feat(data): Extract Shepherd-Banigan2021

02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib

@@ -11836,7 +11836,7 @@ policy recc:
   usage-count-last-180-days = {1},
   usage-count-since-2013 = {9},
   web-of-science-categories = {Psychiatry; Rehabilitation},
-  keywords = {country::US,inequality::age,inequality::disability,region::NA,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::training},
+  keywords = {country::US,done::extracted,inequality::age,inequality::disability,method::qualitative,region::NA,relevant,type::training},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/3WTR8LUZ/Shepherd-Banigan et al_2021_Experiences of VA vocational and education training and assistance services.pdf}
 }
 

02-data/processed/relevant/Shepherd-Banigan2021.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+author: Shepherd-Banigan, M., Pogoda, T. K., McKenna, K., Sperber, N., & Van Houtven, C. H.
+year: 2021
+title: "Experiences of VA vocational and education training and assistance services: Facilitators and barriers reported by veterans with disabilities"
+publisher: In Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
+uri: https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000437
+pubtype: article
+discipline: psychology
+
+country: United States
+period: 2018
+maxlength:
+targeting: explicit
+group: disabled
+data: interviews
+
+design: qualitative
+method: semi-structured interviews
+sample: 26
+unit: individual
+representativeness: subnational, local
+causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
+
+theory:
+limitations: sample restricted to veterans with caregiver; data provide little evidence for supported employment efficacy
+observation:
+  - intervention: training
+    institutional: 0
+    structural: 0
+    agency: 1
+    inequality: age; disability
+    type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
+    indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
+    measures: rtw
+    findings: vocational and educational services help strengthen individual agency and motivation; potential disability payment loss may impede skills development efforts
+    channels: primary barriers health problems, programmes not accomodating disabled veteran student needs; primary facilitator financial assistance for education and individual motivation
+    direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
+    significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
+
+notes:
+annotation: |
+  A qualitative study on the significance of vocational and educational training provided for disabled veterans in the United States.
+  It finds that both the vocational and educational services help strengthen individual agency, autonomy and motivation but impacts can be dampened if the potential for disability payment loss due to the potential for job acquisition impedes skill development efforts.
+  The primary barriers of return to work efforts identified are an individual's health problems as well as various programmes not acommodating the needs of disabled veteran students,
+  while the primary Facilitators identified are financial assistance provided for education as well as strengthened individual agency through motivation.
+  Some limitations include a possible bias of accommodations required through the sample being restricted to veterans with a caregiver, which often signals more substantial impairments than for a larger training-participatory sample, as well as the data not being able to identify the impact of supported employment.

02-data/supplementary/lib.bib

@@ -12290,7 +12290,7 @@ policy recc:
   usage-count-last-180-days = {1},
   usage-count-since-2013 = {9},
   web-of-science-categories = {Psychiatry; Rehabilitation},
-  keywords = {country::US,inequality::age,inequality::disability,region::NA,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::training},
+  keywords = {country::US,done::extracted,inequality::age,inequality::disability,method::qualitative,region::NA,relevant,type::training},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/3WTR8LUZ/Shepherd-Banigan et al_2021_Experiences of VA vocational and education training and assistance services.pdf}
 }
 

scoping_review.qmd

@@ -771,7 +771,13 @@ For the government benefits, it finds significant variations for the different v
 The authors suggest this shows the primary channel of the programme becoming a benefit trap, with disability being determined by not working and benefits disappearing when participants enter the labour force, creating dependency to the programme as a primary barrier.
 Two limitations of the study are its small sample size due to a low response rate, and an over-representation of racial minorities, women and older persons in the sample mentioned as introducing possible downward bias for measured labour force participation rates.
 
-They thereby not only reinforce their recommendation for strength-based approaches, emphasizing the benefits of work, but also highlight the targeting importance of subsidy programmes in general on the one hand,
+Similarly, @Shepherd-Banigan2021 undertake a qualitative study on the significance of vocational and educational training provided for disabled veterans in the United States.
+It finds that both the vocational and educational services help strengthen individual agency, autonomy and motivation but impacts can be dampened if the potential for disability payment loss due to the potential for job acquisition impedes skill development efforts.
+The primary barriers of return to work efforts identified are an individual's health problems as well as various programmes not acommodating the needs of disabled veteran students,
+while the primary Facilitators identified are financial assistance provided for education as well as strengthened individual agency through motivation.
+Some limitations include a possible bias of accommodations required through the sample being restricted to veterans with a caregiver, which often signals more substantial impairments than for a larger training-participatory sample, as well as the data not being able to identify the impact of supported employment.
+
+Both studies thus not only reinforce recommendations for strength-based approaches, emphasizing the benefits of work, but also highlight the targeting importance of subsidy programmes in general on the one hand,
 in the worst case reducing equity through bad targeting mechanisms,
 and their negative reinforcement effects widening existing inequalities of gender, age and racial discrimination through such targeting on the other.