feat(script): Separate appendix table enumeration
Use A1..A<n> table references for appendix tables.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2afbae0fc1
commit
5f94649c8f
1 changed files with 26 additions and 9 deletions
|
@ -11,6 +11,14 @@ geometry:
|
|||
lang: en
|
||||
title: Addressing Inequalities in the World of Work
|
||||
subtitle: Scoping Review on 'What Works'
|
||||
crossref:
|
||||
custom:
|
||||
- kind: float
|
||||
key: apptbl
|
||||
latex-env: apptbl
|
||||
reference-prefix: Table A
|
||||
space-before-numbering: false
|
||||
latex-list-of-description: Appendix Table
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
```{python}
|
||||
|
@ -459,7 +467,7 @@ to arrive at a ranking between 2.0 and 5.0 respectively.
|
|||
Similarly, the studies are ranked for internal validity using the study design,
|
||||
with only quasi-experimental and experimental studies receiving similar rankings between 2.0 and 5.0 depending on the individually applied methods due to their quantifiability,
|
||||
while observational and qualitative studies go without an internal validity rank (0.0) due to the more contextual nature of their analyses.
|
||||
For a full list of validity ranks, see @sec-appendix-validity-rankings.
|
||||
For a full list of validity ranks, see @apptbl-validity-external and @apptbl-validity-internal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Data
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1777,9 +1785,9 @@ while relying on indicators for measurement which are flexible yet overlapping e
|
|||
|
||||
{{< pagebreak >}}
|
||||
|
||||
# Appendix
|
||||
# Appendix {.appendix .unnumbered}
|
||||
|
||||
## Full search query
|
||||
## Full search query {.unnumbered}
|
||||
|
||||
```{python}
|
||||
#| label: full-search-query
|
||||
|
@ -1796,7 +1804,9 @@ print(f"""
|
|||
""")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Validity rankings {#sec-appendix-validity-rankings}
|
||||
## Validity rankings {#sec-appendix-validity-rankings .unnumbered}
|
||||
|
||||
::: {#apptbl-validity-external}
|
||||
|
||||
| Representativeness | Ranking |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
|
@ -1805,24 +1815,31 @@ print(f"""
|
|||
| nationally representative survey/dataset | 4.0 |
|
||||
| census-based dataset | 5.0 |
|
||||
|
||||
: External validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017.
|
||||
External validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017.
|
||||
|
||||
:::
|
||||
|
||||
::: {#apptbl-validity-internal}
|
||||
|
||||
| Method | Ranking |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| ordinary least squares | 2.0 |
|
||||
| ordinary least squares & fixed-effects | 2.0 |
|
||||
| discontinuity matching | 3.0 |
|
||||
| difference in difference (& triple difference) | 3.0 |
|
||||
| propensity score matching | 3.5 |
|
||||
| instrumental variable | 4.0 |
|
||||
| general method of moments | 4.0 |
|
||||
| regression discontinuity | 4.5 |
|
||||
| randomised control trial | 5.0 |
|
||||
|
||||
: Internal validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017.
|
||||
Internal validity ranking. Adapted from @Maitrot2017.
|
||||
|
||||
## Extraction matrix
|
||||
:::
|
||||
|
||||
## Extraction matrix {.unnumbered}
|
||||
|
||||
```{python}
|
||||
#| label: tbl-extraction-matrix
|
||||
#| label: apptbl-extraction-matrix
|
||||
#| tbl-cap: Extraction matrix
|
||||
bib_df
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue