fix(data): Fix wrong data entries, improve wording
This commit is contained in:
parent
14878c571e
commit
1f116dedef
6 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions
|
|
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ method: general equilibrium model, microeconometric simulation model
|
|||
sample: 30000
|
||||
unit: household
|
||||
representativeness: national
|
||||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory: human capital theory
|
||||
limitations: analytical household-level limitations; no indirect cost-effects able to be accounted for; static model
|
||||
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
direction: -1
|
||||
significance: 2
|
||||
|
||||
notes: study attempts to explictly account for spillover effects
|
||||
notes: study attempts to explictly account for spillover effects and capture conditionality for school attendance
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study looking at the impact of the cash transfer programme Oportunidades in Mexico, conditioned on a household's children school attendance, on income inequality among others.
|
||||
It finds that a combination of effects raises the average income of the poorest households by 23 percent.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
author: Li, Y., & Sunder, N.
|
||||
author: Li, Y., & Sunder, N.
|
||||
year: 2022
|
||||
title: Land inequality and workfare policies
|
||||
publisher: Journal of development studies
|
||||
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study on the effects of previous inequalities on the outcomes of a work programme in India intended to provide job opportunity equality for already disadvantages population.
|
||||
It specifically looks at the NREGA programme in India, and takes the land-ownership inequality measured through the Gini coefficient as its preceding inequality.[^nrega]
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,5 +46,5 @@ annotation: |
|
|||
They suggest that in more inequally distributed channels the landlords can use a more unequal power structure to lobby and effect political power decreasing the effectiveness of the programmes,
|
||||
in addition to often reduced collective bargaining power on the side of labour in these districts.
|
||||
The results show the same trends for measurement of land inequality using the share of land owned by the top 10 per cent largest holdings instead.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[^nrega]: The National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (NREGA) is a workfare programme implemented in India, the largest of its kind, which seeks to provide 100 days of employment for each household per year. It was rolled out from 2005 over several phases until it reached all districts in India in 2008.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
author: Wang, J., & Van Vliet, O.
|
||||
author: Wang, J., & Van Vliet, O.
|
||||
year: 2016
|
||||
title: "Social Assistance and Minimum Income Benefits: Benefit Levels, Replacement Rates and Policies Across 26 Oecd Countries, 1990-2009"
|
||||
publisher: European Journal of Social Security
|
||||
|
|
@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ discipline: economics
|
|||
|
||||
country: global
|
||||
period: 1990-2009
|
||||
maxlength:
|
||||
maxlength:
|
||||
targeting: implicit
|
||||
group: low-income
|
||||
data: World Bank CPI indicators; Penn World Table
|
||||
data: World Bank CPI indicators & Penn World Table; Social Assistance and Minimum Income Protection Dataset (Nelson, 2013)
|
||||
|
||||
design: observational
|
||||
method: cross-country comparative analysis
|
||||
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ representativeness: national
|
|||
causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: data availability necessitated indicator construction for real minimum benefits and replacement rates
|
||||
limitations: some effects may stem from exchange rate/PPP changes instead
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: direct transfer (social assistance)
|
||||
institutional: 1
|
||||
|
|
@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ observation:
|
|||
indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: real wage; replacement rate
|
||||
findings: real benefit levels increased in most countries, benefit levels increasing more than consumer prices; income replacement rates mixed outcomes with decreases in some countries where real benefit levels increased
|
||||
channels: bulk of increases comes from deliberate policy changes; benefit levels not linked to wages and policy changes not taking into account changes in wages
|
||||
channels: bulk of increases comes from deliberate policy changes; but benefit levels not linked to wages and policy changes not taking into account changes in wages
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
||||
notes:
|
||||
notes: due to data availability indicator for real minimum benefits and replacement rates could be constructed for 26 OECD countries
|
||||
annotation: |
|
||||
An observational study on the levels of social assistance benefits and wages in a national comparative study within 26 developed countries.
|
||||
An observational study on the levels of social assistance benefits and wages in a national comparative study within 26 OECD countries.
|
||||
It finds that real minimum income benefit levels generally increased in most countries from 1990 to 2009, with only a few countries, mostly in Eastern European welfare states, showing decreases during the time frame.
|
||||
The majority of changes in real benefit levels are from deliberate policy changes and the study calculates them by a comparison of the changes in benefit levels to the changes in consumer prices.
|
||||
Secondly, it finds that changes for income replacement rates are more mixed, with rates decreasing even in some countries which have increasing real benefits levels.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue