chore: Import notes to zotero items

03-supplementary_data/lib.bib

@@ -12959,6 +12959,13 @@
   abstract = {The aim of this scoping review is to explore previous scientific studies relating to the scholarly understanding of societal participation of people with disabilities. Six relevant databases within social science were searched using societal participation of people with disabilities, or different combinations thereof, as search words. The criteria for inclusion were: working-age people with disabilities; societal participation; accounting for facilitators or/and barriers of participation; geographical focus on or link to Europe, peer-reviewed studies using quantitative or qualitative methods published in English between January 2012 and December 2013. Thirty-two studies met these inclusion criteria. Each study was analysed relating to four measures: identity of the participator group, type of participation; type of facilitators; type of barriers. The findings show that there is a dominating focus on labour market participation and that societal participation was studied mostly concerning disabled people in general instead of any specific group. The main barriers identified were related to financial factors, attitudes, health issues and unemployment. The most frequently identified facilitators were related to legislation and disability policies, as well as to support from people in close contact with disabled people, attitudes in society and employment opportunities for people with disabilities. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Association ALTER.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::disability,integrated,outcome::employment,outcome::social,outcome::wage,relevant,review::scoping,snowball\_source},
+  note = {scoping review of linkages between societal participation and people with disabilities for identity of participant, type of participation, type of facilitators and barriers; focus on European countries (n=32, between 2012-2013)
+\par
+main findings: strongest focus on labour market participation; social participation viewed through lens of disabled people as one group instead of intersectional
+\par
+main barriers: financial factors, attitudes, health issues, unemployment
+\par
+main facilitators: legislation and disability policies; support from people in close contact with disabled people, attitudes in society and employment opportunities for people with disabilities},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/4C8EVVV6/Hastbacka et al_2016_Barriers and facilitators to societal participation of people with disabilities.pdf}
 }
 
@@ -16499,6 +16506,25 @@
   abstract = {Supported employment is an evidence-based practice with a well-established research base. Most studies track such outcomes as employment rates, time to employment and wages earned. Few studies address client and contextual factors that impact outcomes or consider program elements beyond those that comprise the individual placement and support model. This paper reviews existing literature to shed light on the following questions: (1) What impact do labour market trends have on the effectiveness of SE? (2) How lasting are the effects of SE and what factors influence longevity of SE effects? (3) What levels and types of employment are targeted by SE? (4) What are the characteristics of people who benefit from SE? (5) What is the role of peer support in SE? and (6) What are the barriers to effective SE implementation? Research findings are synthesized and suggestions for service enhancements are offered so that the model can continue to evolve.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::age,inequality::disability,inequality::gender,integrated,intervention::employment\_support,outcome::employment,outcome::job\_quality,relevant,review::narrative,snowball\_source},
+  note = {review of factors influencing LM outcomes of supported employment interventions for people with disabilities
+\par
+main findings:
+\par
+- most employment support literature only looks at overall efficacy of interventions, with little prudence for intersectional inequality variations
+\par
+inequalities:
+\par
+- men more likely to be employed (argue possibly due to manual labour of many jobs)
+\par
+- older people less likely to be employed (age+, change-)
+\par
+- older women more likely to be employed than men
+\par
+- education very important in employment outcomes
+\par
+policy recc:
+\par
+- vocational rehabilitation},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/6PID2PJX/Kirsh_2016_Client, Contextual and Program Elements Influencing Supported Employment.pdf}
 }
 
