professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

fix: Add missing pdf file

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2023-10-05 18:39:40 +02:00
parent ff181d2737
commit b7185530db
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
03-supplementary_data/lib.bib
View file

@ -2393,7 +2393,7 @@
doi = {10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.012}, doi = {10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.012},
abstract = {This paper compiles a systematic review of research papers that identify the effect of international trade and trade liberalization policies on socio-economic targets linked to the sustainable development goals (SDGs). A comprehensive overview of the existing literature is provided, focusing on papers that identify causality and cov-ering topics that have not been systematically analyzed previously. While existing literature reviews have fo-cused on the effects of trade openness on economic growth, its consequences for other social-and sustainable -related goals have received much less attention. We restrict the review to social-and sustainability-related SDGs and classify the empirical findings in four categories. First, we analyze the extent to which trade affects pov-erty (SDGs-1, 2, 8). The findings indicate that trade increases average incomes in most cases and that trade re-forms that include the agricultural sector generally reduce poverty. Second, we examine labor market outcomes and analyze how international trade affects wages, unemployment, and informality (SDGs-1, 5, 8). We find that with more trade, employment and wages increase in the most dynamic sectors, but decrease in others with increases in informality in some developing countries. The third bloc documents papers that evaluate whether trade is good or bad for environmental quality, evaluating how trade reforms and increases in openness affect the environment at the macro and micro level (SDGs-3, 7, 11, 12, 15). The reviewed research indicates that the effects of trade on environmental quality are complex and depend on the sectors that liberalize and the ex-istence of environmental standards linked to trade agreements. The fourth category concerns the effect of trade flows on food security, hence questioning whether opening the economies could contribute to better per-formance in SDG-2 and SDG-9. In this area, the literature is still incipient and deals mainly with correlations. More research is needed to better define the concept of food security and related indicators and to collect better data. In summary, this systematic review should guide policymakers in developing countries in the decision-making pro-cess related to trade and industrial policies. The main recommendation is to consider the main findings when de-signing new trade policy strategies concerning both unilateral trade liberalization and free trade agreements negotiations.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}, abstract = {This paper compiles a systematic review of research papers that identify the effect of international trade and trade liberalization policies on socio-economic targets linked to the sustainable development goals (SDGs). A comprehensive overview of the existing literature is provided, focusing on papers that identify causality and cov-ering topics that have not been systematically analyzed previously. While existing literature reviews have fo-cused on the effects of trade openness on economic growth, its consequences for other social-and sustainable -related goals have received much less attention. We restrict the review to social-and sustainability-related SDGs and classify the empirical findings in four categories. First, we analyze the extent to which trade affects pov-erty (SDGs-1, 2, 8). The findings indicate that trade increases average incomes in most cases and that trade re-forms that include the agricultural sector generally reduce poverty. Second, we examine labor market outcomes and analyze how international trade affects wages, unemployment, and informality (SDGs-1, 5, 8). We find that with more trade, employment and wages increase in the most dynamic sectors, but decrease in others with increases in informality in some developing countries. The third bloc documents papers that evaluate whether trade is good or bad for environmental quality, evaluating how trade reforms and increases in openness affect the environment at the macro and micro level (SDGs-3, 7, 11, 12, 15). The reviewed research indicates that the effects of trade on environmental quality are complex and depend on the sectors that liberalize and the ex-istence of environmental standards linked to trade agreements. The fourth category concerns the effect of trade flows on food security, hence questioning whether opening the economies could contribute to better per-formance in SDG-2 and SDG-9. In this area, the literature is still incipient and deals mainly with correlations. More research is needed to better define the concept of food security and related indicators and to collect better data. In summary, this systematic review should guide policymakers in developing countries in the decision-making pro-cess related to trade and industrial policies. The main recommendation is to consider the main findings when de-signing new trade policy strategies concerning both unilateral trade liberalization and free trade agreements negotiations.(c) 2022 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
langid = {english}, langid = {english},
keywords = {review::systematic} keywords = {out::abstract,review::systematic}
} }
@article{Barsoum2019, @article{Barsoum2019,
@ -6975,7 +6975,8 @@
doi = {10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1391}, doi = {10.1176/appi.ps.57.10.1391},
abstract = {A major public policy problem is the extremely low labor force participation of people with severe mental illness coupled with their overrepresentation on the public disability rolls. This situation is especially troubling given the existence of evidence-based practices designed to return them to the labor force. This article reviews research from the fields of disability, economics, health care, and labor studies to describe the nature of barriers to paid work and economic security for people with disabling mental disorders. These barriers include low educational attainment, unfavorable labor market dynamics, low productivity, lack of appropriate vocational and clinical services, labor force discrimination, failure of protective legislation, work disincentives caused by state and federal policies, poverty-level income, linkage of health care access to disability beneficiary status, and ineffective work incentive programs. The article concludes with a discussion of current policy initiatives in health care, mental health, and disability. Recommendations for a comprehensive system of services and supports to address multiple barriers are presented. These include access to affordable health care, including mental health treatment and prescription drug coverage; integrated clinical and vocational services; safe and stable housing that is not threatened by changes in earned income; remedial and post-secondary education and vocational training; benefits counseling and financial literacy education; economic security through asset development; legal aid for dealing with employment discrimination; peer support and self-help to enhance vocational self-image and encourage labor force attachment; and active involvement of U.S. business and employer communities.}, abstract = {A major public policy problem is the extremely low labor force participation of people with severe mental illness coupled with their overrepresentation on the public disability rolls. This situation is especially troubling given the existence of evidence-based practices designed to return them to the labor force. This article reviews research from the fields of disability, economics, health care, and labor studies to describe the nature of barriers to paid work and economic security for people with disabling mental disorders. These barriers include low educational attainment, unfavorable labor market dynamics, low productivity, lack of appropriate vocational and clinical services, labor force discrimination, failure of protective legislation, work disincentives caused by state and federal policies, poverty-level income, linkage of health care access to disability beneficiary status, and ineffective work incentive programs. The article concludes with a discussion of current policy initiatives in health care, mental health, and disability. Recommendations for a comprehensive system of services and supports to address multiple barriers are presented. These include access to affordable health care, including mental health treatment and prescription drug coverage; integrated clinical and vocational services; safe and stable housing that is not threatened by changes in earned income; remedial and post-secondary education and vocational training; benefits counseling and financial literacy education; economic security through asset development; legal aid for dealing with employment discrimination; peer support and self-help to enhance vocational self-image and encourage labor force attachment; and active involvement of U.S. business and employer communities.},
langid = {english}, langid = {english},
keywords = {review} keywords = {review},
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/ESPFHGCM/Cook_2006_Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities.pdf}
} }
@article{Cook2011, @article{Cook2011,