fix(data): Fix wrong data entries, improve wording
This commit is contained in:
parent
14878c571e
commit
1f116dedef
6 changed files with 21 additions and 21 deletions
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
type: # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: political power
|
||||
findings: more unequal distribution of
|
||||
findings: more unequal political power distribution hinders processes of collective organisation
|
||||
channels:
|
||||
direction: # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
author: Alexiou, C., & Trachanas, E.
|
||||
author: Alexiou, C., & Trachanas, E.
|
||||
year: 2023
|
||||
title: "The impact of trade unions and government party orientation on income inequality: Evidence from 17 OECD economies"
|
||||
publisher: Journal of Economic Studies
|
||||
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
type: # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: Gini coeff
|
||||
findings: unionization strongly related with decreasing income inequalityi; right-wing institutional contexts related with increased income inequality
|
||||
findings: unionization strongly related with decreasing income inequality; right-wing institutional contexts related with increased income inequality
|
||||
channels: redistribution of political power under unions; weak unionization increases post-redistribution inequality
|
||||
direction: # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
|
@ -40,6 +40,6 @@ notes: PRELIMINARY EXTRACTION
|
|||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study on the effects of both political orientation of governments' parties and a country's trade unionization on its income inequality.
|
||||
It finds that, generally, strong unionization is strongly related to decreasing income inequality, most likely through a redistribution of political power through collective mobilization in national contexts of stronger unions.
|
||||
It also suggests that in contexts of weaker unionization, post-redistribution income inequality is higher, thus also fostering unequal redistributive policies.
|
||||
It also suggests that in contexts of weaker unionization, post-redistribution income inequality is higher, thus also fostering unequal redistributive policies.
|
||||
Lastly, it finds positive relations between right-wing orientation of a country's government and its income inequality, with more mixed results for centrist governments pointing to potential fragmentations in their redistributive policy approaches.
|
||||
The study is mostly limited in not being able to account for individual drivers (or barriers) and can thus not disaggregate for the effects for example arbitration or collective bargaining.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
author: Ferguson, J.-P.
|
||||
author: Ferguson, J.-P.
|
||||
year: 2015
|
||||
title: "The control of managerial discretion: Evidence from unionization’s impact on employment segregation"
|
||||
publisher: American Journal of Sociology
|
||||
|
|
@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ method:
|
|||
sample:
|
||||
unit:
|
||||
representativeness:
|
||||
causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||||
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
theory:
|
||||
limitations: most of effects may be caused by unsobservables
|
||||
observation:
|
||||
- intervention: collective action (unionization)
|
||||
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ observation:
|
|||
type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||||
indicator: 0 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||||
measures: employment
|
||||
findings: stronger unionization associated with more women and minorities in management, marginally significant
|
||||
findings: stronger unionization associated with more women and minorities in management, but only marginally significant
|
||||
channels: possible self-selection into unionization
|
||||
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||||
significance: 1 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||||
|
|
@ -40,6 +40,6 @@ notes: PRELIMINARY EXTRACTION;
|
|||
annotation: |
|
||||
A study on the effects of a more unionized workforce in the United States, on the representation of women and minorities in the management of enterprises.
|
||||
It finds that while stronger unionization is associated both with more women and more minorities represented in the overall workforce and in management, this effect is only marginally significant.
|
||||
Additionally, there are drivers which may be based on unobservables and not a direct effect ---
|
||||
Additionally, there are drivers which may be based on unobservables and not a direct effect ---
|
||||
it may be a selection effect of more unionized enterprises.
|
||||
It uses union elections as its base of analysis, and thus can not exclude self-selection effects of people joining more heavily unionized enterprises rather than unionization increasing representation in its conclusions.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue