chore(repo): Move extracted yml data to processed dir
Since it has been processed it should reside in the processed dir
This commit is contained in:
parent
4cc1fb8b34
commit
d3a6b1296b
11 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
40
02-data/processed/irrelevant/Saleh2018.yml
Normal file
40
02-data/processed/irrelevant/Saleh2018.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
|||
author: Saleh, M. C., & Bruyere, S. M.
|
||||
year: 2018
|
||||
title: Leveraging employer practices in global regulatory frameworks to improve employment outcomes for people with disabilities
|
||||
publisher: Social Inclusion
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v6i1.1201
|
||||
discipline: sociology
|
||||
|
||||
country:
|
||||
period:
|
||||
maxlength:
|
||||
targeting:
|
||||
group:
|
||||
data:
|
||||
|
||||
design:
|
||||
method:
|
||||
sample:
|
||||
unit:
|
||||
representativeness:
|
||||
causal: # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations:
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention:
|
||||
institutional:
|
||||
structural:
|
||||
agency:
|
||||
inequality:
|
||||
type: # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures:
|
||||
findings:
|
||||
channels:
|
||||
direction: # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A global regulatory overview of main barriers and facilitators for a) increasing employment equality for disabled people and b) increasing workplace equality for disabled people.
|
||||
39
02-data/processed/irrelevant/deGeus2022.yml
Normal file
39
02-data/processed/irrelevant/deGeus2022.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||
author: de Geus, C. J. C., Huysmans, M. A., van Rijssen, H. J., & Anema, J. R.
|
||||
year: 2022
|
||||
title: "Return to work factors and vocational rehabilitation interventions for long-term, partially disabled workers: A modified Delphi study among vocational rehabilitation professionals"
|
||||
publisher: Bmc Public Health
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13295-6
|
||||
discipline: health policy
|
||||
|
||||
country:
|
||||
period:
|
||||
maxlength:
|
||||
targeting: explicit
|
||||
group: long-term disabled workers
|
||||
data:
|
||||
|
||||
design:
|
||||
method: Delphi-study
|
||||
sample:
|
||||
unit:
|
||||
representativeness:
|
||||
causal: # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations:
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention:
|
||||
institutional:
|
||||
structural:
|
||||
agency:
|
||||
inequality:
|
||||
type: # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: rtw
|
||||
findings:
|
||||
channels:
|
||||
direction:
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation:
|
||||
46
02-data/processed/relevant/Broadway2020.yml
Normal file
46
02-data/processed/relevant/Broadway2020.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|||
author: Broadway, B., Kalb, G., McVicar, D., & Martin, B.
|
||||
year: 2020
|
||||
title: The Impact of Paid Parental Leave on Labor Supply and Employment Outcomes in Australia
|
||||
publisher: Feminist Economics
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2020.1718175
|
||||
discipline: economics
|
||||
|
||||
country: Australia
|
||||
period: 2009-2012
|
||||
maxlength: 14
|
||||
targeting: explicit
|
||||
group: working mothers
|
||||
data: national administrative surveys Baseline Mothers Survey (BaMS), Family and Work Cohort Study (FaWCS)
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: propensity score matching
|
||||
sample: 5000
|
||||
unit: individuals
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: can not account for child-care costs; can not fully exclude selection bias into motherhood; potential (down-ward) bias through pre-birth labor supply effects/financial crisis
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: paid leave
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: gender; income
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: rtw
|
||||
findings: short-term (<6months) decrease of rtw; long-term (>6-9months) significant positive impact on returning to work in same job under same conditions; greatest response from disadvantaged mothers
|
||||
channels: supplants previous employer-funded leave which often did not exist for disadvantaged mothers; reduction in opportunity cost of delaying rtw
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes: child-care costs may have additional dampening effect on rtw
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study on the introduction of univeral paid maternal leave in Australia, looking at its impacts on mothers returning to work and the conditions they return under.
|
||||
It finds that, while there is a short-term decrease of mothers returning to work since they make use of the introduced leave period, over the long-term (after six to nine months) there is a significant positive impact on return-to-work.
|
||||
Furthermore, there is a positive impact on returning to work in the same job and under the same conditions,
|
||||
the effects of which are stronger for more disadvantaged mothers (measured through income, education and access to employer-funded leave).
|
||||
This suggests that the intervention reduced the opportunity costs for delaying the return to work, and especially for those women that did not have employer-funded leave options, directly benefiting more disadvantaged mothers.
|
||||
Some potential biases of the study are its inability to account for child-care costs, as well as not being able to fully exclude selection bias into motherhood.
|
||||
There also remains the potential of results being biased through pre-birth labor supply effects or the results of the financial crisis, which may create a down-ward bias for either the short- or long-term effects.
|
||||
46
02-data/processed/relevant/Chao2022.yml
Normal file
46
02-data/processed/relevant/Chao2022.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|||
author: Chao, C.-C., Ee, M. S., Nguyen, X., & Yu, E. S. H.
|
||||
year: 2022
|
||||
title: "Minimum wage, firm dynamics, and wage inequality: Theory and evidence"
|
||||
publisher: International Journal Of Economic Theory
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12307
|
||||
discipline: economics
|
||||
|
||||
country: global
|
||||
period: 2005-2015
|
||||
maxlength:
|
||||
targeting:
|
||||
group: formal workers
|
||||
data: WB Doing Business Survey, WDI, ILOSTAT
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: dual economy general-equilibrium model; Gini coefficient
|
||||
sample: 43
|
||||
unit: country
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory: Harris & Todaro rural-urban migration model
|
||||
limitations: decreasing inequality through increased rural agricultural capital, while reasonable, has to be a prior assumption; short-term firm exit has to be omitted
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: minimum wage
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
findings: short-term reduction of skilled-unskilled wage gap but increased unemployment, decreased welfare; long-term increased wage equality and improved social welfare
|
||||
channels: firm exit from urban manufacturing increases capital to rural agricultural sector
|
||||
direction: 1
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study looking at the effects of minimum wage increases on a country's income inequality, looking at the impacts in a sample of 43 countries, both LMIC and HIC.
|
||||
Using a general-equilibrium model, it finds that there are differences between the short-term and long-term effects of the increase:
|
||||
In the short term it leads to a reduction of the skilled-unskilled wage gap, however an increase in unemployment and welfare,
|
||||
while in the long term the results are an overall decrease in wage inequality as well as improved social welfare.
|
||||
It finds those results primarily stem from LMIC which experience significant effects driven by a long-term firm exit from the urban manufacturing sector thereby increasing available capital for the rural agricultural sector, while in HIC the results remain insignificant.
|
||||
The study uses the Gini coefficient for identifying a country's inequality.
|
||||
Some limitations of the study include the necessity to omit short-term urban firm exit for the impact to be significant, as well as requiring the, reasonable but necessary, prior assumption of decreased inequality through increased rural agricultural capital.
|
||||
57
02-data/processed/relevant/Clark2019.yml
Normal file
57
02-data/processed/relevant/Clark2019.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
|||
author: Clark, S., Kabiru, C. W., Laszlo, S., & Muthuri, S.
|
||||
year: 2019
|
||||
title: The Impact of Childcare on Poor Urban Women’s Economic Empowerment in Africa
|
||||
publisher: Demography
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-019-00793-3
|
||||
discipline: sociology
|
||||
|
||||
country: Kenya
|
||||
period: 2015-2016
|
||||
maxlength: 12
|
||||
targeting: explicit
|
||||
group: mothers
|
||||
data: national administrative survey Nairobi Urban Health and Demographic Surveillance System
|
||||
|
||||
design: experimental
|
||||
method: RCT
|
||||
sample: 738
|
||||
unit: individual
|
||||
representativeness: subnational, urban
|
||||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory: economic empowerment theory
|
||||
limitations: results restricted to 1 year; relatively high attrition rate
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: maternity benefits; childcare subsidy
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: poverty; gender
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment probability; hours worked
|
||||
findings: subsidy increased employment probability (8.5ppts) for poor married mothers
|
||||
channels: increased ability to work through lower childcare burden
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
- intervention: childcare subsidy
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: poverty; gender
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: hours worked
|
||||
findings: subsidy decreased hours worked without decreasing income for single mothers
|
||||
channels: allows shifting to jobs with more regular hours
|
||||
direction: 0 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
An experimental study on the impacts of providing childcare vouchers to poort women in urban Kenya, estimating the impacts on their economic empowerment.
|
||||
The empowerment is measured through disaggregated analyses of maternal income, employment probability and hours worked.
|
||||
It finds that, for married mothers there was a significantly positive effect on employment probability and hours worked, suggesting their increased ability to work through lower childcare costs increasing personal agency.
|
||||
For single mothers, it finds a negative effect on hours worked, though with a stable income.
|
||||
The authors suggest this is due to single Kenyan mothers already working increased hours compared to married mothers, though the effect shows the ability of single mothers to shift to jobs with more regular hours, even if they are not compatible with childcare.
|
||||
Minor limitations of the study are its restriction to effects within a period of 1 year, and a somewhat significant attrition rate to the endline survey.
|
||||
45
02-data/processed/relevant/Debowicz2014.yml
Normal file
45
02-data/processed/relevant/Debowicz2014.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
|||
author: Debowicz, D., & Golan, J
|
||||
year: 2014
|
||||
title: "The impact of Oportunidades on human capital and income distribution in Mexico: A top-down/bottom-up approach"
|
||||
publisher: Journal of Policy Modeling
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.014
|
||||
discipline: economics
|
||||
|
||||
country: Mexico
|
||||
period: 2008
|
||||
maxlength:
|
||||
targeting: explicit
|
||||
group: poor
|
||||
data: national administrative survey Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y Gastos de los Hogares (ENIGH) 2008
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: general equilibrium model, microeconometric simulation model; using Gini coefficient
|
||||
sample: 30000
|
||||
unit: household
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory: human capital theory
|
||||
limitations: analytical household-level limitations; no indirect cost-effects able to be accounted for; static model
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: cash transfer (conditional)
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income; generational
|
||||
type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: income
|
||||
findings: raises average income of poorest households by 23%
|
||||
channels: cash influx; positive wage effect benefitting those who keep their children at work; direct benefit for human capital increase (school attendance), indirect benefit for increased scarcity of unskilled labor
|
||||
direction: 1
|
||||
significance: 2
|
||||
|
||||
notes: study attempts to explictly account for spillover effects
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study looking at the impact of the cash transfer programme Oportunidades in Mexico, conditioned on a household's children school attendance, on income inequality among others.
|
||||
It finds that a combination of effects raises the average income of the poorest households by 23 percent.
|
||||
The authors argue in the short run this benefits households through the direct cash influx itself, as well as generating a positive wage effect benefitting those who keep their children at work.
|
||||
For the estimation of income inequality it uses the Gini coefficient.
|
||||
Additionally, over the long-term for the children in the model there is a direct benefit for those whose human capital is increased due to the programme, but also an indirect benefit for those who did not increase their human capital, because of the increased scarcity of unskilled labor as a secondary effect.
|
||||
Due to the relatively low cost of the programme if correctly targeted, it seems to have a significantly positive effect on the Mexican economy and its income equality.
|
||||
44
02-data/processed/relevant/Hojman2019.yml
Normal file
44
02-data/processed/relevant/Hojman2019.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
|||
author: Hojman, A., & López Bóo, F.
|
||||
year: 2019
|
||||
title: Cost-Effective Public Daycare in a Low-Income Economy Benefits Children and Mothers
|
||||
publisher: Inter-American Development Bank
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.18235/0001849
|
||||
discipline: development
|
||||
|
||||
country: Nicaragua
|
||||
period: 2013-2015
|
||||
maxlength: 24
|
||||
targeting: implicit
|
||||
group: poor mothers
|
||||
data: baseline survey and 12-month follow-up survey
|
||||
|
||||
design: experimental
|
||||
method: RCT; instrumental variable; marginal treatment effects
|
||||
sample: 1442
|
||||
unit: individual
|
||||
representativeness: subnational, urban
|
||||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: effect on employment is insignificant with IV on randomization alone; relatively small overall sample
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: maternity benefits; childcare subsidy
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 1
|
||||
inequality: gender; generational; income
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment; human capital
|
||||
findings: free childcare significantly increases work participation of mothers (14ppts); increases human capital of children
|
||||
channels: subsidy removes associated childcare costs (fewer childcare hours)
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 mfg / 2 cig
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
An experimental study looking at the effects of providing free childcare for poor urban mothers in Nicaragua under the 'Programo Urbano', looking at the effects on inequality for mothers and children.
|
||||
It finds that providing free childcare for young children of poor mothers significantly increases the employment probability of the mothers (14ppts) independently of the childcare quality.
|
||||
It also finds significantly positive impacts on the human capital of the children, though dependent on the quality of childcare facilities.
|
||||
This suggests childcare costs being removed through a quasi-subsidy reducing the required childcare time burden on mothers, increasing parental agency and employment choices.
|
||||
Some limitations to the study include a relatively small overall sample size, as well as employment effects becoming insignificant when the effect is measured on randomization alone (without an additional instrumental variable).
|
||||
47
02-data/processed/relevant/Sotomayor2021.yml
Normal file
47
02-data/processed/relevant/Sotomayor2021.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
|||
author: Sotomayor, Orlando J.
|
||||
year: 2020
|
||||
title: Can the minimum wage reduce poverty and inequality in the developing world? Evidence from Brazil
|
||||
publisher: World Development
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105182
|
||||
discipline: economics
|
||||
|
||||
country: Brazil
|
||||
period: 1995-2015
|
||||
maxlength: 12
|
||||
targeting: implicit
|
||||
group: workers
|
||||
data: national administrative surveys Monthly Employment survey (PME)
|
||||
|
||||
design: quasi-experimental
|
||||
method: difference-in-difference estimator
|
||||
sample: 40000
|
||||
unit: household
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
causal: 1
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: suvey data limited to per dwelling, can not account for inhabitants moving
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: minimum wage
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
structural: 0
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: income
|
||||
type: 0
|
||||
indicator: 1
|
||||
measures: poverty; income
|
||||
findings: within three months of minimum wage increases poverty declined by 2.8%, inequality declined by 2.4%; decreasing impact over time; diminishing returns when minimum is high relative to median earnings
|
||||
channels: unemployment costs (job losses) overwhelmed by benefits (higher wages); but inelastic relationship of increase and changes in poverty
|
||||
direction: 1
|
||||
significance: 2
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study on the impact of subsequent minimum wage floor introductions on poverty and income inequality in Brazil.
|
||||
It finds that in the short-term (3 months) wage floor increases reduced poverty by 2.8% and reduced income inequality by 2.4%.
|
||||
Over the longer-term these impacts decrease, and the minimum wage increases only show diminishing returns when the legal minimum is already high in relation to median earnings.
|
||||
It suggests that additional unemployment costs, created through new job losses through the introduction, are offset by the increased benefits --- the higher wages for workers.
|
||||
The authors also suggest an inelastic relationship between increases and poverty incidence.
|
||||
One limitation of the study is the limit of tracking individuals in the underlying data which can not account for people moving household to new locations.
|
||||
The data can only track individual dwellings --- instead of the households and inhabitants within --- and thus resembles repeated cross-sectional data more than actual panel data.
|
||||
|
||||
46
02-data/processed/relevant/Stock2021.yml
Normal file
46
02-data/processed/relevant/Stock2021.yml
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
|||
author: Stock, R. (2021).
|
||||
year: 2021
|
||||
title: "Bright as night: Illuminating the antinomies of `gender positive’ solar development"
|
||||
publisher: World Development
|
||||
uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105196
|
||||
discipline: development
|
||||
|
||||
country: India
|
||||
period: 2018
|
||||
maxlength: 1
|
||||
targeting: implicit
|
||||
group: women
|
||||
data: baseline survey, interviews
|
||||
|
||||
design: observational
|
||||
method: quantitative survey and in-depth interviews; discourse analysis
|
||||
sample: 200
|
||||
unit: household
|
||||
representativeness: subnational, rural
|
||||
causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory: authoritative knowledge power framework (Laclau&Mouffe)
|
||||
limitations: no causal research
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: infrastructure
|
||||
institutional: 0
|
||||
structural: 1
|
||||
agency: 0
|
||||
inequality: gender; class; spatial
|
||||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment; empowerment
|
||||
findings: insignificant increased employment probability; advantaged women predominantly belong to dominant castes
|
||||
channels: project capture by village female elites; women of disadvantaged castes further excluded from training and work opportunities
|
||||
direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 0 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
An observational study looking at the inclusionary or exclusionary effects of the infrastructure development of a solar park in India which specifically aims to work towards micro-scale equality through regional upliftment.
|
||||
The project included a training and temporary employment to local unskilled/semi-skilled labor.
|
||||
It finds that the development instead impacted equality negatively, creating socio-economic exclusion and disproportionately negatively affected women of lower castes.
|
||||
While acquiring basic additional skills, none of the women participating in training remained connected to the operators of the solar park and none were hired.
|
||||
An insignificant amount of women from local villages were working at the solar park, of which most belonged to the the dominant caste, and the redistributive potential was stymied through capture by village female elites.
|
||||
The author suggests this is an example of institutional design neglecting individual agency and structural power relations, especially intersectional inequalities between gender and caste.
|
||||
The study is limited in explanatory power through its observational design, not being able to make causal inferences.
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue