIs into Zotero

Browse source 
Integrated all new snowballing DOIs into Zotero to be screened and
extracted.
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2024-01-10 14:43:47 +01:00
parent e3d4882593
commit de5bc68836
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
125 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

0
02-data/raw/02_snowballing-starts/Nandi2018/115-of-118 Normal file
View file

372
02-data/raw/02_snowballing-starts/Nandi2018/DOIs.txt Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
1. Hegewisch A, Gornick JC. The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: a review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family. 2011;14(2):119-138.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2011.571395
 
2. Burtle A, Bezruchka S. Population health and paid parental leave: what the United States can learn from two decades of research. Paper presented at: Healthcare 2016.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4020030
 
3. Rossin-Slater M, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J. The effects of California's paid family leave program on mothers' leave-taking and subsequent labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2013;32(2):224-245.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21676
 
4. Borrell C, Palencia L, Muntaner C, Urquia M, Malmusi D, O'Campo P. Influence of macrosocial policies on women's health and gender inequalities in health. Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36: 31-48.
https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxt002
 
5. Alio AP, Bond MJ, Padilla YC, Heidelbaugh JJ, Lu M, Parker WJ. Addressing policy barriers to paternal involvement during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(4):425-430.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0781-1
 
6. Aitken Z, Garrett CC, Hewitt B, Keogh L, Hocking JS, Kavanagh AM. The maternal health outcomes of paid maternity leave: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:32-41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.001
 
7. O'Brien M. Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: international perspectives and policy impact. Ann Am Acad Polit SS. 2009;624:190-213.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209334349
 
8. Heymann J, Rho HJ, Schmitt J, Earle A. Ensuring a healthy and productive workforce: comparing the generosity of paid sick day and sick leave policies in 22 countries. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(1):1-22.
https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.40.1.a
 
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
 
10. Ulker A, Guven C. Determinants of maternity leave duration in Australia: evidence from the HILDA survey. Econ Rec. 2011;87(278):399-413.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00729.x
 
11. Baird M, Litwin AS. Rethinking work and family policy: the making and taking of parental leave in Australia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005;17(5):385-400.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260500238306
 
12. Baum CL, Ruhm CJ. The effects of paid family leave in California on labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2016;35(2):333356. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894
 
13. Raabe PH, Theall KP. An analysis of paid family and sick leave advocacy in Louisiana: lessons learned. Womens Health Issues. 2016;26(5):488-495.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.07.003
 
14. Baker M, Milligan K. How does job-protected maternity leave affect mothers' employment? J Labor Econ. 2008;26(4):655-691. WORLD Policy Analysis Center. OECD Adult Labor Database. 2016. https://www.worldpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/ WORLD%20Report%20-%20Parental%20Leave%20OECD% 20Country%20Approaches_0.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1086/591955
 
15. Berger LM, Hill J, Waldfogel J. Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F29-F47.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00971.x
 
16. Huang R, Yang MZ. Paid maternity leave and breastfeeding practice before and after California's implementation of the nation's first paid family leave program. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;16:45-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.009
 
18. Escot L, Fernandez-Cornejo JA, Poza C. Fathers' use of childbirth leave in Spain: the effects of the 13-day paternity leave. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014;33(3):419-453.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9304-7
 
19. Cools S, Fiva JH, Kirkeboen LJ. Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. Scand J Econ. 2015;117(3):801-828.
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12113
 
20. Ekberg J, Eriksson R, Friebel G. Parental leave-a policy evaluation of the Swedish "daddy-month" reform. J Public Econ. 2013;97:131-143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.001
 
21. Bunning M. What happens after the 'daddy months'? Fathers' involvement in paid work, childcare, and housework after taking parental leave in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2015;31(6): 738-748.
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv072
 
22. Lidwall U. Termination of sickness benefits or transition to disability pension after changes in sickness insurance: a Swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(2):118-124.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.689920
 
23. Lidwall U, Marklund S. Trends in long-term sickness absence in Sweden, 1992-2008: the role of economic conditions, legislation, demography, work environment and alcohol consumption. Int J Soc Welf. 2011;20(2):167-179.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00744.x
 
24. Hägglund P. Do time limits in the sickness insurance system increase return to work? Empir Econ. 2013;45(1):567-582.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0618-9
 
25. Arrelov B, Borgquist L, Ljungberg D, Svardsudd K. The influence of change of legislation concerning sickness absence on physicians' performance as certifiers: a population-based study. Health Policy. 2003;63(3):259-268.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00081-7
 
26. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Sickness benefit cuts mainly affect bluecollar workers. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(6):497-503.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814538559
 
27. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Influence of the sickness benefit reform on sickness absence. Health Policy. 2016;120(9):1070-1078.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.07.014
 
28. De Paola M, Scoppa V, Pupo V. Absenteeism in the Italian public sector: the effects of changes in sick leave policy. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):337-360.
https://doi.org/10.1086/674986
 
29. Kausto J, Viikari-Juntura E, Virta LJ, Gould R, Koskinen A, Solovieva S. Effectiveness of new legislation on partial sickness benefit on work participation: a quasi-experiment in Finland. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e006685.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006685
 
30. Kausto J, Miranda H, Martimo KP, Viikari-Juntura E. Partial sick leave: review of its use, effects and feasibility in the Nordic countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34(4):239249.
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1266
 
31. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. The effects of expanding the generosity of the statutory sickness insurance system. J Appl Econ. 2014;29(2):208-230.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2317
 
32. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. A natural experiment on sick pay cuts, sickness absence, and labor costs. J Public Econ. 2010;94(11):1108-1122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.001
 
33. Fevang E, Markussen S, Røed K. The sick pay trap. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):305-336.
https://doi.org/10.1086/673400
 
34. Schuster MA, Chung PJ, Elliott MN, Garfield CF, Vestal KD, Klein DJ. Awareness and use of California's Paid Family Leave Insurance among parents of chronically ill children. JAMA. 2008;300(9):1047-1055.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.9.1047
 
35. Baum CL. The effect of state maternity leave legislation and the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act on employment and wages. Labour Econ. 2003;10(5):573-596.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00037-X
 
36. Goodpaster NK. Leaves and leaving: the Family and Medical Leave Act and the decline in maternal labor force participation. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1).
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1996
 
37. Han WJ, Waldfogel J. Parental leave: the impact of recent legislation on parents' leave taking. Demography. 2003;40(1):191-200.
https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0003
 
38. Rossin M. The effects of maternity leave on children's birth and infant health outcomes in the United States. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):221-239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.005
 
39. Schott W. Going back part-time: family leave legislation and women's return to work. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2012;31(1):1-30.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-011-9221-6
 
40. Hofferth SL, Curtin SC. Parental leave statutes and maternal return to work after childbirth in the United States. Work Occup. 2006;33(1):73-105.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888405281889
 
41. Waldfogel J. The impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act. J Policy Anal Manage. 1999;18(2):281-302.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199921)18:2<281::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-J
 
42. Baum CL. The effects of maternity leave legislation on mothers' labor supply after childbirth. South Econ J. 2003;69(4):772-799.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2003.tb00533.x
 
43. Waldfogel J. Family leave coverage in the 1990s. Mon Labor Rev. 1999;122(10):13-21.
 
44. Washbrook E, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J, Han W-J. Public policies, women's employment after childbearing, and child well-being. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2011;11(1).
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2938
 
45. Stoddard C, Stock WA, Hogenson E. The impact of maternity leave laws on cesarean delivery. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2016;16(1).
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2015-0015
 
46. Shim J. Family leave policy and child mortality: evidence from 19 OECD countries from 1969 to 2010. Int J Soc Welf. 2016;25(3):215-221.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12186
 
47. Tanaka S. Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F7-F28.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00970.x
 
48. Ruhm CJ. Parental leave and child health. J Health Econ. 2000;19(6):931-960.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00047-3
 
49. Schober PS. Parental leave and domestic work of mothers and fathers: a longitudinal study of two reforms in West Germany. J Soc Policy. 2014;43(2):351-372.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000809
 
50. Lapuerta I, Baizán P, González MJ. Individual and institutional constraints: an analysis of parental leave use and duration in Spain. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2011;30(2):185-210.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9185-y
 
51. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
 
52. Dustmann C, Schonberg U. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and children's long-term outcomes. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012;4(3):190-224.
https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.3.190
 
53. Rege M, Solli IF. The impact of paternity leave on fathers' future earnings. Demography. 2013;50(6):2255-2277.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0233-1
 
54. Han WJ, Ruhm C, Waldfogel J. Parental leave policies and parents' employment and leave-taking. J Policy Anal Manage. 2009;28(1):29-54.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20398
 
55. Pronzato CD. Return to work after childbirth: does parental leave matter in Europe? Rev Econ Househ. 2009;7(4):341-360.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9059-4
 
56. Schonberg U, Ludsteck J. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers' labor market outcomes after childbirth. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(3):469-505.
https://doi.org/10.1086/675078
 
57. Hanel B. The impact of paid maternity leave rights on labour market outcomes. Econ Rec. 2013;89(286):339-366.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12057
 
58. Geyer J, Haan P, Wrohlich K. The effects of family policy on maternal labor supply: combining evidence from a structural model and a quasi-experimental approach. Labour Econ. 2015;36: 84-98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.07.001
 
59. Ziefle A, Gangl M. Do women respond to changes in family policy? A quasi-experimental study of the duration of mothers' employment interruptions in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2014;30(5):562-581.
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu056
 
60. Ronsen M, Sundstrom M. Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers: a comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. Eur J Popul. 2002;18(2):121-152.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015532305179
 
61. Hanratty M, Trzcinski E. Who benefits from paid family leave? Impact of expansions in Canadian paid family leave on maternal employment and transfer income. J Popul Econ. 2009;22(3):693711.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-008-0211-x
 
62. Matysiak A, Szalma I. Effects of parental leave policies on second birth risks and women's employment entry. Population. 2014;69(4):599-636.
 
63. Bergemann A, Riphahn RT. Female labour supply and parental leave benefits-the causal effect of paying higher transfers for a shorter period of time. Appl Econ Lett. 2010;18(1):17-20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850903425173
 
64. Geyer J, Haan P, Spieß CK, Wrohlich K. Das Elterngeld und seine Wirkungen auf das Haushaltseinkommen junger Familien und die Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern [The new German parental leave benefit scheme and its effects on young families' household income and on mothers' paid employment]. ZfF-Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2): 193-211.
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-153
 
65. Bujard M, Passet J. Wirkungen des Elterngelds auf Einkommen und Fertilität [Effects of the new German parental leave benefit on income and fertility]. ZfF-Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2):212-237.
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-154
 
66. Winegarden CR, Bracy PM. Demographic consequences of maternal-leave programs in industrial countries: evidence from fixed-effects models. South Econ J. 1995;61(4):1020-1035.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1060738
 
67. Brugiavini A, Pasini G, Trevisan E. The direct impact of maternity benefits on leave taking: evidence from complete fertility histories. Adv Life Course Res. 2013;18(1):46-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.10.003
 
68. Akgunduz YE, Plantenga J. Labour market effects of parental leave in Europe. Cambridge J Econ. 2013;37(4):845-862.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes052
 
69. Ruhm CJ. The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: lessons from Europe. Q J Econ. 1998;113(1):285-317.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555586
 
70. Lalive R, Schlosser A, Steinhauer A, Zweimüller J. Parental leave and mothers' careers: the relative importance of job protection and cash benefits. Rev Econ Stud. 2014;81(1):219-265.
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt028
 
71. Asai Y. Parental leave reforms and the employment of new mothers: quasi-experimental evidence from Japan. Labour Econ. 2015;36:72-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.007
 
72. Waldfogel J. The family gap for young women in the United States and Britain: can maternity leave make a difference? J Labor Econ. 1998;16(3):505-545.
https://doi.org/10.1086/209897
 
73. Waldfogel J, Higuchi Y, Abe M. Family leave policies and women's retention after childbirth: evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. J Popul Econ. 1999;12(4):523-545.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050112
 
74. Kluve J, Tamm M. Parental leave regulations, mothers' labor force attachment and fathers' childcare involvement: evidence from a natural experiment. J Popul Econ. 2013;26(3):9831005.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0404-1
 
75. Del Boca D, Pasqua S, Pronzato C. Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective. Oxf Econ Pap. 2009;61(Suppl. 1):i147-i171.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn046
 
76. Mukhopadhyay S. The effects of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act on female labor supply. Int Econ Rev. 2012;53(4):11331153.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00714.x
 
77. Das T, Polachek SW. Unanticipated effects of California's paid family leave program. Contemp Econ Policy. 2015;33(4):619-635.
https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12102
 
78. Lalive R, Zweimuller J. How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. Q J Econ. 2009;124(3):1363-1402.
https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1363
 
79. Joseph O, Pailhe A, Recotillet I, Solaz A. The economic impact of taking short parental leave: evaluation of a French reform. Labour Econ. 2013;25:63-75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.04.012
 
80. Rasmussen AW. Increasing the length of parents' birth-related leave: the effect on children's long-term educational outcomes. Labour Econ. 2010;17(1):91-100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.07.007
 
81. Maldonado LC, Nieuwenhuis R. Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978-2008. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(4):395-415.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1080661
 
82. Misra J, Moller S, Strader E, Wemlinger E. Family policies, employment and poverty among partnered and single mothers. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2012;30(1):113-128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2011.12.001
 
83. Stier H, Mandel H. Inequality in the family: the institutional aspects of women's earning contribution. Soc Sci Res. 2009;38(3):594-608.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.01.008
 
84. Budig MJ, Misra J, Boeckmann I. Work-family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work Occup. 2016;43(2):119-177.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415615385
 
85. Erhel C, Guergoat-Larivière M. Labor market regimes, family policies, and women's behavior in the EU. Fem Econ. 2013;19(4):76-109.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.842649
 
86. De Henau J, Meulders D, O'Dorchai S. Maybe baby: comparing partnered women's employment and child policies in the EU-15. Fem Econ. 2010;16(1):43-77.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700903382703
 
87. Pettit B, Hook JL. The structure of women's employment in comparative perspective. Social Forces. 2005;84(2):779-801.
https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0029
 
88. Fuwa M, Cohen PN. Housework and social policy. Soc Sci Res. 2007;36(2):512-530.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.005
 
89. Hook JL. Gender inequality in the welfare state: sex segregation in housework, 1965-2003. AJS. 2010;115(5):1480-1523.
https://doi.org/10.1086/651384
 
90. Hook JL. Care in context: men's unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965-2003. Am Soc Rev. 2006;71(4):639-660.
https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100406
 
91. Boll C, Leppin J, Reich N. Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: evidence from industrialized countries. Rev Econ Househ. 2014;12(1):129-158.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9211-z
 
92. Stearns J. The effects of paid maternity leave: evidence from Temporary Disability Insurance. J Health Econ. 2015;43:85-102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.04.005
 
93. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
 
94. Kottwitz A, Oppermann A, Spiess CK. Parental leave benefits and breastfeeding in Germany: effects of the 2007 reform. Rev Econ Househ. 2016;14(4):859-890.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9299-4
 
95. Klevens J, Luo F, Xu L, Peterson C, Latzman NE. Paid family leave's effect on hospital admissions for pediatric abusive head trauma. Inj Prev. 2016;11:11.
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041702
 
96. Daku M, Raub A, Heymann J. Maternal leave policies and vaccination coverage: a global analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(2):120124.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.013
 
97. Liu Q, Skans ON. The duration of paid parental leave and children's scholastic performance. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1):1-35.
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2329
 
98. Baker M, Milligan K. Evidence from maternity leave expansions of the impact of maternal care on early child development. J Hum Resour. 2010;45(1):1-32.
https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2010.0007
 
99. Carneiro P, Løken KV, Salvanes KG. A flying start? Maternity leave benefits and long-run outcomes of children. J Polit Econ. 2015;123(2):365-412.
https://doi.org/10.1086/679627
 
100. Engster D, Stensöta HO. Do family policy regimes matter for children's well-being? Soc Polit. 2011;18(1):82-124.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr006
 
101. Avendano M, Berkman LF, Brugiavini A, Pasini G. The long-run effect of maternity leave benefits on mental health: evidence from European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:45-53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.037
 
102. Duvander A-Z, Johansson M. What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers' parental leave use? J Eur Soc Policy. 2012;22(3):319-330.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440201
 
103. Bünning M, Pollmann-Schult M. Family policies and fathers' working hours: cross-national differences in the paternal labour supply. Work Employ Soc. 2016;30(2):256-274.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015578999
 
104. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: causal effects of paternity leave. Soc Sci Res. 2011;40(6):1611-1622.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.011
 
105. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. Causal effects of parental leave on adolescents' household work. Social Forces. 2013;92(1):329-351.
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot044
 
106. Rønsen M, Kitterød RH. Gender-equalizing family policies and mothers' entry into paid work: recent evidence from Norway. Fem Econ. 2015;21(1):59-89.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.927584
 
107. Dale-Olsen H. Sickness absence, sick leave pay, and pay schemes. Labour. 2014;28(1):40-63.
https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12022
 
108. Hall C, Hartman L. Moral hazard among the sick and unemployed: evidence from a Swedish social insurance reform. Empir Econ. 2010;39(1):27-50.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0293-7
 
109. Henrekson M, Persson M. The effects on sick leave of changes in the sickness insurance system. J Labor Econ. 2004;22(1):87-113.
https://doi.org/10.1086/380404
 
110. Johansson P, Palme M. Assessing the effect of public policy on worker absenteeism. J Hum Resour. 2002;37(2):381-409.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3069652
 
111. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of a sick pay reform on absence and on health-related outcomes. J Health Econ. 2010;29(2):285-302.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.01.003
 
112. Olsson M, Thoursie PS. Sickness insurance and spousal labour supply. Labour Econ. 2015;33:41-54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.005
 
113. Ziebarth NR. Long-term absenteeism and moral hazard: evidence from a natural experiment. Labour Econ. 2013;24:277-292.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.09.004
 
114. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
 
115. Thyrian JR, Fendrich K, Lange A, Haas JP, Zygmunt M, Hoffmann W. Changing maternity leave policy: short-term effects on fertility rates and demographic variables in Germany. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(4):672-676.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.004
 
116. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of parental leave extension on training for young women. J Popul Econ. 2011;24(2):731-760.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0295-y
 
117. Escobedo A, Wall K. Leave policies in Southern Europe: continuities and changes. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(2):218235.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1024822
 
118. Milkman R, Appelbaum E. Unfinished Business: Paid Family Leave in California and the Future of US Work-Family Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2013.
https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801452383.001.0001
 
 
Do not use your browser's 'BACK' button.
Use the 'RESET' button to submit more references.
We now provide space to match 1,000 references per submission
To learn about other services and interfaces see our MetaData Delivery page.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
Tips:
There should be no line breaks within an individual reference.
When submitting multiple references they must be in alphabetical order or presented as a numbered list.
To check the accuracy of a reference, click on the link that is returned with the reference.
You may use any reference style, although it works best if references are formatted in a consistent and standard style. Just cut and paste this example list to try it out:
1. Boucher RC (2004) New concepts of the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis lung disease. Eur Resp J 23: 146–158.
2. Knowles MR, Boucher RC (2002) Mucus clearance as a primary innate defense mechanism for mammalian airways. J Clin Investig 109: 571–577.
3. Antunes MB, Cohen NA (2007) Mucociliary clearance - a critical upper airway host defense mechanism and methods of assessment. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 7: 5–10.
4. Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem BS, Alon N, Rozmahel R, et al. (1989) Identification of the Cystic-Fibrosis Gene - Cloning and Characterization of Complementary-Dna. Science 245: 1066–1072.
5. Rommens JM, Iannuzzi MC, Kerem BS, Drumm ML, Melmer G, et al. (1989) Identification of the Cystic-Fibrosis Gene - Chromosome Walking and Jumping. Science 245: 1059–1065.
6. Bobadilla JL, Macek M, Fine JP, Farrell PM (2002) Cystic fibrosis: A worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations - Correlation with incidence data and application to screening. Human Mutation 19: 575–606.
7. Qu BH, Thomas PJ (1996) Alteration of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator folding pathway - Effects of the Delta F508 mutation on the thermodynamic stability and folding yield of NBD1. J Biol Chem 271: 7261–7264.

115
02-data/raw/02_snowballing-starts/Nandi2018/DOIs_only.txt Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2011.571395
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare4020030
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21676
https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxt002
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0781-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.001
https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209334349
https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.40.1.a
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00729.x
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260500238306
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.07.003
https://doi.org/10.1086/591955
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00971.x
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2013.12.009
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9304-7
https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12113
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.001
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv072
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.689920
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00744.x
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0618-9
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00081-7
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494814538559
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.07.014
https://doi.org/10.1086/674986
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006685
https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1266
https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.09.001
https://doi.org/10.1086/673400
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.9.1047
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5371(03)00037-X
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1996
https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.01.005
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-011-9221-6
https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888405281889
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199921)18:2<281::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-J
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2003.tb00533.x
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2938
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2015-0015
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12186
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.2005.00970.x
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00047-3
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279413000809
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-010-9185-y
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.3.190
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0233-1
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20398
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9059-4
https://doi.org/10.1086/675078
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12057
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.07.001
https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu056
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015532305179
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-008-0211-x
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850903425173
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-153
https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-154
https://doi.org/10.2307/1060738
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.10.003
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes052
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555586
https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt028
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.007
https://doi.org/10.1086/209897
https://doi.org/10.1007/s001480050112
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0404-1
https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpn046
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2012.00714.x
https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12102
https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.3.1363
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.04.012
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.07.007
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1080661
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2011.12.001
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.01.008
https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888415615385
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2013.842649
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700903382703
https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.005
https://doi.org/10.1086/651384
https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100406
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9211-z
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.04.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.02.006
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-015-9299-4
https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041702
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.013
https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2329
https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2010.0007
https://doi.org/10.1086/679627
https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.037
https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712440201
https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015578999
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.011
https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot044
https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.927584
https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0293-7
https://doi.org/10.1086/380404
https://doi.org/10.2307/3069652
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.01.003
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.02.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2013.09.004
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.004
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-009-0295-y
https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1024822
https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9780801452383.001.0001

117
02-data/raw/02_snowballing-starts/Nandi2018/references.txt Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
1. Hegewisch A, Gornick JC. The impact of work-family policies on women’s employment: a review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family. 2011;14(2):119-138.
2. Burtle A, Bezruchka S. Population health and paid parental leave: what the United States can learn from two decades of research. Paper presented at: Healthcare 2016.
3. Rossin-Slater M, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J. The effects of California’s paid family leave program on mothers’ leave-taking and subsequent labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2013;32(2):224-245.
4. Borrell C, Palencia L, Muntaner C, Urquia M, Malmusi D, O’Campo P. Influence of macrosocial policies on women’s health and gender inequalities in health. Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36: 31-48.
5. Alio AP, Bond MJ, Padilla YC, Heidelbaugh JJ, Lu M, Parker WJ. Addressing policy barriers to paternal involvement during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(4):425-430.
6. Aitken Z, Garrett CC, Hewitt B, Keogh L, Hocking JS, Kavanagh AM. The maternal health outcomes of paid maternity leave: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:32-41.
7. O’Brien M. Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: international perspectives and policy impact. Ann Am Acad Polit SS. 2009;624:190-213.
8. Heymann J, Rho HJ, Schmitt J, Earle A. Ensuring a healthy and productive workforce: comparing the generosity of paid sick day and sick leave policies in 22 countries. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(1):1-22.
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.
10. Ulker A, Guven C. Determinants of maternity leave duration in Australia: evidence from the HILDA survey. Econ Rec. 2011;87(278):399-413.
11. Baird M, Litwin AS. Rethinking work and family policy: the making and taking of parental leave in Australia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005;17(5):385-400.
12. Baum CL, Ruhm CJ. The effects of paid family leave in California on labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2016;35(2):333356. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894.
13. Raabe PH, Theall KP. An analysis of paid family and sick leave advocacy in Louisiana: lessons learned. Womens Health Issues. 2016;26(5):488-495.
14. Baker M, Milligan K. How does job-protected maternity leave affect mothers’ employment? J Labor Econ. 2008;26(4):655-691. WORLD Policy Analysis Center. OECD Adult Labor Database. 2016. https://www.worldpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/ WORLD%20Report%20-%20Parental%20Leave%20OECD% 20Country%20Approaches_0.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.
15. Berger LM, Hill J, Waldfogel J. Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F29-F47.
16. Huang R, Yang MZ. Paid maternity leave and breastfeeding practice before and after California’s implementation of the nation’s first paid family leave program. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;16:45-59.
18. Escot L, Fernandez-Cornejo JA, Poza C. Fathers’ use of childbirth leave in Spain: the effects of the 13-day paternity leave. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014;33(3):419-453.
19. Cools S, Fiva JH, Kirkeboen LJ. Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. Scand J Econ. 2015;117(3):801-828.
20. Ekberg J, Eriksson R, Friebel G. Parental leave—a policy evaluation of the Swedish “daddy-month” reform. J Public Econ. 2013;97:131-143.
21. Bunning M. What happens after the ‘daddy months’? Fathers’ involvement in paid work, childcare, and housework after taking parental leave in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2015;31(6): 738-748.
22. Lidwall U. Termination of sickness benefits or transition to disability pension after changes in sickness insurance: a Swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(2):118-124.
23. Lidwall U, Marklund S. Trends in long-term sickness absence in Sweden, 1992–2008: the role of economic conditions, legislation, demography, work environment and alcohol consumption. Int J Soc Welf. 2011;20(2):167-179.
24. Hägglund P. Do time limits in the sickness insurance system increase return to work? Empir Econ. 2013;45(1):567-582.
25. Arrelov B, Borgquist L, Ljungberg D, Svardsudd K. The influence of change of legislation concerning sickness absence on physicians’ performance as certifiers: a population-based study. Health Policy. 2003;63(3):259-268.
26. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Sickness benefit cuts mainly affect bluecollar workers. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(6):497-503.
27. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Influence of the sickness benefit reform on sickness absence. Health Policy. 2016;120(9):1070-1078.
28. De Paola M, Scoppa V, Pupo V. Absenteeism in the Italian public sector: the effects of changes in sick leave policy. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):337-360.
29. Kausto J, Viikari-Juntura E, Virta LJ, Gould R, Koskinen A, Solovieva S. Effectiveness of new legislation on partial sickness benefit on work participation: a quasi-experiment in Finland. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e006685.
30. Kausto J, Miranda H, Martimo KP, Viikari-Juntura E. Partial sick leave: review of its use, effects and feasibility in the Nordic countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34(4):239249.
31. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. The effects of expanding the generosity of the statutory sickness insurance system. J Appl Econ. 2014;29(2):208-230.
32. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. A natural experiment on sick pay cuts, sickness absence, and labor costs. J Public Econ. 2010;94(11):1108-1122.
33. Fevang E, Markussen S, Røed K. The sick pay trap. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):305-336.
34. Schuster MA, Chung PJ, Elliott MN, Garfield CF, Vestal KD, Klein DJ. Awareness and use of California’s Paid Family Leave Insurance among parents of chronically ill children. JAMA. 2008;300(9):1047-1055.
35. Baum CL. The effect of state maternity leave legislation and the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act on employment and wages. Labour Econ. 2003;10(5):573-596.
36. Goodpaster NK. Leaves and leaving: the Family and Medical Leave Act and the decline in maternal labor force participation. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1).
37. Han WJ, Waldfogel J. Parental leave: the impact of recent legislation on parents’ leave taking. Demography. 2003;40(1):191-200.
38. Rossin M. The effects of maternity leave on children’s birth and infant health outcomes in the United States. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):221-239.
39. Schott W. Going back part-time: family leave legislation and women’s return to work. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2012;31(1):1-30.
40. Hofferth SL, Curtin SC. Parental leave statutes and maternal return to work after childbirth in the United States. Work Occup. 2006;33(1):73-105.
41. Waldfogel J. The impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act. J Policy Anal Manage. 1999;18(2):281-302.
42. Baum CL. The effects of maternity leave legislation on mothers’ labor supply after childbirth. South Econ J. 2003;69(4):772-799.
43. Waldfogel J. Family leave coverage in the 1990s. Mon Labor Rev. 1999;122(10):13-21.
44. Washbrook E, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J, Han W-J. Public policies, women’s employment after childbearing, and child well-being. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2011;11(1).
45. Stoddard C, Stock WA, Hogenson E. The impact of maternity leave laws on cesarean delivery. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2016;16(1).
46. Shim J. Family leave policy and child mortality: evidence from 19 OECD countries from 1969 to 2010. Int J Soc Welf. 2016;25(3):215-221.
47. Tanaka S. Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F7-F28.
48. Ruhm CJ. Parental leave and child health. J Health Econ. 2000;19(6):931-960.
49. Schober PS. Parental leave and domestic work of mothers and fathers: a longitudinal study of two reforms in West Germany. J Soc Policy. 2014;43(2):351-372.
50. Lapuerta I, Baizán P, González MJ. Individual and institutional constraints: an analysis of parental leave use and duration in Spain. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2011;30(2):185-210.
51. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
52. Dustmann C, Schonberg U. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and children’s long-term outcomes. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012;4(3):190-224.
53. Rege M, Solli IF. The impact of paternity leave on fathers’ future earnings. Demography. 2013;50(6):2255-2277.
54. Han WJ, Ruhm C, Waldfogel J. Parental leave policies and parents’ employment and leave-taking. J Policy Anal Manage. 2009;28(1):29-54.
55. Pronzato CD. Return to work after childbirth: does parental leave matter in Europe? Rev Econ Househ. 2009;7(4):341-360.
56. Schonberg U, Ludsteck J. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers’ labor market outcomes after childbirth. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(3):469-505.
57. Hanel B. The impact of paid maternity leave rights on labour market outcomes. Econ Rec. 2013;89(286):339-366.
58. Geyer J, Haan P, Wrohlich K. The effects of family policy on maternal labor supply: combining evidence from a structural model and a quasi-experimental approach. Labour Econ. 2015;36: 84-98.
59. Ziefle A, Gangl M. Do women respond to changes in family policy? A quasi-experimental study of the duration of mothers’ employment interruptions in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2014;30(5):562-581.
60. Ronsen M, Sundstrom M. Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers: a comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. Eur J Popul. 2002;18(2):121-152.
61. Hanratty M, Trzcinski E. Who benefits from paid family leave? Impact of expansions in Canadian paid family leave on maternal employment and transfer income. J Popul Econ. 2009;22(3):693711.
62. Matysiak A, Szalma I. Effects of parental leave policies on second birth risks and women’s employment entry. Population. 2014;69(4):599-636.
63. Bergemann A, Riphahn RT. Female labour supply and parental leave benefits—the causal effect of paying higher transfers for a shorter period of time. Appl Econ Lett. 2010;18(1):17-20.
64. Geyer J, Haan P, Spieß CK, Wrohlich K. Das Elterngeld und seine Wirkungen auf das Haushaltseinkommen junger Familien und die Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern [The new German parental leave benefit scheme and its effects on young families’ household income and on mothers’ paid employment]. ZfF–Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2): 193-211.
65. Bujard M, Passet J. Wirkungen des Elterngelds auf Einkommen und Fertilität [Effects of the new German parental leave benefit on income and fertility]. ZfF–Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2):212-237.
66. Winegarden CR, Bracy PM. Demographic consequences of maternal-leave programs in industrial countries: evidence from fixed-effects models. South Econ J. 1995;61(4):1020-1035.
67. Brugiavini A, Pasini G, Trevisan E. The direct impact of maternity benefits on leave taking: evidence from complete fertility histories. Adv Life Course Res. 2013;18(1):46-67.
68. Akgunduz YE, Plantenga J. Labour market effects of parental leave in Europe. Cambridge J Econ. 2013;37(4):845-862.
69. Ruhm CJ. The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: lessons from Europe. Q J Econ. 1998;113(1):285-317.
70. Lalive R, Schlosser A, Steinhauer A, Zweimüller J. Parental leave and mothers’ careers: the relative importance of job protection and cash benefits. Rev Econ Stud. 2014;81(1):219-265.
71. Asai Y. Parental leave reforms and the employment of new mothers: quasi-experimental evidence from Japan. Labour Econ. 2015;36:72-83.
72. Waldfogel J. The family gap for young women in the United States and Britain: can maternity leave make a difference? J Labor Econ. 1998;16(3):505-545.
73. Waldfogel J, Higuchi Y, Abe M. Family leave policies and women’s retention after childbirth: evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. J Popul Econ. 1999;12(4):523-545.
74. Kluve J, Tamm M. Parental leave regulations, mothers’ labor force attachment and fathers’ childcare involvement: evidence from a natural experiment. J Popul Econ. 2013;26(3):9831005.
75. Del Boca D, Pasqua S, Pronzato C. Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective. Oxf Econ Pap. 2009;61(Suppl. 1):i147-i171.
76. Mukhopadhyay S. The effects of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act on female labor supply. Int Econ Rev. 2012;53(4):11331153.
77. Das T, Polachek SW. Unanticipated effects of California’s paid family leave program. Contemp Econ Policy. 2015;33(4):619-635.
78. Lalive R, Zweimuller J. How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. Q J Econ. 2009;124(3):1363-1402.
79. Joseph O, Pailhe A, Recotillet I, Solaz A. The economic impact of taking short parental leave: evaluation of a French reform. Labour Econ. 2013;25:63-75.
80. Rasmussen AW. Increasing the length of parents’ birth-related leave: the effect on children’s long-term educational outcomes. Labour Econ. 2010;17(1):91-100.
81. Maldonado LC, Nieuwenhuis R. Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978–2008. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(4):395-415.
82. Misra J, Moller S, Strader E, Wemlinger E. Family policies, employment and poverty among partnered and single mothers. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2012;30(1):113-128.
83. Stier H, Mandel H. Inequality in the family: the institutional aspects of women’s earning contribution. Soc Sci Res. 2009;38(3):594-608.
84. Budig MJ, Misra J, Boeckmann I. Work-family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work Occup. 2016;43(2):119-177.
85. Erhel C, Guergoat-Larivière M. Labor market regimes, family policies, and women’s behavior in the EU. Fem Econ. 2013;19(4):76-109.
86. De Henau J, Meulders D, O’Dorchai S. Maybe baby: comparing partnered women’s employment and child policies in the EU-15. Fem Econ. 2010;16(1):43-77.
87. Pettit B, Hook JL. The structure of women’s employment in comparative perspective. Social Forces. 2005;84(2):779-801.
88. Fuwa M, Cohen PN. Housework and social policy. Soc Sci Res. 2007;36(2):512-530.
89. Hook JL. Gender inequality in the welfare state: sex segregation in housework, 1965–2003. AJS. 2010;115(5):1480-1523.
90. Hook JL. Care in context: men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. Am Soc Rev. 2006;71(4):639-660.
91. Boll C, Leppin J, Reich N. Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: evidence from industrialized countries. Rev Econ Househ. 2014;12(1):129-158.
92. Stearns J. The effects of paid maternity leave: evidence from Temporary Disability Insurance. J Health Econ. 2015;43:85-102.
93. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
94. Kottwitz A, Oppermann A, Spiess CK. Parental leave benefits and breastfeeding in Germany: effects of the 2007 reform. Rev Econ Househ. 2016;14(4):859-890.
95. Klevens J, Luo F, Xu L, Peterson C, Latzman NE. Paid family leave’s effect on hospital admissions for pediatric abusive head trauma. Inj Prev. 2016;11:11.
96. Daku M, Raub A, Heymann J. Maternal leave policies and vaccination coverage: a global analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(2):120124.
97. Liu Q, Skans ON. The duration of paid parental leave and children’s scholastic performance. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1):1-35.
98. Baker M, Milligan K. Evidence from maternity leave expansions of the impact of maternal care on early child development. J Hum Resour. 2010;45(1):1-32.
99. Carneiro P, Løken KV, Salvanes KG. A flying start? Maternity leave benefits and long-run outcomes of children. J Polit Econ. 2015;123(2):365-412.
100. Engster D, Stensöta HO. Do family policy regimes matter for children’s well-being? Soc Polit. 2011;18(1):82-124.
101. Avendano M, Berkman LF, Brugiavini A, Pasini G. The long-run effect of maternity leave benefits on mental health: evidence from European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:45-53.
102. Duvander A-Z, Johansson M. What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use? J Eur Soc Policy. 2012;22(3):319-330.
103. Bünning M, Pollmann-Schult M. Family policies and fathers’ working hours: cross-national differences in the paternal labour supply. Work Employ Soc. 2016;30(2):256-274.
104. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: causal effects of paternity leave. Soc Sci Res. 2011;40(6):1611-1622.
105. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. Causal effects of parental leave on adolescents’ household work. Social Forces. 2013;92(1):329-351.
106. Rønsen M, Kitterød RH. Gender-equalizing family policies and mothers’ entry into paid work: recent evidence from Norway. Fem Econ. 2015;21(1):59-89.
107. Dale-Olsen H. Sickness absence, sick leave pay, and pay schemes. Labour. 2014;28(1):40-63.
108. Hall C, Hartman L. Moral hazard among the sick and unemployed: evidence from a Swedish social insurance reform. Empir Econ. 2010;39(1):27-50.
109. Henrekson M, Persson M. The effects on sick leave of changes in the sickness insurance system. J Labor Econ. 2004;22(1):87-113.
110. Johansson P, Palme M. Assessing the effect of public policy on worker absenteeism. J Hum Resour. 2002;37(2):381-409.
111. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of a sick pay reform on absence and on health-related outcomes. J Health Econ. 2010;29(2):285-302.
112. Olsson M, Thoursie PS. Sickness insurance and spousal labour supply. Labour Econ. 2015;33:41-54.
113. Ziebarth NR. Long-term absenteeism and moral hazard: evidence from a natural experiment. Labour Econ. 2013;24:277-292.
114. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
115. Thyrian JR, Fendrich K, Lange A, Haas JP, Zygmunt M, Hoffmann W. Changing maternity leave policy: short-term effects on fertility rates and demographic variables in Germany. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(4):672-676.
116. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of parental leave extension on training for young women. J Popul Econ. 2011;24(2):731-760.
117. Escobedo A, Wall K. Leave policies in Southern Europe: continuities and changes. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(2):218235.
118. Milkman R, Appelbaum E. Unfinished Business: Paid Family Leave in California and the Future of US Work-Family Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2013.