professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

feat(script): Separate appendix table enumeration

Browse source 
Use A1..A<n> table references for appendix tables.
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2024-02-21 11:33:28 +01:00
parent 2afbae0fc1
commit 5f94649c8f
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
1 changed files with 26 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

35
scoping_review.qmd
View file

@ -11,6 +11,14 @@ geometry:
lang: en lang: en
title: Addressing Inequalities in the World of Work title: Addressing Inequalities in the World of Work
subtitle: Scoping Review on 'What Works' subtitle: Scoping Review on 'What Works'
crossref:
custom:
- kind: float
key: apptbl
latex-env: apptbl
reference-prefix: Table A
space-before-numbering: false
latex-list-of-description: Appendix Table
--- ---
```{python} ```{python}
@ -459,7 +467,7 @@ to arrive at a ranking between 2.0 and 5.0 respectively.
Similarly, the studies are ranked for internal validity using the study design, Similarly, the studies are ranked for internal validity using the study design,
with only quasi-experimental and experimental studies receiving similar rankings between 2.0 and 5.0 depending on the individually applied methods due to their quantifiability, with only quasi-experimental and experimental studies receiving similar rankings between 2.0 and 5.0 depending on the individually applied methods due to their quantifiability,
while observational and qualitative studies go without an internal validity rank (0.0) due to the more contextual nature of their analyses. while observational and qualitative studies go without an internal validity rank (0.0) due to the more contextual nature of their analyses.
For a full list of validity ranks, see @sec-appendix-validity-rankings. For a full list of validity ranks, see @apptbl-validity-external and @apptbl-validity-internal.
## Data ## Data
@ -1777,9 +1785,9 @@ while relying on indicators for measurement which are flexible yet overlapping e
{{< pagebreak >}} {{< pagebreak >}}
# Appendix # Appendix {.appendix .unnumbered}
## Full search query ## Full search query {.unnumbered}
```{python} ```{python}
#| label: full-search-query #| label: full-search-query
@ -1796,7 +1804,9 @@ print(f"""
""") """)
``` ```
## Validity rankings {#sec-appendix-validity-rankings} ## Validity rankings {#sec-appendix-validity-rankings .unnumbered}
::: {#apptbl-validity-external}
| Representativeness | Ranking | | Representativeness | Ranking |
| --- | --- | | --- | --- |
@ -1805,24 +1815,31 @@ print(f"""
| nationally representative survey/dataset | 4.0 | | nationally representative survey/dataset | 4.0 |
| census-based dataset | 5.0 | | census-based dataset | 5.0 |
: External validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017. External validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017.
:::
::: {#apptbl-validity-internal}
| Method | Ranking | | Method | Ranking |
| --- | --- | | --- | --- |
| ordinary least squares | 2.0 | | ordinary least squares & fixed-effects | 2.0 |
| discontinuity matching | 3.0 | | discontinuity matching | 3.0 |
| difference in difference (& triple difference) | 3.0 | | difference in difference (& triple difference) | 3.0 |
| propensity score matching | 3.5 | | propensity score matching | 3.5 |
| instrumental variable | 4.0 | | instrumental variable | 4.0 |
| general method of moments | 4.0 |
| regression discontinuity | 4.5 | | regression discontinuity | 4.5 |
| randomised control trial | 5.0 | | randomised control trial | 5.0 |
: Internal validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017. Internal validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017.
## Extraction matrix :::
## Extraction matrix {.unnumbered}
```{python} ```{python}
#| label: tbl-extraction-matrix #| label: apptbl-extraction-matrix
#| tbl-cap: Extraction matrix #| tbl-cap: Extraction matrix
bib_df bib_df
``` ```