chore(script): De-indent intervention headlines

Until we have thematic areas, de-indent the individual headlines for the time being.

02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib

@@ -12314,7 +12314,7 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
   doi = {10.1515/bis-2015-0021},
   urldate = {2023-11-20},
   abstract = {Abstract             This article argues that the emancipatory value of a basic income is greater than its monetary value, drawing on the results of a large-scale basic income scheme conducted in the Indian State of Madhya Pradesh between 2010 and 2013. The scheme was evaluated by comparing households in villages where everyone received a small cash payment each month with households in similar villages where no one did. The evaluation results showed much stronger than anticipated benefits of a very modest basic income, equivalent to about a third of subsistence. It is argued here that this arises because cash payments alleviate the contrived scarcity of money itself, a cause of chronic indebtedness and impoverishment. Using data and illustrative case studies on debt, savings and financial inclusion, the article demonstrates how a basic income improves economic security beyond its monetary value, which can be termed its emancipatory value. It further concludes that a basic income would have an emancipatory effect for the growing precariat around the world.},
-  keywords = {country::India,inequality::income,region::AP,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::ubi},
+  keywords = {country::India,done::extracted,inequality::income,region::AP,relevant,type::ubi},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/8E2XT9UK/Standing_2015_Why Basic Income’s Emancipatory Value Exceeds Its Monetary Value.pdf}
 }
 

02-data/processed/relevant/Standing2015.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+author: Standing, G. 
+year: 2015
+title: "Why Basic Income’s Emancipatory Value Exceeds Its Monetary Value"
+publisher: Basic Income Studies
+uri: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2015-0021
+pubtype: article
+discipline: economics
+
+country: India
+period: 2010-2013
+maxlength: 18
+targeting: implicit
+group: low-income households
+data: baseline & 3 follow-up surveys and censuses; structured interviews
+
+design: experimental
+method: rural pilot project trial, 18/12 months of ubi provision with follow up surveys and interviews
+sample: 1665
+unit: household
+representativeness: subnational, rural
+causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
+
+theory: Lauderdale paradox (money, if scarce becomes even more valuable resource)
+limitations:
+observation:
+  - intervention: ubi
+    institutional: 1
+    structural: 0
+    agency: 1
+    inequality: income
+    type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
+    indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
+    measures: debt
+    findings: ubi significantly decreases debts; results go beyond direct monetary value; households did not have to work for lenders/to pay off debt
+    channels: directly enables debt reduction; reduces debt-dependency risks; avoids taking on new debt; enables choosing less exploitative forms of borrowing
+    direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
+    significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
+  - intervention: ubi
+    institutional: 1
+    structural: 0
+    agency: 1
+    inequality: income
+    type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
+    indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
+    measures: saving
+    findings: ubi significantly increases savings; allowed increasing economic security/empowerment of households
+    channels: shift to institutionalized saving strengthening shock resilience; schooling of the household head, landholding, caste and household size also affect savings
+    direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
+    significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
+
+notes: ubi paid in addition to any other state transfers
+annotation: |
+  An experimental study on the effects of providing UBI for villages in India on absolute low-income household debts, utilizing a combination of qualitative and quantitative experimental research.
+  It finds that the provision of UBI significantly reduced household debts, finding generally agreeing with assumptions in the literature, but goes beyond this by investigating the qualitative causes going beyond purely monetary value into what the authors call 'emancipatory value'.
+  They find UBI reduces dependency risk - primarily to lenders with high associated fees by allowing the repayment of existing debt, not having to work for the lender directly or by providing them parts of their wages, avoiding taking on new debts and, if new debts have to be taken on, allows choosing less exploitative forms of borrowing (such as from relatives or friends).
+  The last channel especially is a point of interest of the study: the intervention did not just reduce absolute debts through an individual possessing more money, it generally infused more money into the local contexts, reducing its scarcity and allowing others such as neighbors and friends to provide more collective risk spreading in the villages..
+  The intervention also significantly increased possibility of saving in treatment households, allowing for an increased economic security and empowerment, which was also influenced by houshold head education, landholding, the household's caste and size.
+  The main channel this is accomplished through is a shift to institutionalized saving, with provides increased resilience against shock events.

02-data/supplementary/lib.bib

@@ -12805,7 +12805,7 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
   doi = {10.1515/bis-2015-0021},
   urldate = {2023-11-20},
   abstract = {Abstract             This article argues that the emancipatory value of a basic income is greater than its monetary value, drawing on the results of a large-scale basic income scheme conducted in the Indian State of Madhya Pradesh between 2010 and 2013. The scheme was evaluated by comparing households in villages where everyone received a small cash payment each month with households in similar villages where no one did. The evaluation results showed much stronger than anticipated benefits of a very modest basic income, equivalent to about a third of subsistence. It is argued here that this arises because cash payments alleviate the contrived scarcity of money itself, a cause of chronic indebtedness and impoverishment. Using data and illustrative case studies on debt, savings and financial inclusion, the article demonstrates how a basic income improves economic security beyond its monetary value, which can be termed its emancipatory value. It further concludes that a basic income would have an emancipatory effect for the growing precariat around the world.},
-  keywords = {country::India,inequality::income,region::AP,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::ubi},
+  keywords = {country::India,done::extracted,inequality::income,region::AP,relevant,type::ubi},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/8E2XT9UK/Standing_2015_Why Basic Income’s Emancipatory Value Exceeds Its Monetary Value.pdf}
 }