chore(data): Merge zotero library exports
To not double-commit every library change, we simply export ALL of the zotero library into a single file in the 'intermediate' data directory. Technically this still works just as well since it still reflects our 'intermediate' stage of tagging, screening, keywording the library contents. It just contains the non-sampled contents as well now.
This commit is contained in:
parent
245b44885c
commit
95ad5ed641
GPG key ID:
EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
8 changed files with 6 additions and 52468 deletions
|
|
@ -1107,6 +1107,24 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency in outcomes (no WoW)},
|
|||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/T36QI5AZ/Arias et al_2004_Education, family background and racial earnings inequality ill Brazil.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Arksey2005,
|
||||
title = {Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Scoping Studies},
|
||||
author = {Arksey, Hilary and O'Malley, Lisa},
|
||||
year = {2005},
|
||||
month = feb,
|
||||
journal = {International Journal of Social Research Methodology},
|
||||
volume = {8},
|
||||
number = {1},
|
||||
pages = {19--32},
|
||||
issn = {1364-5579, 1464-5300},
|
||||
doi = {10/bqnqnb},
|
||||
urldate = {2023-09-29},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {definition,review::scoping},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/RV4IJ7ZL/Arksey_O'Malley_2005_Scoping studies.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Armitage2020,
|
||||
title = {Considering Inequalities in the School Closure Response to {{COVID-19}}},
|
||||
author = {Armitage, Richard and Nellums, Laura B},
|
||||
|
|
@ -1697,6 +1715,22 @@ does NOT look at WoW}
|
|||
keywords = {out::title}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Ballet2020,
|
||||
title = {A Policy Framework for Social Sustainability: {{Social}} Cohesion, Equity and Safety},
|
||||
author = {Ballet, Jerome and Bazin, Damien and Mahieu, Fran{\c c}ois-Regis},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
month = sep,
|
||||
journal = {Sustainable Development},
|
||||
volume = {28},
|
||||
number = {5},
|
||||
pages = {1388--1394},
|
||||
publisher = {{John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd}},
|
||||
issn = {0968-0802},
|
||||
doi = {10.1002/sd.2092},
|
||||
urldate = {2023-10-15},
|
||||
abstract = {Abstract The purpose of our paper is to characterize the social pillar using the three criteria of social cohesion, equity and safety. Alongside this characterization we develop a policy framework to promote social sustainability, which has been the subject of much academic interest in recent years. In addition, we demonstrate that the social sustainability policies we advocate are capable of embracing environmental sustainability. Our work therefore provides a fresh perspective on sustainable development policies by emphasizing the importance of the social pillar to the policy making process.}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Balser2007,
|
||||
title = {Predictors of {{Workplace Accommodations}} for {{Employees With Mobility-Related Disabilities}}},
|
||||
author = {Balser, Deborah B.},
|
||||
|
|
@ -3054,6 +3088,21 @@ does NOT look at inequalities affected}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,inequality::education,inequality::gender,out::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Canelas2018,
|
||||
title = {Horizontal Inequality as an Outcome},
|
||||
author = {Canelas, Carla and Gisselquist, Rachel M.},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
month = jul,
|
||||
journal = {Oxford Development Studies},
|
||||
volume = {46},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
pages = {305--324},
|
||||
publisher = {{Informa UK Limited}},
|
||||
doi = {10.1080/13600818.2018.1508565},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/JEFWTZ7G/Canelas_Gisselquist_2018_Horizontal inequality as an outcome.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Capella2002,
|
||||
title = {Inequities in the {{VR System}}: {{Do They Still Exist}}?},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Inequities in the {{VR System}}},
|
||||
|
|
@ -3308,6 +3357,23 @@ does NOT look at inequalities affected}
|
|||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/HSIDD9AP/Chao et al_2022_Minimum wage, firm dynamics, and wage inequality.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Chaudhuri2021,
|
||||
title = {Coping {{Behaviours}} and the Concept of {{Time Poverty}}: A Review of Perceived Social and Health Outcomes of Food Insecurity on Women and Children},
|
||||
author = {Chaudhuri, Sriroop and Roy, Mimi and McDonald, Louis M. and Emendack, Yves},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
month = aug,
|
||||
journal = {Food Security},
|
||||
volume = {13},
|
||||
number = {4, SI},
|
||||
pages = {1049--1068},
|
||||
issn = {1876-4517},
|
||||
doi = {10.1007/s12571-021-01171-x},
|
||||
abstract = {Mounting concerns over food insecurity have emerged as a key agenda in many recent global development dialogues, on accounts of observed and expected health outcomes. The present study attempts a reflective summary around a yet little-explored aspect of food insecurity: health and social ramifications of coping behaviours (adaptive strategies to improve food availability, accessibility, utilisation, and stability), with specific emphasis on women and children. We conducted a systematic literature with different search engines and databases to identify a diversity of recent journal articles, reports, working papers, white papers, proceedings, dissertations, newspaper articles, book chapters, and grey literature, published in the post-2000s period. We thus identified two broad generic categories in the relevant global literature: coping behaviours that are (a) non-food (livelihood alterations) and (2) food-based. For women, the former includes outdoor employment, selling asset bases, borrowing food and/or money, and purchasing food on credit. Food-based coping strategies included reduced daily meal portion sizes and reducing the frequency of food uptake or skipping meals altogether (i.e., Food