feat(notes): Add meeting notes December

This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2023-12-12 20:12:20 +01:00
parent 7db335a479
commit d8a018b7b0
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
2 changed files with 67 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Meeting Miguel
- Sync to Dropbox new versions
- Fix automatic synchronization
- Restructure synthesis from inequ -> intervention to intervention -> inequ
- Structure synthesis overall to adhere to ILO thematic areas

View file

@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# Meeting ILO
## Progress
- search protocol and methodology has been finished first
- the identification process was finished middle of November
- the raw study pool from querying was created and all potential studies identified
- screening was finished 2 weeks ago
- now I'm extracting, we are at roughly
- 30 relevant studies done and by current estimates ~> 60 relevant ones are in the pool
- so that is what could be done end of the year, with findings extracted
- but this is missing the second snowballing pass, getting relevant sources from
- to get links of different areas
## Deadlines
- december will be doable for a structural outline and preliminary findings
- the complete pass will
## Outline feedback
- a lot of feedback on the outline
- issues with
- technical/theoretical/operational work
- but also highly political
- we need to respect the political process
-
- workers and employers side will be the
- final output will be pre-approved
- send **individual output** eoy
- it need to be a 'visibly' final output
- it does not need to be final but *complete*
- we will **send invoices** for our work beginning of year
- we will still be paid with 2023 funds
- work will **continue afterwards**
- plan
- sending revised outline
- getting feedback
- have presentation
- sending final collated/collected output
- this is planned as a 'phase1' project
- we are laying foundations for additional statistical work used by ILO
- we can bring our own own ideas
- new outline
- presentation of work
- informal workplan
- plans for phase2
- from my side to at least minimize the issue of 'getting lost in translation' for findings or approaches
- I made sure to work out the rigorous / academic methodology of the review process
- the important/priority part now is to translate that into the findings
---
- "human driven exercises so there is always the possibility for errors"
- rosalia and colleagues the reach colleagues?