professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(script): Add missing Rosen2014 annotation

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2023-12-12 08:47:24 +01:00
parent 30d059d68b
commit 26afa3b8ea
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: EDBF2ED917B2EF6A
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

5
scoping_review.qmd
View file

@ -842,6 +842,11 @@ The primary barriers of return to work efforts identified are an individual's he
while the primary Facilitators identified are financial assistance provided for education as well as strengthened individual agency through motivation.
Some limitations include a possible bias of accommodations required through the sample being restricted to veterans with a caregiver, which often signals more substantial impairments than for a larger training-participatory sample, as well as the data not being able to identify the impact of supported employment.
An experimental study on the impacts of benefits and vocational training counseling for disabled veterans in the United States by @Rosen2014 measures the effects on return to work through average hours worked.
It identifies time worked through a timeline follow-back calendar, measuring the change in days worked in the 28 days preceding the final study measurement.
Here, it finds the sessions having a significant increase on more waged days worked, with an additional three days for the 28 preceding days on average.
One limitation is the inability of the study to locate an active ingredient:
Though the intervention clearly aims at strengthening some aspect of individual agency, the exact mediators are not clear, with neither beliefs about work, beliefs about benefits, nor provided service use for mental health or substance abuse impacted significantly.
The studies thus not only reinforce recommendations for strength-based approaches, emphasizing the benefits of work, but also highlight the targeting importance of subsidy programmes in general on the one hand,
in the worst case reducing equity through bad targeting mechanisms,