Rationing); nutritional switch (i.e., Food Stretching); and Food Sharing. Coping behaviours involving children primarily include dropping out of school, begging, stealing, and Food Seeking (i.e., eating outside home, with relatives or friends, or at charitable institutions). The likely health outcomes included stunting and wasting, disrupted socio-cognitive development among children. A subsidiary idea to conduct this study was to offer the concerned authorities an insight into the breadth of coping behaviours, so as to help them anticipate targeted and gender-responsive interventions on a priori basis. We offer a discourse on what we refer to as time poverty, especially for farm women, resulting from obligatory outdoor employment, mostly as farm labourers to highlight a social paradox: women provide massive contributions in the translation of high value goods and services of a vibrant global agricultural system, and yet are among the first victims of food insecurity themselves. This situation contradicts a number of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and aggravates gender disparity. In final section we appeal for more targeted, evidence-based research to establish direct causal linkages between food insecurity and coping behaviours, distinguishing them from life-as-usual scenarios. To that end, we present a brief critique on Coping Strategy Index (CSI) -a widely used tool to evaluate severity of coping behaviours.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::poverty,out::title,outcome::educational,outcome::job\_quality,review::systematic,snowball\_source},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/DA48J8QM/Chaudhuri et al_2021_Coping Behaviours and the concept of Time Poverty.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Chaudhuri2022,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {Anti-Immigration Policy in Developed Countries: {{Welfare}} and Distributional Implications for Developing Economies},
|
||||
|
|
@ -4532,6 +4598,21 @@ does not do impact analysis for single policy},
|
|||
langid = {english}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{dePaz-Banez2020,
|
||||
title = {Is {{There Empirical Evidence}} on {{How}} the {{Implementation}} of a {{Universal Basic Income}} ({{UBI}}) {{Affects Labour Supply}}? {{A Systematic Review}}},
|
||||
author = {{de Paz-Banez}, Manuela A. and {Asensio-Coto}, Maria Jose and {Sanchez-Lopez}, Celia and Aceytuno, Maria-Teresa},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
month = nov,
|
||||
journal = {Sustainability},
|
||||
volume = {12},
|
||||
number = {22},
|
||||
doi = {10.3390/su12229459},
|
||||
abstract = {The objective of this article is to determine, as conclusively as possible, if the implementation of a Universal Basic Income (UBI) would lead to a significant reduction in the working age population labour supply. If this were true, implementation of a UBI may not be sustainable. To do this, we will compile empirical evidence from studies over the last few decades on the effects of implementation of a UBI on employment. We apply the PRISMA methodology to better judge their validity, which ensures maximum reliability of the results by avoiding biases and making the work reproducible. Given that the methodologies used in these studies are diverse, they are reviewed to contextualize the results taking into account the possible limitations detected in these methodologies. While many authors have been writing about this issue citing experiences or experiments, the added value of this article is that it performs a systematic review following a widely tested scientific methodology. Over 1200 documents that discuss the UBI/employment relationship have been reviewed. We found a total of 50 empirical cases, of which 18 were selected, and 38 studies with contrasted empirical evidence on this relationship. The results speak for themselves: Despite a detailed search, we have not found any evidence of a significant reduction in labour supply. Instead, we found evidence that labour supply increases globally among adults, men and women, young and old, and the existence of some insignificant and functional reductions to the system such as a decrease in workers from the following categories: Children, the elderly, the sick, those with disabilities, women with young children to look after, or young people who continued studying. These reductions do not reduce the overall supply since it is largely offset by increased supply from other members of the community.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,intervention::basic\_income,out::title,outcome::labour\_supply,review::systematic},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/QSDCV6EM/de Paz-Banez et al_2020_Is There Empirical Evidence on How the Implementation of a Universal Basic.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@book{DePaz2020,
|
||||
title = {Gender {{Dimensions}} of the {{COVID-19 Pandemic}}},
|
||||
author = {De Paz, Carmen and Muller, Miriam and Munoz Boudet, Ana Maria and Gaddis, Isis},
|
||||
|
|
@ -4642,6 +4723,13 @@ does not do impact analysis for single policy},
|
|||
keywords = {out::title}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{DFI2023,
|
||||
title = {A Call to Action to Save {{SDG10}}},
|
||||
author = {{DFI}},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
institution = {{Development Finance International}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Dhatt2017,
|
||||
title = {The Role of Women's Leadership and Gender Equity in Leadership and Health System Strengthening},
|
||||
author = {Dhatt, R. and Theobald, S. and Buzuzi, S. and Ros, B. and Vong, S. and Muraya, K. and Molyneux, S. and Hawkins, K. and {Gonz{\'a}lez-Beiras}, C. and Ronsin, K. and Lichtenstein, D. and Wilkins, K. and Thompson, K. and Davis, K. and Jackson, C.},
|
||||
|
|
@ -5732,6 +5820,14 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency}
|
|||
langid = {english}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@book{EuropeanCommission.Directorate-GeneralforInternationalPartnerships2023a,
|
||||
title = {The {{European Commission Inequality Marker}}: {{Guidelines}} for the {{Application}} and {{Scoring}} of {{Interventions}}},
|
||||
author = {{European Commission. Directorate-General for International Partnerships}},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
publisher = {{Publications Office of the European Union}},
|
||||
isbn = {978-92-76-59307-2}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Evans2009,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {In a Different Place: {{Working-class}} Girls and Higher Education},
|
||||
|
|
@ -7852,6 +7948,30 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,inequality::gender,out::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Hastbacka2016,
|
||||
title = {Barriers and Facilitators to Societal Participation of People with Disabilities: {{A}} Scoping Review of Studies Concerning {{European}} Countries},
|
||||
author = {Hastbacka, Elisabeth and Nygard, Mikael and Nyqvist, Fredrica},
|
||||
year = {2016},
|
||||
month = sep,
|
||||
journal = {Alter-European Journal of Disability Research},
|
||||
volume = {10},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
pages = {201--220},
|
||||
issn = {1875-0672},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/j.alter.2016.02.002},
|
||||
abstract = {The aim of this scoping review is to explore previous scientific studies relating to the scholarly understanding of societal participation of people with disabilities. Six relevant databases within social science were searched using societal participation of people with disabilities, or different combinations thereof, as search words. The criteria for inclusion were: working-age people with disabilities; societal participation; accounting for facilitators or/and barriers of participation; geographical focus on or link to Europe, peer-reviewed studies using quantitative or qualitative methods published in English between January 2012 and December 2013. Thirty-two studies met these inclusion criteria. Each study was analysed relating to four measures: identity of the participator group, type of participation; type of facilitators; type of barriers. The findings show that there is a dominating focus on labour market participation and that societal participation was studied mostly concerning disabled people in general instead of any specific group. The main barriers identified were related to financial factors, attitudes, health issues and unemployment. The most frequently identified facilitators were related to legislation and disability policies, as well as to support from people in close contact with disabled people, attitudes in society and employment opportunities for people with disabilities. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Association ALTER.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::disability,out::title,outcome::employment,outcome::social,outcome::wage,review::scoping,snowball\_source},
|
||||
note = {scoping review of linkages between societal participation and people with disabilities for identity of participant, type of participation, type of facilitators and barriers; focus on European countries (n=32, between 2012-2013)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings: strongest focus on labour market participation; social participation viewed through lens of disabled people as one group instead of intersectional
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main barriers: financial factors, attitudes, health issues, unemployment
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main facilitators: legislation and disability policies; support from people in close contact with disabled people, attitudes in society and employment opportunities for people with disabilities},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/4C8EVVV6/Hastbacka et al_2016_Barriers and facilitators to societal participation of people with disabilities.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Hay2019,
|
||||
title = {Disrupting Gender Norms in Health Systems: Making the Case for Change},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Disrupting Gender Norms in Health Systems},
|
||||
|
|
@ -8623,6 +8743,104 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,country::Turkey,inequality::gender,inequality::income,out::abstract,region::MENA}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2002,
|
||||
title = {Resolution on Decent Work and the Informal Economy},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2002},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2013,
|
||||
title = {Resolution Concerning Statistics of Work, Employment and Labour Underutilization},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2013},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2015,
|
||||
title = {Recommendation {{No}}. 204 Concerning the {{Transition}} from the {{Informal}} to the {{Formal Economy}}},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2015},
|
||||
address = {{International Labour Office, Geneva}},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2016,
|
||||
title = {Women at {{Work Trends}} 2016},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2016},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2019,
|
||||
title = {Working Conditions in a Global Perspective},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2019},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2021,
|
||||
title = {Resolution Concerning Inequalities and the World of Work},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2021a,
|
||||
title = {Inequalities and the World of Work},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2022,
|
||||
title = {Country Grouping},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2022}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2022a,
|
||||
title = {World {{Employment}} and {{Social Outlook}}: {{Trends}} 2022},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2022},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2022b,
|
||||
title = {Follow-up to the Resolution Concerning Inequalities and the World of Work: {{Comprehensive}} and Integrated {{ILO}} Strategy to Reduce and Prevent Inequalities in the World of Work},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2022},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2023,
|
||||
title = {World {{Employment}} and {{Social Outlook}}: {{Trends}} 2023},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2023a,
|
||||
title = {The Road to Decent Work for Domestic Workers},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2023b,
|
||||
title = {Guidelines Concerning a Statistical Definition of Informal Employment},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@techreport{ILO2023c,
|
||||
title = {Resolution Concerning Statistics on the Informal Economy},
|
||||
author = {{ILO}},
|
||||
year = {2023},
|
||||
institution = {{International Labour Organization}}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Ince2010,
|
||||
title = {How the Education Affects Female Labor Force? {{Empirical}} Evidence from {{Turkey}}},
|
||||
shorttitle = {How the Education Affects Female Labor Force?},
|
||||
|
|
@ -8872,6 +9090,21 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,inequality::gender,out::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Jenkins1988,
|
||||
title = {Empirical Measurement of Horizontal Inequity},
|
||||
author = {Jenkins, Stephen P.},
|
||||
year = {1988},
|
||||
month = dec,
|
||||
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
|
||||
volume = {37},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
pages = {305--329},
|
||||
publisher = {{Elsevier BV}},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/0047-2727(88)90044-8},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/NQUNDDHK/Jenkins_1988_Empirical measurement of horizontal inequity.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Jetelina2021,
|
||||
title = {Changes in Intimate Partner Violence during the Early Stages of the {{COVID-19}} Pandemic in the {{USA}}},
|
||||
author = {Jetelina, Katelyn K and Knell, Gregory and Molsberry, Rebecca J},
|
||||
|
|
@ -9059,6 +9292,20 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,country::Jordan,inequality::disability,inequality::education,inequality::gender,inequality::poverty,out::abstract,region::MENA}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Jorda2019,
|
||||
title = {Global Inequality: {{How}} Large Is the Effect of Top Incomes?},
|
||||
author = {Jord{\'a}, Vanesa and {Ni{\~n}o-Zaraz{\'u}a}, Miguel},
|
||||
year = {2019},
|
||||
month = nov,
|
||||
journal = {World Development},
|
||||
volume = {123},
|
||||
pages = {104593},
|
||||
publisher = {{Elsevier BV}},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.017},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/84NI6IJ9/Jordá_Niño-Zarazúa_2019_Global inequality.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Joshi2007,
|
||||
title = {Nonstandard {{Schedules}} and {{Young Children}}'s {{Behavioral Outcomes Among Working Low}}-{{Income Families}}},
|
||||
author = {Joshi, Pamela and Bogen, Karen},
|
||||
|
|
@ -9268,6 +9515,23 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency}
|
|||
keywords = {inequality::disability,inequality::generational,inequality::racial,TODO::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Kalasa2021,
|
||||
title = {Horizontal versus Vertical Inequalities: The Relative Significance of Geography versus Class in Mapping Subnational Fertility},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Horizontal versus Vertical Inequalities},
|
||||
author = {Kalasa, Benoit and {Eloundou-Enyegue}, Parfait and Giroux, Sarah C},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
month = jun,
|
||||
journal = {The Lancet Global Health},
|
||||
volume = {9},
|
||||
number = {6},
|
||||
pages = {e730-e731},
|
||||
issn = {2214109X},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00171-6},
|
||||
urldate = {2023-10-12},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/DFWWK3AV/Kalasa et al_2021_Horizontal versus vertical inequalities.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Kalbarczyk2022,
|
||||
title = {{{COVID-19}}, Nutrition, and Gender: {{An}} Evidence-Informed Approach to Gender-Responsive Policies and Programs},
|
||||
shorttitle = {{{COVID-19}}, Nutrition, and Gender},
|
||||
|
|
@ -9924,6 +10188,42 @@ does NOT look at LM adjacency}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,inequality::disability,out::title,review::meta,TODO::review}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Kirsh2016,
|
||||
title = {Client, {{Contextual}} and {{Program Elements Influencing Supported Employment}}: {{A Literature Review}}},
|
||||
author = {Kirsh, Bonnie},
|
||||
year = {2016},
|
||||
month = oct,
|
||||
journal = {Community Mental Health Journal},
|
||||
volume = {52},
|
||||
number = {7},
|
||||
pages = {809--820},
|
||||
issn = {0010-3853},
|
||||
doi = {10.1007/s10597-015-9936-7},
|
||||
abstract = {Supported employment is an evidence-based practice with a well-established research base. Most studies track such outcomes as employment rates, time to employment and wages earned. Few studies address client and contextual factors that impact outcomes or consider program elements beyond those that comprise the individual placement and support model. This paper reviews existing literature to shed light on the following questions: (1) What impact do labour market trends have on the effectiveness of SE? (2) How lasting are the effects of SE and what factors influence longevity of SE effects? (3) What levels and types of employment are targeted by SE? (4) What are the characteristics of people who benefit from SE? (5) What is the role of peer support in SE? and (6) What are the barriers to effective SE implementation? Research findings are synthesized and suggestions for service enhancements are offered so that the model can continue to evolve.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::age,inequality::disability,inequality::gender,intervention::employment\_support,out::title,outcome::employment,outcome::job\_quality,review::narrative,snowball\_source},
|
||||
note = {review of factors influencing LM outcomes of supported employment interventions for people with disabilities
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- most employment support literature only looks at overall efficacy of interventions, with little prudence for intersectional inequality variations
|
||||
\par
|
||||
inequalities:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- men more likely to be employed (argue possibly due to manual labour of many jobs)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- older people less likely to be employed (age+, change-)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- older women more likely to be employed than men
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- education very important in employment outcomes
|
||||
\par
|
||||
policy recc:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- vocational rehabilitation},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/6PID2PJX/Kirsh_2016_Client, Contextual and Program Elements Influencing Supported Employment.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Kithiia2020,
|
||||
title = {The Socio-Economic Impacts of {{Covid-19}} Restrictions: {{Data}} from the Coastal City of {{Mombasa}}, {{Kenya}}},
|
||||
shorttitle = {The Socio-Economic Impacts of {{Covid-19}} Restrictions},
|
||||
|
|
@ -10382,6 +10682,39 @@ however data will be very useful to explore channels of health ineq -{$>$} incom
|
|||
keywords = {out::title}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Lettieri2017,
|
||||
title = {A {{Systematization}} of the {{International Evidence Related}} to {{Labor Inclusion Barriers}} and {{Facilitators}} for {{People}} with {{Mental Illness A Review}} of {{Reviews}}},
|
||||
author = {Lettieri, Andrea and Diez Villoria, Emiliano},
|
||||
year = {2017},
|
||||
journal = {Sociologica-Italian Journal of Sociology on Line},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
issn = {1971-8853},
|
||||
doi = {10.2383/89515},
|
||||
abstract = {Bringing people with mental illness into employment is a phenomenon that has been extensively researched in recent years. A review to identify and synthesize available evidence on bringing this group into employment and the potential fields of interest related to barriers and facilitators has been carried out. The electronic search was done using 17 databases. In total 24 publications of systematic reviews, meta-analysis and meta-ethnographies aimed at individuating and systematizing barriers to work inclusion were included. The different process phases and the variety of circumstances that can slow down or push towards a certain condition of job seeker or employee, together with the rest of the results presented in this work, demonstrate the need to re-direct or extend the research focus related to this issue.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::disability,intervention::employment\_support,intervention::therapy,intervention::training,out::title,outcome::employment,outcome::job\_quality,review::meta,snowball\_source},
|
||||
note = {meta-review of barriers (and drivers) of inclusion into the labour market for people with disabilities (mental illness)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings: employment outcomes seem increased for individuals able to hide their mental illness, practice of concealment of identity
|
||||
\par
|
||||
channels:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- prejudices: of missing skills, danger, unpredictability; of hiring as act of charity due to being unproductive; of work stress as contradicting requirements of mental health
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- discriminatory hiring practices
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- generally low-skilled individuals due to discrimination/cultural/social barriers for training and work inclusion
|
||||
\par
|
||||
policy recc:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- supported employment (environmental)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- cognitive behavioural/computer-assisted therapies (cognitive)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- vocational rehabilitation programs (human capital)},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/HLXMGS6S/Lettieri_Diez Villoria_2017_A Systematization of the International Evidence Related to Labor Inclusion.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Levine1994,
|
||||
title = {An {{Analysis}} by {{Gender}} of {{Long-Term Postschool Outcomes}} for {{Youth}} with and without {{Disabilities}}},
|
||||
author = {Levine, Phyllis and Edgar, Eugene},
|
||||
|
|
@ -12893,6 +13226,22 @@ barrier/facilitators: self-advocacy, support of employer and community, amount o
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,inequality::health,inequality::income,out::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Nino-Zarazua2017,
|
||||
title = {Global {{Inequality}}: {{Relatively Lower}}, {{Absolutely Higher}}},
|
||||
author = {{Ni{\~n}o-Zaraz{\'u}a}, Miguel and Roope, Laurence and Tarp, Finn},
|
||||
year = {2017},
|
||||
month = dec,
|
||||
journal = {Review of Income and Wealth},
|
||||
volume = {63},
|
||||
number = {4},
|
||||
pages = {661--684},
|
||||
publisher = {{Wiley}},
|
||||
doi = {10.1111/roiw.12240},
|
||||
abstract = {{$<$}jats:title{$>$}Abstract{$<$}/jats:title{$><$}jats:p{$>$}This paper measures trends in global interpersonal inequality during 1975{\textendash}2010 using data from the most recent version of the World Income Inequality Database (WIID). The picture that emerges using `absolute,' and even `centrist' measures of inequality, is very different from the results obtained using standard `relative' inequality measures such as the Gini coefficient or Coefficient of Variation. Relative global inequality has declined substantially over the decades. In contrast, `absolute' inequality, as captured by the Standard Deviation and Absolute Gini, has increased considerably and unabated. Like these `absolute' measures, our `centrist' inequality indicators, the Krtscha measure and an intermediate Gini, also register a pronounced increase in global inequality, albeit, in the case of the latter, with a decline during 2005 to 2010. A critical question posed by our findings is whether increased levels of inequality according to absolute and centrist measures are inevitable at today's per capita income levels. Our analysis suggests that it is not possible for absolute inequality to return to 1975 levels without further convergence in mean incomes among countries. Inequality, as captured by centrist measures such as the Krtscha, could return to 1975 levels, at today's domestic and global per capita income levels, but this would require quite dramatic structural reforms to reduce domestic inequality levels in most countries.{$<$}/jats:p{$>$}},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/CP9LILE2/Niño-Zarazúa et al_2017_Global Inequality.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Nooyens2005,
|
||||
title = {Effects of Retirement on Lifestyle in Relation to Changes in Weight and Waist Circumference in {{Dutch}} Men: A Prospective Study},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Effects of Retirement on Lifestyle in Relation to Changes in Weight and Waist Circumference in {{Dutch}} Men},
|
||||
|
|
@ -13730,6 +14079,62 @@ barrier/facilitators: self-advocacy, support of employer and community, amount o
|
|||
keywords = {out::title}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Perez2022,
|
||||
title = {The Changing Role of Employment and Alternative Income Sources among the Urban Poor: A Systematic Literature Review},
|
||||
author = {Perez, V and {Hernandez-Solano}, A. and Teruel, G. and Reyes, M.},
|
||||
year = {2022},
|
||||
month = dec,
|
||||
journal = {International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development},
|
||||
volume = {14},
|
||||
number = {1},
|
||||
pages = {124--143},
|
||||
issn = {1946-3138},
|
||||
doi = {10.1080/19463138.2022.2082444},
|
||||
abstract = {We perform a systematic review of the literature on the association between income, employment, and urban poverty from a multidisciplinary perspective. Our results, derived from the analysis of 243 articles, confirm the significant role of employment in the urban poor's lives, highlighting several factors that constrain their ability to improve their labour market outcomes: lack of access to public transport, geographical segregation, labour informality, among others. Furthermore, the paper finds different strategies used by the poor to promote their inclusion in their city's economy. We found a major bias towards research focused on advanced economies, stressing the need for development studies dealing with the specific challenges of developing economies.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,out::title,review::systematic,snowball\_source},
|
||||
note = {summary: multi-disciplinary systematic review of association between income, employment, urban poverty. n=243 articles, academic focus on advanced economies; finds significant role of employment in life of urban poor;
|
||||
\par
|
||||
findings: most relevant barriers for improving labour market outcomes: lack of access to public transport, geographical segregation, labour informality, inadequate human capital
|
||||
\par
|
||||
\# Inequality
|
||||
\par
|
||||
[@Perez2022] identify a multitude of factors which ultimately affect income, employment and urban poverty.
|
||||
\par
|
||||
Among them:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
gender inequality, through traditional gender roles and lack of empowerment, a lack of childcare, or inequal domestic work;
|
||||
\par
|
||||
low human capital, which can originate through pre-existing inequalities,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
spatial inequality, through lack of access to transportation, residential segregation or discrimination, limited access to work,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
the inter-generational persistence of poverty as well as the impacts of pre-existing inequalities such as lower human capital or larger household sizes;
|
||||
\par
|
||||
and external factors such as extreme weather events or inflation.
|
||||
\par
|
||||
Strategies to reduce poverty/unemployment are:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
participation in informal sectors or illegal activities,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
credit programs,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
consumption from informal food sources,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
family and institutional support for childcare,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
guaranteed minimum income or universal basic income and/or living wage,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
income diversification,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
commuting subsidies,
|
||||
\par
|
||||
housing mobility programs, and
|
||||
\par
|
||||
migration.},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/GN2BERMB/figure-factors-affecting-poverty.png;/home/marty/Zotero/storage/IR9S4BNR/Perez et al_2022_The changing role of employment and alternative income sources among the urban.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Perlman2006,
|
||||
title = {The {{Metamorphosis}} of {{Marginality}}: {{Four Generations}} in the {{Favelas}} of {{Rio}} de {{Janeiro}}},
|
||||
shorttitle = {The {{Metamorphosis}} of {{Marginality}}},
|
||||
|
|
@ -13747,6 +14152,24 @@ barrier/facilitators: self-advocacy, support of employer and community, amount o
|
|||
langid = {english}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Pham2014,
|
||||
title = {A Scoping Review of Scoping Reviews: Advancing the Approach and Enhancing the Consistency},
|
||||
shorttitle = {A Scoping Review of Scoping Reviews},
|
||||
author = {Pham, Mai T. and Raji{\'c}, Andrijana and Greig, Judy D. and Sargeant, Jan M. and Papadopoulos, Andrew and McEwen, Scott A.},
|
||||
year = {2014},
|
||||
month = dec,
|
||||
journal = {Research Synthesis Methods},
|
||||
volume = {5},
|
||||
number = {4},
|
||||
pages = {371--385},
|
||||
issn = {1759-2879, 1759-2887},
|
||||
doi = {10/gdkzzn},
|
||||
urldate = {2023-09-29},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {review::scoping},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/R9X393M3/Pham et al_2014_A scoping review of scoping reviews.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Pi2016,
|
||||
title = {Hukou System Reforms and Skilled-Unskilled Wage Inequality in {{China}}},
|
||||
author = {Pi, Jiancai and Zhang, Pengqing},
|
||||
|
|
@ -13956,6 +14379,21 @@ barrier/facilitators: self-advocacy, support of employer and community, amount o
|
|||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/TDDXH3U4/Plomien_2019_Gender inequality by design.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Plotnick1982,
|
||||
title = {The Concept and Measurement of Horizontal Inequity},
|
||||
author = {Plotnick, Robert},
|
||||
year = {1982},
|
||||
month = apr,
|
||||
journal = {Journal of Public Economics},
|
||||
volume = {17},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
pages = {373--391},
|
||||
publisher = {{Elsevier BV}},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/0047-2727(82)90071-8},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/MSECH9QC/Plotnick_1982_The concept and measurement of horizontal inequity.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Polgar1974,
|
||||
title = {The Effect of an Additional Birth on Low-Income Urban Families},
|
||||
author = {Polgar, Steven and Hiday, Virginia A.},
|
||||
|
|
@ -14382,6 +14820,22 @@ barrier/facilitators: self-advocacy, support of employer and community, amount o
|
|||
langid = {english}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Ravallion2018,
|
||||
title = {Inequality and {{Globalization}}: {{A Review Essay}}},
|
||||
author = {Ravallion, Martin},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
month = jun,
|
||||
journal = {Journal of Economic Literature},
|
||||
volume = {56},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {620--642},
|
||||
publisher = {{American Economic Association}},
|
||||
doi = {10.1257/jel.20171419},
|
||||
abstract = {{$<$}jats:p{$>$} As normally measured, ``global inequality'' is the relative inequality of incomes found among all people in the world no matter where they live. Francois Bourguignon and Branko Milanovic have written insightful and timely books on global inequality, emphasizing the role of globalization. The books are complementary: Milanovic provides an ambitious broad-brush picture, with some intriguing hypotheses on the processes at work; Bourguignon provides a deep and suitably qualified economic analysis. This paper questions the thesis of both books{\textemdash}that globalization has been a major driving force of inequality between or within countries. The paper also questions the robustness of the evidence for declining global inequality, and notes some conceptual limitations of standard measures in capturing the concerns of many observers in the ongoing debates about globalization and the policy responses. ( JEL D31, D63, E25, F61, F63) {$<$}/jats:p{$>$}},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/46HPABAW/Ravallion_2018_Inequality and Globalization.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Ray2017,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {Functioning and Disability in Recent Research from {{Cameroon}}: A Narrative Synthesis},
|
||||
|
|
@ -15828,6 +16282,29 @@ does NOT look at inequality outcomes}
|
|||
keywords = {out::title}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@book{Silber2012,
|
||||
title = {Handbook of {{Income Inequality Measurement}}},
|
||||
author = {Silber, Jacques},
|
||||
year = {2012},
|
||||
publisher = {{Springer London, Limited}},
|
||||
isbn = {978-94-011-4413-1}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Silvaggi2020,
|
||||
title = {Employment and {{Work Ability}} of {{Persons With Brain Tumors}}: {{A Systematic Review}}},
|
||||
author = {Silvaggi, Fabiola and Leonardi, Matilde and Raggi, Alberto and Eigenmann, Michela and Mariniello, Arianna and Silvani, Antonio and Lamperti, Elena and Schiavolin, Silvia},
|
||||
year = {2020},
|
||||
month = oct,
|
||||
journal = {Frontiers in Human Neuroscience},
|
||||
volume = {14},
|
||||
issn = {1662-5161},
|
||||
doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2020.571191},
|
||||
abstract = {Brain tumors (BT) are between the eight most common cancers among persons aged 40 years, with an average survival time of 10 years for patients affected by non-malignant brain tumor. Some patients continue to work, reporting difficulties in work-related activities, or even job loss. The purpose of the present study was to review the existing information about the ability people with BT to return to work and to identify factors associated with job loss. We performed a systematic review on SCOPUS and EMBASE for peer-reviewed papers that reported studies assessing work ability in patients with BT that were published in the period from January 2010 to January 2020. Out of 800 identified records, 7 articles were selected for analysis, in which 1,507 participants with BT were enrolled overall. Three main themes emerged: the impact of neuropsychological functioning on work productivity, the change of employment status for long-term survivors and issues related to return to work processes. Based on the results of selected studies, it can be concluded that the impact of BT on workforce participation is determined by depressive symptoms and cognitive deficits, as well as by high short-term mortality but also on environmental barriers. Vocational Rehabilitation programs should be implemented to help patients wishing to return to or maintain their current work, as much as possible.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::disability,out::title,outcome::employment,outcome::rtw,review::systematic},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/HY4XHJF5/Silvaggi et al_2020_Employment and Work Ability of Persons With Brain Tumors.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{SilveiraNeto2011,
|
||||
title = {Non-Spatial Government Policies and Regional Income Inequality in Brazil},
|
||||
author = {Silveira Neto, Raul Da M. and Azzoni, Carlos R.},
|
||||
|
|
@ -15911,6 +16388,20 @@ does NOT look at inequality outcomes}
|
|||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/4ZQS8WLS/Slack_2010_Working Poverty across the Metro-Nonmetro Divide.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Slesnick1989,
|
||||
title = {The {{Measurement}} of {{Horizontal Inequality}}},
|
||||
author = {Slesnick, Daniel T.},
|
||||
year = {1989},
|
||||
month = aug,
|
||||
journal = {The Review of Economics and Statistics},
|
||||
volume = {71},
|
||||
number = {3},
|
||||
pages = {481},
|
||||
publisher = {{JSTOR}},
|
||||
doi = {10.2307/1926905},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/ISNJDWTG/Slesnick_1989_The Measurement of Horizontal Inequality.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Slingerland2007,
|
||||
title = {Aging, {{Retirement}}, and {{Changes}} in {{Physical Activity}}: {{Prospective Cohort Findings}} from the {{GLOBE Study}}},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Aging, {{Retirement}}, and {{Changes}} in {{Physical Activity}}},
|
||||
|
|
@ -17694,6 +18185,21 @@ uses cash benefit to identify `increased need' sample but is not impact study fo
|
|||
does NOT look at specific policy interventions}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Wagstaff1991,
|
||||
title = {On the Measurement of Horizontal Inequity in the Delivery of Health Care},
|
||||
author = {Wagstaff, Adam and {van Doorslaer}, Eddy and Paci, Pierella},
|
||||
year = {1991},
|
||||
month = jul,
|
||||
journal = {Journal of Health Economics},
|
||||
volume = {10},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {169--205},
|
||||
publisher = {{Elsevier BV}},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/0167-6296(91)90003-6},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/3X5A9AZ6/Wagstaff et al_1991_On the measurement of horizontal inequity in the delivery of health care.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Waisman-Nitzan2021,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {``{{It}}'s like a Ramp for a Person in a Wheelchair'': {{Workplace}} Accessibility for Employees with Autism},
|
||||
|
|
@ -52286,6 +52792,26 @@ does NOT look at specific policy intervention}
|
|||
keywords = {inequality::gender,inequality::health,out::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Zeinali2021,
|
||||
title = {The {{Use}} of {{Intersectional Analysis}} in {{Assessing Women}}'s {{Leadership Progress}} in the {{Health Workforce}} in {{LMICs}}: {{A Review}}},
|
||||
author = {Zeinali, Zahra and Muraya, Kui and Molyneux, Sassy and Morgan, Rosemary},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
month = feb,
|
||||
journal = {International Journal of Health Policy and Management},
|
||||
doi = {10.34172/ijhpm.2021.06},
|
||||
abstract = {Background: Human resources are at the heart of health systems, playing a central role in their functionality globally. It is estimated that up to 70{\textbackslash}textbackslash\% of the health workforce are women, however, this pattern is not reflected in the leadership of health systems where women are under-represented. Methods: This systematized review explored the existing literature around women's progress towards leadership in the health sector in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) which has used intersectional analysis. Results: While there are studies that have looked at the inequities and barriers women face in progressing towards leadership positions in health systems within LMICs, none explicitly used an intersectionality framework in their approach. These studies did nevertheless show recurring barriers to health systems leadership created at the intersection of gender and social identities such as professional cadre, race/ethnicity, financial status, and culture. These barriers limit women's access to resources that improve career development, including mentorship and sponsorship opportunities, reduce value, recognition and respect at work for women, and increase the likelihood of women to take on dual burdens of professional work and childcare and domestic work, and, create biased views about effectiveness of men and women's leadership styles. An intersectional lens helps to better understand how gender intersects with other social identities which results in upholding these persisting barriers to career progression and leadership. Conclusion: As efforts to reduce gender inequity in health systems are gaining momentum, it is important to look beyond gender and take into account other intersecting social identities that create unique positionalities of privilege and/or disadvantage. This approach should be adopted across a diverse range of health systems programs and policies in an effort to strengthen gender equity in health and specifically human resources for health (HRH), and improve health system governance, functioning and outcomes. Keywords: Gender, Intersectionality, Health Systems, Health Workforce, Leadership, Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) Copyright: (c) 2021 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Citation: Zeinali Z, Muraya K, Molyneux S, Morgan R. The use of intersectional analysis in assessing women's leadership progress in the health workforce in LMICs: a review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;x(x):x-x. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.06},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::gender,inequality::socio-demographic,intersectional,out::title,review::systematic},
|
||||
note = {systematic review of female leadership in health sector (LMICs) using intersectional analysis
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings: main barriers at intersection of gender and social identity of professional cadre, race/ethnicity, financial status, culture
|
||||
\par
|
||||
channels: limiting women's access to career development resources: mentorship, sponsorship opportunities, reduce value, recognition, respect at work for women
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main barriers: increased likelihood for women to take on 'dual burdens' professional work and childcare/domestic work, biased views effectiveness of men/women's leadership styles.},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/34DLCESV/Zeinali et al_2021_The Use of Intersectional Analysis in Assessing Women's Leadership Progress in.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@incollection{Zeinali2022,
|
||||
title = {Women in {{Health Systems Leadership}}: {{Demystifying}} the {{Labyrinth}}},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Women in {{Health Systems Leadership}}},
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue