professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

chore(notes): Add meeting minutes

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2024-02-09 16:53:50 +01:00
parent 0c06bb012a
commit 7d1652be2e
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
1 changed files with 21 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

23
03-documentation/meeting_2024-02-09.md
View file

@ -2,10 +2,14 @@
achieved:
- [ ] studies screened
- [ ] remaining study batch screened
- added active labour market policy studies
- starting to wrangle synthesis:
- better categorization for some and did dual categorizations, e.g. job search assistance or subsidized employment/wages partly into ALMP
- Moved away again a little from strict framework adherence to make more sense for the synthesis -> workfware programmes
- [ ] focus now:
- table reviewing main findings and strength of evidence
- table reviewing main findings
- screen the remaining 200 studies
- improve the writing on the synthesis itself
- to adhere a little closer to
@ -21,6 +25,21 @@ achieved:
- categories overlap sometimes, of course
- a study on NREGS in India which has minimum wage effects as primary channel
- a study on vocational training which fuses it with workfare program (ALMP)
- I would put the focus on 'per-area' conclusions, not the 'per-study'
- validity visualizations
- built a simple scoring rubric of 0-not fulfilled, 1-implicitly fulfilled, 2-explicitly fulfilled
- internal: (design + method) - (selection bias + measurement bias + confounding bias + performance bias)
- external: (representativeness) - (generalizability concerns + population invalidity + ecological invalidity)
- internal:
- design (observational/qualitative, correlational, causal(quasi-experimental/experimental))
- confounding variable control (no mention, limits mentioned, limits mentioned and explicitly discussed)
- data collection (not mentioned, sources mentioned, sources/sample size/observation-length given)
- statistical control (no robustness checks, data robustness mentioned, explicit robustness checks)
- biases (no mention, possible biases mentioned, explicitly controlled for/influcence explained)
- external:
- generalizability (no mention, implicitly generalizable, explicitly generalizable)
- representativeness of sample (no mention/sub-national, national, regional/global)
- ecological validity (no mention, implicit policy implication, explicit policy implication)
- [ ] TODO
- main findings table still remaining