feat(notes): Update inclusion criteria and query

notes.md

@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ Policy *areas*, identified by @ILO2022b:
 | Time frame  | study published in or after 2000                                                             | study published before 2000                                               |
 | Study type  | primary research                                                                             | opinion piece, editorial, commentary, news article, literature review     |
 |             | most recent publication of study                                                             | gray literature superseded by white literature publication                |
-| Study focus | inequality or labour market outcomes as primary outcome (dependent variable) | neither inequality nor labour market outcomes as dependent variable       |
+| Study focus | inequalities/ inequalities in labour market outcomes as primary outcome (dependent variable) | neither inequality nor labour market outcomes as dependent variable       |
 |             | policy measure or strategy as primary intervention (independent variable)                    | no policy measure/strategy as intervention or relationship unclear        |
 |             | specifically relates to some dimension of world of work                                      | exists outside world of work for both independent and dependent variables |
 |             | focus on dimension of inequality in analysis                                                 | no focus on mention of inequality in analysis                             |
@@ -948,16 +948,16 @@ TS=
         disparity OR
         disparities
     )
-    AND
+    NEAR/5
     (
         (
             income OR
-            Palma ratio OR
-            Gini coefficient OR
+            "Palma ratio" OR
+            "Gini coefficient" OR
             class OR
             fertility OR
-            bottom percentile OR
-            top percentile
+            "bottom percentile" OR
+            "top percentile"
         )
         OR
         (
@@ -973,12 +973,12 @@ TS=
             rural OR
             urban OR
             mega-cities OR
-            small cities OR
-            peripheral cities OR
+            "small cities" OR
+            "peripheral cities" OR
             age OR
             nationality OR
             ethnicity OR
-            health status OR
+            "health status" OR
             disability OR
             characteristics
         )
@@ -986,6 +986,45 @@ TS=
 )
 ```
 
+# Findings and Updates from query
+
+## Preliminary source pool
+
+- initial query pool (no deduplication): 1643
+- snowballing pool (from 29 reviews): 530
+
+## Additional concept research
+
+- utilizing Joanna Briggs Institute JBI Scoping Review methodology
+
+## Preliminary findings income
+
+- potential drivers: (Zhuan2023)
+    - inverted-U hypothesis (Kuznets, 1955)/ dual economy model (Lewis, 1954)
+    - technological progress
+    - globalization
+    - deregulation/market-oriented reform
+    - financialization
+    - population aging
+    - widening spatial inequality between subsistence/growth economy (i.e. dual economy)
+    - growing gap to super-rich (top 1 percentile)
+- potential channels:
+    - declining labor income share/ growing capital income share
+    - widening skilled/non-skilled wage differentials
+    - growing spatial inequality
+    - limited taxation/transfer income redistribution
+
+## Potential additional search terms
+
+- Matthew effect (lower socio-economic position households send fewer children to formal childcare in HIC)
+- issue: currently in many cases looking at *health* and *health inequality* outcomes
+
+## Issues raised by ILO
+
+- only english: Query itself is English only. If Spanish/French fall into grid, may include
+- no purely qualitative: might prove too much; how to ensure rigour?
+- no pre-2000: Can include?
+
 \pagebreak
 
 # Relevant references