@@ -17293,6 +17319,19 @@
   abstract = {Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the themes of relationship between female labor force participation (FLFP) and economic growth, gender disparity in work participation; and to identify the factors which determine females to participate in labor market. The paper uses a framework incorporating a U-shaped relationship between FLFP and economic growth, gender wise wage disparity and economic, social, cultural and other factors which affects FLFP. Design/methodology/approach Thematically, the selected literature falls into three main categories: the relationship between FLFP and economic growth; disparity in work participation in terms of male and female wages; and drivers or determinants of FLFP which have been described using international documents and experiences of the different countries. The review closes by identifying gaps in the existing research base and by suggesting areas for inquiry that have been untouched and warrant further research. Findings The key findings emerging from this examination of literature show that the FLFP rate exhibits a U-shaped during the process of economic development. Also, there are evidences of gender pay disparity across the sectors which have been justified by documenting a large number of existing literatures. Demographic factors (including fertility, migration, marriages and child care), economic factors (including unemployment, per capita income, non-farm job and infrastructure) and other explanatory variables which include the regulatory context encompassing family and childcare policies, tax regimes, and presence of subsidized health-care for workers determine the FLFP. Practical implications This paper suggests that in order to bring equality in gender pay gap, there is a requirement of replacing the traditional value system. There is need to provide an environment in which women are encouraged and supported in their efforts, in which women have equitable access to resources and opportunities. Social implications This paper addresses the impact of education, culture and child care subsidies on female labor participation. They positively impact FLFP and such a link has not been sufficiently addressed in prior literature. Originality/value In contrast to previous studies which document a broad-based picture of female work participation, this type of research deals with the link between economic growth and female labor participation, gender wage disparity and determinants of it which has been largely unexplored so far.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::gender,integrated,outcome::labour\_supply,relevant,review::systematic,snowball\_source},
+  note = {systematic review looking at relationship of female labour force participation and economic growth, gender disparity in work participation
+\par
+main findings: U-shaped part. rate; evidence of gender pay disparity across sectors
+\par
+channels affecting FLFP:
+\par
+- demographic factors (fertility, migration, marriages, child care)
+\par
+- economic factors (unemployment, per capita income, non-farm job, infrastructure)
+\par
+- regulatory context (family and childcare policies, tax regimes, presence of subsidized healthcare)
+\par
+policy recc: changes to FLFP require replacement of traditional value system based on inequality of sexes (with females playing subordinate role)},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/5AR58NJ2/Kumari_2018_Economic growth, disparity, and determinants of female labor force participation.pdf}
 }
 
@@ -18128,6 +18167,25 @@
   abstract = {Bringing people with mental illness into employment is a phenomenon that has been extensively researched in recent years. A review to identify and synthesize available evidence on bringing this group into employment and the potential fields of interest related to barriers and facilitators has been carried out. The electronic search was done using 17 databases. In total 24 publications of systematic reviews, meta-analysis and meta-ethnographies aimed at individuating and systematizing barriers to work inclusion were included. The different process phases and the variety of circumstances that can slow down or push towards a certain condition of job seeker or employee, together with the rest of the results presented in this work, demonstrate the need to re-direct or extend the research focus related to this issue.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::disability,integrated,intervention::employment\_support,intervention::therapy,intervention::training,outcome::employment,outcome::job\_quality,relevant,review::meta,snowball\_source},
+  note = {meta-review of barriers (and drivers) of inclusion into the labour market for people with disabilities (mental illness)
+\par
+main findings: employment outcomes seem increased for individuals able to hide their mental illness, practice of concealment of identity
+\par
+channels:
+\par
+- prejudices: of missing skills, danger, unpredictability; of hiring as act of charity due to being unproductive; of work stress as contradicting requirements of mental health
+\par
+- discriminatory hiring practices
+\par
+- generally low-skilled individuals due to discrimination/cultural/social barriers for training and work inclusion
+\par
+policy recc:
+\par
+- supported employment (environmental)
+\par
+- cognitive behavioural/computer-assisted therapies (cognitive)
+\par
+- vocational rehabilitation programs (human capital)},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/HLXMGS6S/Lettieri_Diez Villoria_2017_A Systematization of the International Evidence Related to Labor Inclusion.pdf}
 }
 
@@ -21962,6 +22020,15 @@
   abstract = {Purpose A systematic review was conducted to review the effectiveness of workplace accommodation (WA) regarding employment, work ability, and cost-benefit among disabled people. It also describes the evidence gained on the barriers and facilitators of WA process to sustain employment. Methods We reviewed systematically current scientific evidence about effectiveness of WA among disabled persons. The outcomes were employment, work ability, and cost-benefit. Qualitative studies of employment facilitators and barriers were also included. The population comprised people with physical disability, visual impairment, hearing impairment, cognitive disability, or mental disability, aged 18-68 years. CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medic, OTseeker, PEDro, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1990 to November 2012. Results Three quantitative (one randomized controlled, one concurrently controlled, and one cohort) and eight qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. There was moderate evidence that specific types of WA (vocational counselling and guidance, education and self-advocacy, help of others, changes in work schedules, work organization, and special transportation) promote employment among physically disabled persons and reduce costs. There was low evidence that WA (liaison, education, work aids, and work techniques) coordinated by case managers increases return to work and is cost-effective when compared with the usual care of persons with physical and cognitive disabilities. The key facilitators and barriers of employment were self-advocacy, support of the employer and community, amount of training and counselling, and flexibility of work schedules and work organization. Conclusions More high-quality studies using validated measures of the work ability and functioning of disabled persons are needed. The identified barriers and facilitators found in the qualitative studies should be used to develop quantitative study designs.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::disability,integrated,outcome::employment,outcome::rtw,relevant,review::systematic,snowball\_source},
+  note = {systematic review looking at effectiveness of workplace accommodation (vocational counselling/guidance, education/self-advocacy, help of others, changes in work schedules, work organization, special transportation) on employment, work ability, cost-benefit, rtw (n=11)
+\par
+main findings:
+\par
+- moderate evidence that employment among physically disabled persons promoted by: vocational counselling/guidance, education/self-advocacy, help of others, changes in work schedules, work organisation, special transportation
+\par
+- low evidence that rtw increased for physical/cognitive disabilities by: liaison (btw employer and other professionals), education, work aids, work techniques
+\par
+barrier/facilitators: self-advocacy, support of employer and community, amount of training/counselling, flexibility of work schedules/organisation},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/V3KT5P2Z/Nevala et al_2015_Workplace Accommodation Among Persons with Disabilities.pdf}
 }
 
@@ -26127,6 +26194,17 @@ migration.},
   abstract = {People with disabilities are generally not considered as able participants in the workforce (paid or volunteer work) and therefore, they often experience exclusion from participating in mainstream employment opportunities. People with disabilities experience various barriers to employment, such as discrimination in the workplace, stigma, prejudice and stereotypes. However, some people with disabilities participate in the workforce and make valuable contributions towards economic development, social capital and wider society. This literature review summarises published research findings about the challenges that people with disabilities experience in pursuing employment opportunities, including volunteering and paid positions; and in undertaking these roles. Furthermore, it explores possible interventions to improve employment outcomes that are effective from the perspectives of people with disabilities. Findings indicate that effective practice takes an inclusive approach and allows clients to take ownership of solutions in relation to addressing the challenges they experience in the employment sector. For this reason, two different community development projects, which particularly focused on employment challenges for people with disabilities, as well as outlining strategies and solutions that promote client ownership were reviewed. Additionally, employment support techniques and strategies, as well as human rights' principles on work and employment for people with disabilities will be debated. Finally, implications for research and practice for the rehabilitation counselling profession and the disability employment services sector are discussed.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::disability,integrated,outcome::employment,outcome::job\_quality,relevant,review::narrative,snowball\_source},
+  note = {(narrative) review of barriers to workforce inclusion (paid/volunteer work) for people with disabilities; summary of findings
+\par
+main findings:
+\par
+- "effective practice takes an inclusive approach and allows clients to take ownership of solutions in relation to addressing the challenges they experience in the employment sector"
+\par
+policy recc:
+\par
+- employment support practices
+\par
+- campaigns to encourage disclosing disability},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/4ET6ZSWM/Ruhindwa et al_2016_Exploring the challenges experienced by people with disabilities in the.pdf}
 }
 
@@ -29093,6 +29171,15 @@ migration.},
   abstract = {This article presents evidence supporting the hypothesis that promoting gender equality and women's and girls' empowerment (GEWE) leads to better health and development outcomes. We reviewed the literature across six sectors-family planning (FP); maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH); nutrition; agriculture; water, sanitation and hygiene; and financial services for the poor-and found 76 studies from low and middle-income countries that met our inclusion criteria. Across these studies, we identified common GEWE variables that emerged repeatedly as significant predictors of sector outcomes. We grouped these variables into 10 thematic categories, which we termed \textbackslash textasciigravegender-related levers'. These levers were then classified by the strength of evidence into Wedges, Foundations and Facilitators. Wedges are gender-related levers that had strong associations with improved outcomes across multiple sectors. They include: \textbackslash textasciigravecontrol over income/assets/resources', \textbackslash textasciigravedecision-making power' and \textbackslash textasciigraveeducation'. Elements of these levers overlap, but combined, they encapsulate agency. Increasing female agency promotes equality and broadly improves health and development for women, their families and their communities. The second classification, Foundations, displayed strong, positive associations across FP, MNCH and nutrition. Foundations have a more proximal relationship with sector outcomes and include: \textbackslash textasciigraveequitable interpersonal relationships', \textbackslash textasciigravemobility' and \textbackslash textasciigravepersonal safety'. Finally, the third group of levers, Facilitators, was associated with improved outcomes in two to three sectors and include: \textbackslash textasciigraveaccess to information', \textbackslash textasciigravecommunity groups', \textbackslash textasciigravepaid labour' and \textbackslash textasciigraverights'. These levers make it easier for women and girls to achieve their goals and are more traditional elements of development programmes. Overall, gender-related levers were associated with improvements in a variety of health and development outcomes. Furthermore, these associations were cross-sectoral, suggesting that to fully realize the benefits of promoting GEWE, the development community must collaborate in co-ordinated and integrated ways across multiple sectors. More research is needed to identify the mechanisms by which gendered interventions work and under what circumstances.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::gender,integrated,outcome::health,review::narrative,snowball\_source},
+  note = {(narrative?) review of effects of dimensions of female 'empowerment' on health outcomes and development outcomes, such as access to and use of financial services
+\par
+main findings:
+\par
+- gender inequalities highly contextual (and intersectional), requires identification of variations at start of interventions where inequalities exist, overlap and work as barriers to its implementation
+\par
+- strong association with improved outcomes across multiple outcome sectors: control over income/assets/resources, decision-making power, education
+\par
+- relation with health/family planning outcomes: mobility, personal safety, equitable interpersonal relationships},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/9WPGW57Z/Taukobong et al_2016_Does addressing gender inequalities and empowering women and girls improve.pdf}
 }
 
@@ -29819,6 +29906,21 @@ migration.},
   abstract = {The implications of technology adoption for productivity, income, and welfare have been studied widely in the context of less developed countries (LDCs). In contrast, the relationship between technology adoption and employment has attracted less interest. This systematic review evaluates the diverse yet sizeable evidence base that has remained below the radars of both reviewers and policy makers. We map the qualitative and empirical evidence and report that the effect of technology adoption on employment is skill biased and more likely to be observed when technology adoption favors product innovation as opposed to process innovation. Technology adoption is also less likely to be associated with employment creation when: (i) the evidence is related to farm employment as opposed to firm/industry employment; (ii) the evidence is related to low-income countries as opposed to lower middle-income or mixed countries; and (iii) the evidence is based on post-2001 data as opposed to pre-2001 data. There is also qualitative evidence indicating that international trade, weak forward and backward linkages, and weaknesses in governance and labor-market institutions tend to weaken the job creating effects of technology adoption. We conclude by calling for compilation of better quality survey data and further attention to sources of heterogeneity in modeling the relationship between technology adoption and employment in LDCs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
   langid = {english},
   keywords = {inequality::income,integrated,intervention::technology\_adoption,outcome::employment,relevant,review::systematic,snowball\_source},
+  note = {systematic review of effects of technology adoption on employment (in LMIC/LIC 'less developed countries')
+\par
+main findings: positive effect more likely when technology adoption favours product innovation not process innovation and when it is is skill based
+\par
+additional:
+\par
+- techn. adoption *less* likely to create employment when: related to farm employment not firm/industry employment; related to low-income countries not LMICs; related to data from after 2001 instead of pre-2001
+\par
+- intl trade, weak forward/backward linkages, weaknesses in governance \& labor market institutions can weak job-creating effects of technology adoption
+\par
+inequality:
+\par
+- existing income inequalities makes effect of technology adoption on employment creation more ambiguous (potentially widening rift of demand for skilled versus unskilled labour)
+\par
+- green revolution technologies tend to reduce income/wealth inequality; also negative effect on on-farm employment},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/P6MZJ39B/Ugur_Mitra_2017_Technology Adoption and Employment in Less Developed Countries.pdf}
 }