chore(data): Re-integrate previous reviews into bibtex
This commit is contained in:
parent
6f1ce1f8b5
commit
12964bade3
3 changed files with 611 additions and 391 deletions
|
|
@ -2360,6 +2360,23 @@ does NOT look at inequalities affected}
|
|||
langid = {english}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Chang2021,
|
||||
title = {Women's and {{Employers}}' {{Experiences}} and {{Views}} of {{Combining Breastfeeding}} with a {{Return}} to {{Paid Employment}}: {{A Systematic Review}} of {{Qualitative Studies}}},
|
||||
author = {Chang, Yan-Shing and Harger, Laura and Beake, Sarah and Bick, Debra},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
month = sep,
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY WOMENS HEALTH},
|
||||
volume = {66},
|
||||
number = {5},
|
||||
pages = {641--655},
|
||||
issn = {1526-9523},
|
||||
doi = {10.1111/jmwh.13243},
|
||||
abstract = {Introduction Returning to paid employment is one of the reasons women stop breastfeeding earlier than they planned to. This systematic review aimed to provide insight into the experiences and views of women and employers on breastfeeding and returning to paid employment, with findings used to inform practice and policy. Methods The review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published in English. JBI's meta-aggregative approach informed data analysis. The studies in this analysis included women who stopped breastfeeding before, and those who continued breastfeeding after, returning to paid employment and the employers, work managers, or supervisors of women who continued breastfeeding after returning to paid employment. Results Twenty-six articles presenting findings from 25 studies were included and critically appraised. Synthesized findings showed that women experienced physical and emotional difficulties and described gender and employment inequalities in accessing and receiving the support they needed. Women reported that the importance of their own motivation and having workplace legislation in place facilitated breastfeeding during employment. Support from employers, colleagues, and family members, as well as access to convenient child care, helped women continue breastfeeding on return to paid employment. Employers' personal experiences influenced their views on breastfeeding and working, and the need for more education and communication between employers and employers on breastfeeding in the workplace was recognized. Discussion Support from family, work colleagues, and employers was important to reduce the physical and emotional challenges women experienced when combing breastfeeding with return to paid employment. Gender inequalities, especially in low- and middle-income countries, in accessing support exacerbated the difficulties women experienced. Limited data were identified regarding employers' experiences and views, suggesting an urgent need for further research to explore employers' and work colleagues' experiences and views.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::gender,method::qualitative,out::title,outcome::health,outcome::rtw,review::qualitative,review::systematic,snowball\_source,TODO::review},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/NNBJSYFS/Chang et al_2021_Women's and Employers' Experiences and Views of Combining Breastfeeding with a.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Chao2022,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {Minimum Wage, Firm Dynamics, and Wage Inequality: {{Theory}} and Evidence},
|
||||
|
|
@ -4601,6 +4618,21 @@ does NOT look at inequalities affected}
|
|||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/6MWD6MCF/Finlay_Lee_2018_Identifying Causal Effects of Reproductive Health Improvements on Women's.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Finlay2021,
|
||||
title = {Women's Reproductive Health and Economic Activity: {{A}} Narrative Review},
|
||||
author = {Finlay, Jocelyn E.},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
month = mar,
|
||||
journal = {WORLD DEVELOPMENT},
|
||||
volume = {139},
|
||||
issn = {0305-750X},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105313},
|
||||
abstract = {This paper provides a narrative review of the literature that addresses the connection between women's reproductive health and women's economic activity. Women's reproductive health, gender equality and decent work, are all part of the Sustainable Development Goals and this review highlights how these Goals are interconnected. The review focuses on the relationship between fertility and women's work and provides a detailed discussion of the academic literature that identifies the causal effect of fertility on changes in female labor force participation. Fertility is captured by timing, spacing and number of chil-dren, and career advancement, job quality, and hours worked are addressed on the work side. The review contrasts the fertility-work nexus for low-, middle-and high-income countries separately, recognizing national income per capita as a moderator of the effect of fertility on female labor force participation. In low-income countries, where labor force participation is for the most part in the informal sector, women must adopt their own strategies for balancing child rearing and labor force participation, such as selection of job type, relying on other women in the household for childcare, and birth spacing to limit infants in their care. In middle-income countries, women juggle child rearing and labor force participation with the overarching issue of income inequality, and early childbearing and lone motherhood perpetuate poverty. For women in high-income countries, social protection policies can assist women in managing the balance of childrearing and work, but these policies do not address underlying issues of gender inequality. Despite these policies, career advancement is interrupted by childbearing. As the relationship between fertility and women's work varies by income per capita across countries, polices that support women in achieving balance in their desired family size and accessing decent work varies across countries. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::gender,inequality::health,out::title,review::narrative,snowball\_source},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/7GFBLXCK/Finlay_2021_Women's reproductive health and economic activity.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Fitchen1995,
|
||||
title = {Spatial {{Redistribution}} of {{Poverty}} through {{Migration}} of {{Poor People}} to {{Depressed Rural Communities}} {\textsuperscript{1}}},
|
||||
author = {Fitchen, Janet M.},
|
||||
|
|
@ -7909,6 +7941,35 @@ does NOT look at inequalities affected}
|
|||
langid = {english}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Kumari2018,
|
||||
title = {Economic Growth, Disparity, and Determinants of Female Labor Force Participation: {{A}} Research Agenda},
|
||||
author = {Kumari, Reena},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
journal = {WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT},
|
||||
volume = {14},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {138--152},
|
||||
issn = {2042-5961},
|
||||
doi = {10.1108/WJEMSD-03-2017-0009},
|
||||
abstract = {Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the themes of relationship between female labor force participation (FLFP) and economic growth, gender disparity in work participation; and to identify the factors which determine females to participate in labor market. The paper uses a framework incorporating a U-shaped relationship between FLFP and economic growth, gender wise wage disparity and economic, social, cultural and other factors which affects FLFP. Design/methodology/approach Thematically, the selected literature falls into three main categories: the relationship between FLFP and economic growth; disparity in work participation in terms of male and female wages; and drivers or determinants of FLFP which have been described using international documents and experiences of the different countries. The review closes by identifying gaps in the existing research base and by suggesting areas for inquiry that have been untouched and warrant further research. Findings The key findings emerging from this examination of literature show that the FLFP rate exhibits a U-shaped during the process of economic development. Also, there are evidences of gender pay disparity across the sectors which have been justified by documenting a large number of existing literatures. Demographic factors (including fertility, migration, marriages and child care), economic factors (including unemployment, per capita income, non-farm job and infrastructure) and other explanatory variables which include the regulatory context encompassing family and childcare policies, tax regimes, and presence of subsidized health-care for workers determine the FLFP. Practical implications This paper suggests that in order to bring equality in gender pay gap, there is a requirement of replacing the traditional value system. There is need to provide an environment in which women are encouraged and supported in their efforts, in which women have equitable access to resources and opportunities. Social implications This paper addresses the impact of education, culture and child care subsidies on female labor participation. They positively impact FLFP and such a link has not been sufficiently addressed in prior literature. Originality/value In contrast to previous studies which document a broad-based picture of female work participation, this type of research deals with the link between economic growth and female labor participation, gender wage disparity and determinants of it which has been largely unexplored so far.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::gender,inequality::income,out::abstract,outcome::labour\_supply,review::narrative,review::systematic,snowball\_source,TODO::review},
|
||||
note = {systematic review looking at relationship of female labour force participation and economic growth, gender disparity in work participation
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings: U-shaped part. rate; evidence of gender pay disparity across sectors
|
||||
\par
|
||||
channels affecting FLFP:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- demographic factors (fertility, migration, marriages, child care)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- economic factors (unemployment, per capita income, non-farm job, infrastructure)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- regulatory context (family and childcare policies, tax regimes, presence of subsidized healthcare)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
policy recc: changes to FLFP require replacement of traditional value system based on inequality of sexes (with females playing subordinate role)},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/5AR58NJ2/Kumari_2018_Economic growth, disparity, and determinants of female labor force participation.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Kumari2020,
|
||||
title = {{{COVID-19}} Outbreak and Decreased Hospitalisation of Pregnant Women in Labour},
|
||||
author = {Kumari, Vimla and Mehta, Kalpana and Choudhary, Rahul},
|
||||
|
|
@ -8309,6 +8370,31 @@ however data will be very useful to explore channels of health ineq -{$>$} incom
|
|||
keywords = {out::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Lindsay2018,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {A Systematic Review of the Role of Gender in Securing and Maintaining Employment among Youth and Young Adults with Disabilities},
|
||||
author = {Lindsay, Sally and Cagliostro, Elaine and Albarico, Mikhaela and Srikanthan, Dilakshan and Mortaji, Neda},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
month = jun,
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION},
|
||||
volume = {28},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {232--251},
|
||||
doi = {10.1007/s10926-017-9726-x},
|
||||
abstract = {Purpose There is a critical need for gender-specific vocational supports for young adults with disabilities as they transition to employment. We conducted a systematic review to explore the role of gender in securing and maintaining employment. Methods Systematic searches of seven databases identified 48 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Using a narrative synthesis approach, these studies were analyzed in terms of the characteristics of the participants, methodology, results, and quality of the evidence. Results Among the 48 studies, 112,473 participants (56\% male), mean age (of the total sample) was 21, represented across ten countries. Twenty-one studies reported that young men with disabilities had better employment outcomes than women with disabilities. Eight studies showed that females with disabilities had better employment outcomes than males. Five studies reported that there were no gender differences in employment outcomes for youth with various disabilities. With regards to maintaining employment, men with disabilities often work more hours and have better wages compared to women with disabilities. There are several gender-related barriers and facilitators to maintaining employment including social supports and gender role expectations. Conclusions Our findings highlight that there is a critical need for gender-specific vocational supports for young adults with disabilities.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Lindsay, S (Corresponding Author), Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Bloorview Res Inst, 150 Kilgour Rd, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada. Lindsay, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci \& Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada. Lindsay, Sally; Cagliostro, Elaine; Albarico, Mikhaela; Srikanthan, Dilakshan; Mortaji, Neda, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Bloorview Res Inst, 150 Kilgour Rd, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada. Lindsay, Sally, Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci \& Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada.},
|
||||
author-email = {slindsay@hollandbloorview.ca},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Rehabilitation; Social Issues},
|
||||
times-cited = {22},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000433032900003},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {2},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {19},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Rehabilitation; Social Issues},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::disability,inequality::gender,out::title,review::systematic}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Lindstrom2002,
|
||||
title = {Phases of {{Career Development}}: {{Case Studies}} of {{Young Women}} with {{Learning Disabilities}}},
|
||||
shorttitle = {Phases of {{Career Development}}},
|
||||
|
|
@ -9756,6 +9842,32 @@ does NOT look at results of specific policy interventions}
|
|||
keywords = {issue::age,out::year}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Nevala2015,
|
||||
title = {Workplace {{Accommodation Among Persons}} with {{Disabilities}}: {{A Systematic Review}} of {{Its Effectiveness}} and {{Barriers}} or {{Facilitators}}},
|
||||
author = {Nevala, Nina and Pehkonen, Irmeli and Koskela, Inka and Ruusuvuori, Johanna and Anttila, Heidi},
|
||||
year = {2015},
|
||||
month = jun,
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {432--448},
|
||||
issn = {1053-0487},
|
||||
doi = {10.1007/s10926-014-9548-z},
|
||||
abstract = {Purpose A systematic review was conducted to review the effectiveness of workplace accommodation (WA) regarding employment, work ability, and cost-benefit among disabled people. It also describes the evidence gained on the barriers and facilitators of WA process to sustain employment. Methods We reviewed systematically current scientific evidence about effectiveness of WA among disabled persons. The outcomes were employment, work ability, and cost-benefit. Qualitative studies of employment facilitators and barriers were also included. The population comprised people with physical disability, visual impairment, hearing impairment, cognitive disability, or mental disability, aged 18-68 years. CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medic, OTseeker, PEDro, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1990 to November 2012. Results Three quantitative (one randomized controlled, one concurrently controlled, and one cohort) and eight qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. There was moderate evidence that specific types of WA (vocational counselling and guidance, education and self-advocacy, help of others, changes in work schedules, work organization, and special transportation) promote employment among physically disabled persons and reduce costs. There was low evidence that WA (liaison, education, work aids, and work techniques) coordinated by case managers increases return to work and is cost-effective when compared with the usual care of persons with physical and cognitive disabilities. The key facilitators and barriers of employment were self-advocacy, support of the employer and community, amount of training and counselling, and flexibility of work schedules and work organization. Conclusions More high-quality studies using validated measures of the work ability and functioning of disabled persons are needed. The identified barriers and facilitators found in the qualitative studies should be used to develop quantitative study designs.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::disability,out::title,outcome::employment,outcome::rtw,review::systematic,snowball\_source,TODO::review},
|
||||
note = {systematic review looking at effectiveness of workplace accommodation (vocational counselling/guidance, education/self-advocacy, help of others, changes in work schedules, work organization, special transportation) on employment, work ability, cost-benefit, rtw (n=11)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- moderate evidence that employment among physically disabled persons promoted by: vocational counselling/guidance, education/self-advocacy, help of others, changes in work schedules, work organisation, special transportation
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- low evidence that rtw increased for physical/cognitive disabilities by: liaison (btw employer and other professionals), education, work aids, work techniques
|
||||
\par
|
||||
barrier/facilitators: self-advocacy, support of employer and community, amount of training/counselling, flexibility of work schedules/organisation},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/V3KT5P2Z/Nevala et al_2015_Workplace Accommodation Among Persons with Disabilities.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Newman2014,
|
||||
title = {Time to Address Gender Discrimination and Inequality in the Health Workforce},
|
||||
author = {Newman, Constance},
|
||||
|
|
@ -10426,7 +10538,7 @@ does NOT look at results of specific policy interventions}
|
|||
usage-count-last-180-days = {2},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {10},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health},
|
||||
keywords = {out::review,review::systematic,TODO::review,type::ubi}
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,out::review,out::title,review::systematic,type::ubi}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Piquero2020,
|
||||
|
|
@ -11202,6 +11314,33 @@ does NOT look at results of specific policy interventions}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,country::US,favorite,inequality::education,inequality::health,inequality::income,out::abstract,region::NA,type::ubi}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Ruhindwa2016,
|
||||
title = {Exploring the Challenges Experienced by People with Disabilities in the Employment Sector in {{Australia}}: {{Advocating}} for Inclusive Practice-a Review of Literature},
|
||||
author = {Ruhindwa, Amos and Randall, Christine and Cartmel, Jennifer},
|
||||
year = {2016},
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF SOCIAL INCLUSION},
|
||||
volume = {7},
|
||||
number = {1},
|
||||
pages = {4--19},
|
||||
issn = {1836-8808},
|
||||
doi = {10.36251/josi.99},
|
||||
abstract = {People with disabilities are generally not considered as able participants in the workforce (paid or volunteer work) and therefore, they often experience exclusion from participating in mainstream employment opportunities. People with disabilities experience various barriers to employment, such as discrimination in the workplace, stigma, prejudice and stereotypes. However, some people with disabilities participate in the workforce and make valuable contributions towards economic development, social capital and wider society. This literature review summarises published research findings about the challenges that people with disabilities experience in pursuing employment opportunities, including volunteering and paid positions; and in undertaking these roles. Furthermore, it explores possible interventions to improve employment outcomes that are effective from the perspectives of people with disabilities. Findings indicate that effective practice takes an inclusive approach and allows clients to take ownership of solutions in relation to addressing the challenges they experience in the employment sector. For this reason, two different community development projects, which particularly focused on employment challenges for people with disabilities, as well as outlining strategies and solutions that promote client ownership were reviewed. Additionally, employment support techniques and strategies, as well as human rights' principles on work and employment for people with disabilities will be debated. Finally, implications for research and practice for the rehabilitation counselling profession and the disability employment services sector are discussed.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::disability,out::title,outcome::employment,outcome::job\_quality,review::narrative,snowball\_source},
|
||||
note = {(narrative) review of barriers to workforce inclusion (paid/volunteer work) for people with disabilities; summary of findings
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- "effective practice takes an inclusive approach and allows clients to take ownership of solutions in relation to addressing the challenges they experience in the employment sector"
|
||||
\par
|
||||
policy recc:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- employment support practices
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- campaigns to encourage disclosing disability},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/4ET6ZSWM/Ruhindwa et al_2016_Exploring the challenges experienced by people with disabilities in the.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Rumrill2013,
|
||||
title = {Employment and Workplace Accommodation Outcomes among Participants in a Vocational Consultation Service for People with Multiple Sclerosis},
|
||||
author = {Rumrill, Phillip D. and Fraser, Robert T. and Johnson, Kurt L.},
|
||||
|
|
@ -12428,6 +12567,32 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
|
|||
keywords = {out::title}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Taukobong2016,
|
||||
title = {Does Addressing Gender Inequalities and Empowering Women and Girls Improve Health and Development Programme Outcomes?},
|
||||
author = {Taukobong, Hannah F. G. and Kincaid, Mary M. and Levy, Jessica K. and Bloom, Shelah S. and Platt, Jennifer L. and Henry, Sarah K. and Darmstadt, Gary L.},
|
||||
year = {2016},
|
||||
month = dec,
|
||||
journal = {HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING},
|
||||
volume = {31},
|
||||
number = {10},
|
||||
pages = {1492--1514},
|
||||
issn = {0268-1080},
|
||||
doi = {10.1093/heapol/czw074},
|
||||
abstract = {This article presents evidence supporting the hypothesis that promoting gender equality and women's and girls' empowerment (GEWE) leads to better health and development outcomes. We reviewed the literature across six sectors-family planning (FP); maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH); nutrition; agriculture; water, sanitation and hygiene; and financial services for the poor-and found 76 studies from low and middle-income countries that met our inclusion criteria. Across these studies, we identified common GEWE variables that emerged repeatedly as significant predictors of sector outcomes. We grouped these variables into 10 thematic categories, which we termed {\textbackslash}textasciigravegender-related levers'. These levers were then classified by the strength of evidence into Wedges, Foundations and Facilitators. Wedges are gender-related levers that had strong associations with improved outcomes across multiple sectors. They include: {\textbackslash}textasciigravecontrol over income/assets/resources', {\textbackslash}textasciigravedecision-making power' and {\textbackslash}textasciigraveeducation'. Elements of these levers overlap, but combined, they encapsulate agency. Increasing female agency promotes equality and broadly improves health and development for women, their families and their communities. The second classification, Foundations, displayed strong, positive associations across FP, MNCH and nutrition. Foundations have a more proximal relationship with sector outcomes and include: {\textbackslash}textasciigraveequitable interpersonal relationships', {\textbackslash}textasciigravemobility' and {\textbackslash}textasciigravepersonal safety'. Finally, the third group of levers, Facilitators, was associated with improved outcomes in two to three sectors and include: {\textbackslash}textasciigraveaccess to information', {\textbackslash}textasciigravecommunity groups', {\textbackslash}textasciigravepaid labour' and {\textbackslash}textasciigraverights'. These levers make it easier for women and girls to achieve their goals and are more traditional elements of development programmes. Overall, gender-related levers were associated with improvements in a variety of health and development outcomes. Furthermore, these associations were cross-sectoral, suggesting that to fully realize the benefits of promoting GEWE, the development community must collaborate in co-ordinated and integrated ways across multiple sectors. More research is needed to identify the mechanisms by which gendered interventions work and under what circumstances.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::gender,out::title,outcome::health,review::narrative,snowball\_source},
|
||||
note = {(narrative?) review of effects of dimensions of female 'empowerment' on health outcomes and development outcomes, such as access to and use of financial services
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- gender inequalities highly contextual (and intersectional), requires identification of variations at start of interventions where inequalities exist, overlap and work as barriers to its implementation
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- strong association with improved outcomes across multiple outcome sectors: control over income/assets/resources, decision-making power, education
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- relation with health/family planning outcomes: mobility, personal safety, equitable interpersonal relationships},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/9WPGW57Z/Taukobong et al_2016_Does addressing gender inequalities and empowering women and girls improve.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Tazerji2022,
|
||||
title = {Global Data Analysis and Risk Factors Associated with Morbidity and Mortality of {{COVID-19}}},
|
||||
author = {Tazerji, Sina Salajegheh and Shahabinejad, Fatemeh and Tokasi, Mahya and Rad, Mohammad Ali and Khan, Muhammad Sajjad and Safdar, Muhammad and Filipiak, Krzysztof J. and Szarpak, Lukasz and Dzieciatkowski, Tomasz and Jurgiel, Jan and Duarte, Phelipe Magalh{\~a}es and Rahman, Md. Tanvir and Sobur, Md. Abdus and Islam, Md. Saiful and Ahmed, Adnan and Shaheen, Mohamed N.F. and Shehata, Awad A. and Gharieb, Rasha and Fawzy, Mohamed and Malik, Yashpal Singh and Jaganathasamy, Nagaraj and Rajendran, Vinodhkumar Obli and Subbaram, Kannan and Ali, P Shaik Syed and Ali, Sheeza and Rehman, Saif Ur and Ozaslan, Mehmet and Khan, Gulfaraz and Saeed, Muhammad and Younas, Umair and Imran, Safdar and Junejo, Yasmeen and Arabkarami, Parmida and Hogan, Unarose and {Rodriguez-Morales}, Alfonso J.},
|
||||
|
|
@ -12669,6 +12834,37 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
|
|||
keywords = {cite::channels,country::Bangladesh,inequality::gender,out::abstract,region::AP}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Ugur2017,
|
||||
title = {Technology {{Adoption}} and {{Employment}} in {{Less Developed Countries}}: {{A Mixed-Method Systematic Review}}},
|
||||
author = {Ugur, Mehmet and Mitra, Arup},
|
||||
year = {2017},
|
||||
month = aug,
|
||||
journal = {WORLD DEVELOPMENT},
|
||||
volume = {96},
|
||||
pages = {1--18},
|
||||
issn = {0305-750X},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.015},
|
||||
abstract = {The implications of technology adoption for productivity, income, and welfare have been studied widely in the context of less developed countries (LDCs). In contrast, the relationship between technology adoption and employment has attracted less interest. This systematic review evaluates the diverse yet sizeable evidence base that has remained below the radars of both reviewers and policy makers. We map the qualitative and empirical evidence and report that the effect of technology adoption on employment is skill biased and more likely to be observed when technology adoption favors product innovation as opposed to process innovation. Technology adoption is also less likely to be associated with employment creation when: (i) the evidence is related to farm employment as opposed to firm/industry employment; (ii) the evidence is related to low-income countries as opposed to lower middle-income or mixed countries; and (iii) the evidence is based on post-2001 data as opposed to pre-2001 data. There is also qualitative evidence indicating that international trade, weak forward and backward linkages, and weaknesses in governance and labor-market institutions tend to weaken the job creating effects of technology adoption. We conclude by calling for compilation of better quality survey data and further attention to sources of heterogeneity in modeling the relationship between technology adoption and employment in LDCs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
keywords = {cited::previous\_reviews,inequality::income,intervention::technology\_adoption,out::title,outcome::employment,review::systematic,snowball\_source},
|
||||
note = {systematic review of effects of technology adoption on employment (in LMIC/LIC 'less developed countries')
|
||||
\par
|
||||
main findings: positive effect more likely when technology adoption favours product innovation not process innovation and when it is is skill based
|
||||
\par
|
||||
additional:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- techn. adoption *less* likely to create employment when: related to farm employment not firm/industry employment; related to low-income countries not LMICs; related to data from after 2001 instead of pre-2001
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- intl trade, weak forward/backward linkages, weaknesses in governance \& labor market institutions can weak job-creating effects of technology adoption
|
||||
\par
|
||||
inequality:
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- existing income inequalities makes effect of technology adoption on employment creation more ambiguous (potentially widening rift of demand for skilled versus unskilled labour)
|
||||
\par
|
||||
- green revolution technologies tend to reduce income/wealth inequality; also negative effect on on-farm employment},
|
||||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/P6MZJ39B/Ugur_Mitra_2017_Technology Adoption and Employment in Less Developed Countries.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{Ullah2020,
|
||||
title = {Potential {{Effects}} of the {{COVID-19 Pandemic}} on {{Future Birth Rate}}},
|
||||
author = {Ullah, Md. Asad and Moin, Abu Tayab and Araf, Yusha and Bhuiyan, Atiqur Rahman and Griffiths, Mark D. and Gozal, David},
|
||||
|
|
@ -23628,31 +23824,6 @@ does NOT look at specific policy intervention}
|
|||
file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/TK8A9635/Jijelava_Vanclay_2014_Social licence to operate through a gender lens.pdf}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000354718500019,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {Workplace Accommodation among Persons with Disabilities: {{A}} Systematic Review of Its Effectiveness and Barriers or Facilitators},
|
||||
author = {Nevala, Nina and Pehkonen, Irmeli and Koskela, Inka and Ruusuvuori, Johanna and Anttila, Heidi},
|
||||
year = {2015},
|
||||
month = jun,
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION},
|
||||
volume = {25},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {432--448},
|
||||
doi = {10.1007/s10926-014-9548-z},
|
||||
abstract = {Purpose A systematic review was conducted to review the effectiveness of workplace accommodation (WA) regarding employment, work ability, and cost-benefit among disabled people. It also describes the evidence gained on the barriers and facilitators of WA process to sustain employment. Methods We reviewed systematically current scientific evidence about effectiveness of WA among disabled persons. The outcomes were employment, work ability, and cost-benefit. Qualitative studies of employment facilitators and barriers were also included. The population comprised people with physical disability, visual impairment, hearing impairment, cognitive disability, or mental disability, aged 18-68 years. CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Medic, OTseeker, PEDro, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for peer-reviewed articles published in English from January 1990 to November 2012. Results Three quantitative (one randomized controlled, one concurrently controlled, and one cohort) and eight qualitative studies met the inclusion criteria. There was moderate evidence that specific types of WA (vocational counselling and guidance, education and self-advocacy, help of others, changes in work schedules, work organization, and special transportation) promote employment among physically disabled persons and reduce costs. There was low evidence that WA (liaison, education, work aids, and work techniques) coordinated by case managers increases return to work and is cost-effective when compared with the usual care of persons with physical and cognitive disabilities. The key facilitators and barriers of employment were self-advocacy, support of the employer and community, amount of training and counselling, and flexibility of work schedules and work organization. Conclusions More high-quality studies using validated measures of the work ability and functioning of disabled persons are needed. The identified barriers and facilitators found in the qualitative studies should be used to develop quantitative study designs.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Nevala, N (Corresponding Author), Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Topeliuksenkatu 41 A, Helsinki 00250, Finland. Nevala, Nina; Pehkonen, Irmeli; Koskela, Inka, Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Helsinki 00250, Finland. Nevala, Nina, Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Hlth Sci, Gerontol Res Ctr, Jyvaskyla 40014, Finland. Ruusuvuori, Johanna, Univ Tampere, Sch Social Sci \& Humanities, Tampere 33014, Finland. Anttila, Heidi, Natl Inst Hlth \& Welf, Helsinki 00271, Finland.},
|
||||
author-email = {nina.nevala@ttl.fi},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Rehabilitation; Social Issues},
|
||||
times-cited = {79},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000354718500019},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {2},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {93},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Rehabilitation; Social Issues},
|
||||
keywords = {inequality::disability,out::title,review::systematic,TODO::review}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000354723600015,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {Ageing Workers with Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries},
|
||||
|
|
@ -25777,29 +25948,6 @@ no PI}
|
|||
web-of-science-categories = {Sociology; Women's Studies}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000380850800002,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {Exploring the Challenges Experienced by People with Disabilities in the Employment Sector in {{Australia}}: {{Advocating}} for Inclusive Practice-a Review of Literature},
|
||||
author = {Ruhindwa, Amos and Randall, Christine and Cartmel, Jennifer},
|
||||
year = {2016},
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF SOCIAL INCLUSION},
|
||||
volume = {7},
|
||||
number = {1},
|
||||
pages = {4--19},
|
||||
doi = {10.36251/josi.99},
|
||||
abstract = {People with disabilities are generally not considered as able participants in the workforce (paid or volunteer work) and therefore, they often experience exclusion from participating in mainstream employment opportunities. People with disabilities experience various barriers to employment, such as discrimination in the workplace, stigma, prejudice and stereotypes. However, some people with disabilities participate in the workforce and make valuable contributions towards economic development, social capital and wider society. This literature review summarises published research findings about the challenges that people with disabilities experience in pursuing employment opportunities, including volunteering and paid positions; and in undertaking these roles. Furthermore, it explores possible interventions to improve employment outcomes that are effective from the perspectives of people with disabilities. Findings indicate that effective practice takes an inclusive approach and allows clients to take ownership of solutions in relation to addressing the challenges they experience in the employment sector. For this reason, two different community development projects, which particularly focused on employment challenges for people with disabilities, as well as outlining strategies and solutions that promote client ownership were reviewed. Additionally, employment support techniques and strategies, as well as human rights' principles on work and employment for people with disabilities will be debated. Finally, implications for research and practice for the rehabilitation counselling profession and the disability employment services sector are discussed.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Ruhindwa, A (Corresponding Author), Griffith Univ, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia. Ruhindwa, Amos; Randall, Christine; Cartmel, Jennifer, Griffith Univ, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia.},
|
||||
author-email = {amos.ruhindwa@griffithuni.edu.au},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Social Issues},
|
||||
times-cited = {8},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000380850800002},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {0},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {21},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Social Issues}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000382344800002,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {``{{I}} Am like a Deaf, Dumb and Blind Person'': {{Mobility}} and Immobility of {{Chinese}} (Im)Migrants in {{Flushing}}, {{Queens}}, {{New York City}}},
|
||||
|
|
@ -26332,30 +26480,6 @@ no PI}
|
|||
web-of-science-categories = {Economics; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000390207100016,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {Does Addressing Gender Inequalities and Empowering Women and Girls Improve Health and Development Programme Outcomes?},
|
||||
author = {Taukobong, Hannah F. G. and Kincaid, Mary M. and Levy, Jessica K. and Bloom, Shelah S. and Platt, Jennifer L. and Henry, Sarah K. and Darmstadt, Gary L.},
|
||||
year = {2016},
|
||||
month = dec,
|
||||
journal = {HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING},
|
||||
volume = {31},
|
||||
number = {10},
|
||||
pages = {1492--1514},
|
||||
doi = {10.1093/heapol/czw074},
|
||||
abstract = {This article presents evidence supporting the hypothesis that promoting gender equality and women's and girls' empowerment (GEWE) leads to better health and development outcomes. We reviewed the literature across six sectors-family planning (FP); maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH); nutrition; agriculture; water, sanitation and hygiene; and financial services for the poor-and found 76 studies from low and middle-income countries that met our inclusion criteria. Across these studies, we identified common GEWE variables that emerged repeatedly as significant predictors of sector outcomes. We grouped these variables into 10 thematic categories, which we termed `gender-related levers'. These levers were then classified by the strength of evidence into Wedges, Foundations and Facilitators. Wedges are gender-related levers that had strong associations with improved outcomes across multiple sectors. They include: `control over income/assets/resources', `decision-making power' and `education'. Elements of these levers overlap, but combined, they encapsulate agency. Increasing female agency promotes equality and broadly improves health and development for women, their families and their communities. The second classification, Foundations, displayed strong, positive associations across FP, MNCH and nutrition. Foundations have a more proximal relationship with sector outcomes and include: `equitable interpersonal relationships', `mobility' and `personal safety'. Finally, the third group of levers, Facilitators, was associated with improved outcomes in two to three sectors and include: `access to information', `community groups', `paid labour' and `rights'. These levers make it easier for women and girls to achieve their goals and are more traditional elements of development programmes. Overall, gender-related levers were associated with improvements in a variety of health and development outcomes. Furthermore, these associations were cross-sectoral, suggesting that to fully realize the benefits of promoting GEWE, the development community must collaborate in co-ordinated and integrated ways across multiple sectors. More research is needed to identify the mechanisms by which gendered interventions work and under what circumstances.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Levy, JK (Corresponding Author), WUSTL, Campus Box 1196,1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63140 USA. Taukobong, Hannah F. G.; Kincaid, Mary M.; Levy, Jessica K.; Bloom, Shelah S., Iris Grp, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA. Levy, Jessica K., Washington Univ, George Warren Brown Sch Social Work, St Louis, MO 63105 USA. Bloom, Shelah S., Univ N Carolina, Dept Maternal \& Child Hlth, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA. Platt, Jennifer L., Thrive 4-7, Morrisville, NC 27560 USA. Henry, Sarah K.; Darmstadt, Gary L., Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.},
|
||||
author-email = {JLevy@irisgroupinternational.com},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Health Care Sciences \& Services},
|
||||
times-cited = {63},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000390207100016},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {2},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {55},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Health Care Sciences \& Services; Health Policy \& Services}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@inproceedings{WOS:000390308100044,
|
||||
type = {Proceedings Paper},
|
||||
title = {Ensuring Universal Access to Eye Health in Urban Slums in the Global South: {{The}} Case of Bhopal (India)},
|
||||
|
|
@ -27639,28 +27763,6 @@ no PI}
|
|||
web-of-science-categories = {Sociology}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000402342600001,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {Technology Adoption and Employment in Less Developed Countries: {{A}} Mixed-Method Systematic Review},
|
||||
author = {Ugur, Mehmet and Mitra, Arup},
|
||||
year = {2017},
|
||||
month = aug,
|
||||
journal = {WORLD DEVELOPMENT},
|
||||
volume = {96},
|
||||
pages = {1--18},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.015},
|
||||
abstract = {The implications of technology adoption for productivity, income, and welfare have been studied widely in the context of less developed countries (LDCs). In contrast, the relationship between technology adoption and employment has attracted less interest. This systematic review evaluates the diverse yet sizeable evidence base that has remained below the radars of both reviewers and policy makers. We map the qualitative and empirical evidence and report that the effect of technology adoption on employment is skill biased and more likely to be observed when technology adoption favors product innovation as opposed to process innovation. Technology adoption is also less likely to be associated with employment creation when: (i) the evidence is related to farm employment as opposed to firm/industry employment; (ii) the evidence is related to low-income countries as opposed to lower middle-income or mixed countries; and (iii) the evidence is based on post-2001 data as opposed to pre-2001 data. There is also qualitative evidence indicating that international trade, weak forward and backward linkages, and weaknesses in governance and labor-market institutions tend to weaken the job creating effects of technology adoption. We conclude by calling for compilation of better quality survey data and further attention to sources of heterogeneity in modeling the relationship between technology adoption and employment in LDCs. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Ugur, M (Corresponding Author), Univ Greenwich, Business Sch, London, England. Ugur, Mehmet, Univ Greenwich, Business Sch, London, England. Mitra, Arup, Inst Econ Growth, Delhi, India.},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Development Studies; Business \& Economics},
|
||||
times-cited = {12},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000402342600001},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {5},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {72},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@incollection{WOS:000402721800007,
|
||||
type = {Article; Book Chapter},
|
||||
title = {{{EMERGING GENDER PARITY AND PERSISTENT DIFFERENCES}}: {{CULTURAL SHIFTS AMONG FACULTY COHORTS AT A PRIMARILY UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION}}},
|
||||
|
|
@ -29778,30 +29880,6 @@ does NOT look at specific policy intervention, nor effects of/on inequality itse
|
|||
note = {2nd Advanced Research on Business, Management and Humanities (ARBUHUM), Phuket, THAILAND, OCT 10-12, 2017}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000432673200003,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {Economic Growth, Disparity, and Determinants of Female Labor Force Participation: {{A}} Research Agenda},
|
||||
author = {Kumari, Reena},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
journal = {WORLD JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT},
|
||||
volume = {14},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {138--152},
|
||||
doi = {10.1108/WJEMSD-03-2017-0009},
|
||||
abstract = {Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the themes of relationship between female labor force participation (FLFP) and economic growth, gender disparity in work participation; and to identify the factors which determine females to participate in labor market. The paper uses a framework incorporating a U-shaped relationship between FLFP and economic growth, gender wise wage disparity and economic, social, cultural and other factors which affects FLFP. Design/methodology/approach Thematically, the selected literature falls into three main categories: the relationship between FLFP and economic growth; disparity in work participation in terms of male and female wages; and drivers or determinants of FLFP which have been described using international documents and experiences of the different countries. The review closes by identifying gaps in the existing research base and by suggesting areas for inquiry that have been untouched and warrant further research. Findings The key findings emerging from this examination of literature show that the FLFP rate exhibits a U-shaped during the process of economic development. Also, there are evidences of gender pay disparity across the sectors which have been justified by documenting a large number of existing literatures. Demographic factors (including fertility, migration, marriages and child care), economic factors (including unemployment, per capita income, non-farm job and infrastructure) and other explanatory variables which include the regulatory context encompassing family and childcare policies, tax regimes, and presence of subsidized health-care for workers determine the FLFP. Practical implications This paper suggests that in order to bring equality in gender pay gap, there is a requirement of replacing the traditional value system. There is need to provide an environment in which women are encouraged and supported in their efforts, in which women have equitable access to resources and opportunities. Social implications This paper addresses the impact of education, culture and child care subsidies on female labor participation. They positively impact FLFP and such a link has not been sufficiently addressed in prior literature. Originality/value In contrast to previous studies which document a broad-based picture of female work participation, this type of research deals with the link between economic growth and female labor participation, gender wage disparity and determinants of it which has been largely unexplored so far.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Kumari, R (Corresponding Author), GLA Univ, Inst Business Management, Mathura, India. Kumari, R (Corresponding Author), ICRIER, Dept Econ, New Delhi, India. Kumari, Reena, GLA Univ, Inst Business Management, Mathura, India. Kumari, Reena, ICRIER, Dept Econ, New Delhi, India.},
|
||||
author-email = {reena.kumari@gla.ac.in},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Business \& Economics},
|
||||
times-cited = {7},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000432673200003},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {0},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {35},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Management},
|
||||
keywords = {inequality::gender,inequality::income,out::abstract,review::narrative,TODO::review}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000432845100001,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {Health Inequalities between Employed and Unemployed in Northern {{Sweden}}: A Decomposition Analysis of Social Determinants for Mental Health},
|
||||
|
|
@ -29874,31 +29952,6 @@ does NOT look at specific policy intervention, nor effects of/on inequality itse
|
|||
web-of-science-categories = {Economics}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000433032900003,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {A Systematic Review of the Role of Gender in Securing and Maintaining Employment among Youth and Young Adults with Disabilities},
|
||||
author = {Lindsay, Sally and Cagliostro, Elaine and Albarico, Mikhaela and Srikanthan, Dilakshan and Mortaji, Neda},
|
||||
year = {2018},
|
||||
month = jun,
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION},
|
||||
volume = {28},
|
||||
number = {2},
|
||||
pages = {232--251},
|
||||
doi = {10.1007/s10926-017-9726-x},
|
||||
abstract = {Purpose There is a critical need for gender-specific vocational supports for young adults with disabilities as they transition to employment. We conducted a systematic review to explore the role of gender in securing and maintaining employment. Methods Systematic searches of seven databases identified 48 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Using a narrative synthesis approach, these studies were analyzed in terms of the characteristics of the participants, methodology, results, and quality of the evidence. Results Among the 48 studies, 112,473 participants (56\% male), mean age (of the total sample) was 21, represented across ten countries. Twenty-one studies reported that young men with disabilities had better employment outcomes than women with disabilities. Eight studies showed that females with disabilities had better employment outcomes than males. Five studies reported that there were no gender differences in employment outcomes for youth with various disabilities. With regards to maintaining employment, men with disabilities often work more hours and have better wages compared to women with disabilities. There are several gender-related barriers and facilitators to maintaining employment including social supports and gender role expectations. Conclusions Our findings highlight that there is a critical need for gender-specific vocational supports for young adults with disabilities.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Lindsay, S (Corresponding Author), Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Bloorview Res Inst, 150 Kilgour Rd, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada. Lindsay, S (Corresponding Author), Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci \& Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada. Lindsay, Sally; Cagliostro, Elaine; Albarico, Mikhaela; Srikanthan, Dilakshan; Mortaji, Neda, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Bloorview Res Inst, 150 Kilgour Rd, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada. Lindsay, Sally, Univ Toronto, Dept Occupat Sci \& Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada.},
|
||||
author-email = {slindsay@hollandbloorview.ca},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Rehabilitation; Social Issues},
|
||||
times-cited = {22},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000433032900003},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {2},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {19},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Rehabilitation; Social Issues},
|
||||
keywords = {inequality::disability,inequality::gender,integrated,out::title,review::systematic}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000433304500001,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {A Step toward Timely Referral and Early Diagnosis of Cancer: {{Implementation}} and Impact on Knowledge of a Primary Care-Based Training Program in Botswana},
|
||||
|
|
@ -39981,31 +40034,6 @@ does NOT directly look at LM adjacency markers (but education outcomes)},
|
|||
keywords = {out::title}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000643731600002,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {Women's Reproductive Health and Economic Activity: {{A}} Narrative Review},
|
||||
author = {Finlay, Jocelyn E.},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
month = mar,
|
||||
journal = {WORLD DEVELOPMENT},
|
||||
volume = {139},
|
||||
number = {105313},
|
||||
doi = {10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105313},
|
||||
abstract = {This paper provides a narrative review of the literature that addresses the connection between women's reproductive health and women's economic activity. Women's reproductive health, gender equality and decent work, are all part of the Sustainable Development Goals and this review highlights how these Goals are interconnected. The review focuses on the relationship between fertility and women's work and provides a detailed discussion of the academic literature that identifies the causal effect of fertility on changes in female labor force participation. Fertility is captured by timing, spacing and number of chil-dren, and career advancement, job quality, and hours worked are addressed on the work side. The review contrasts the fertility-work nexus for low-, middle-and high-income countries separately, recognizing national income per capita as a moderator of the effect of fertility on female labor force participation. In low-income countries, where labor force participation is for the most part in the informal sector, women must adopt their own strategies for balancing child rearing and labor force participation, such as selection of job type, relying on other women in the household for childcare, and birth spacing to limit infants in their care. In middle-income countries, women juggle child rearing and labor force participation with the overarching issue of income inequality, and early childbearing and lone motherhood perpetuate poverty. For women in high-income countries, social protection policies can assist women in managing the balance of childrearing and work, but these policies do not address underlying issues of gender inequality. Despite these policies, career advancement is interrupted by childbearing. As the relationship between fertility and women's work varies by income per capita across countries, polices that support women in achieving balance in their desired family size and accessing decent work varies across countries. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Finlay, JE (Corresponding Author), Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth \& Populat, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA. Finlay, Jocelyn E., Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth \& Populat, 665 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA.},
|
||||
author-email = {jfinlay@hsph.harvard.edu},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
earlyaccessdate = {JAN 2021},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Development Studies; Business \& Economics},
|
||||
times-cited = {9},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000643731600002},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {6},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {41},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics},
|
||||
keywords = {inequality::gender,inequality::health,integrated,out::title,review::narrative}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000643731700004,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {Incomplete Transitions to Clean Household Energy Reinforce Gender Inequality by Lowering Women's Respiratory Health and Household Labour Productivity},
|
||||
|
|
@ -41544,32 +41572,6 @@ does NOT directly look at LM adjacency markers (but education outcomes)},
|
|||
keywords = {cite::further\_reading,method::qualitative,out::abstract}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000687090100001,
|
||||
type = {Review},
|
||||
title = {Women's and Employers' Experiences and Views of Combining Breastfeeding with a Return to Paid Employment: {{A}} Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies},
|
||||
author = {Chang, Yan-Shing and Harger, Laura and Beake, Sarah and Bick, Debra},
|
||||
year = {2021},
|
||||
month = sep,
|
||||
journal = {JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY \& WOMENS HEALTH},
|
||||
volume = {66},
|
||||
number = {5},
|
||||
pages = {641--655},
|
||||
doi = {10.1111/jmwh.13243},
|
||||
abstract = {Introduction Returning to paid employment is one of the reasons women stop breastfeeding earlier than they planned to. This systematic review aimed to provide insight into the experiences and views of women and employers on breastfeeding and returning to paid employment, with findings used to inform practice and policy. Methods The review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published in English. JBI's meta-aggregative approach informed data analysis. The studies in this analysis included women who stopped breastfeeding before, and those who continued breastfeeding after, returning to paid employment and the employers, work managers, or supervisors of women who continued breastfeeding after returning to paid employment. Results Twenty-six articles presenting findings from 25 studies were included and critically appraised. Synthesized findings showed that women experienced physical and emotional difficulties and described gender and employment inequalities in accessing and receiving the support they needed. Women reported that the importance of their own motivation and having workplace legislation in place facilitated breastfeeding during employment. Support from employers, colleagues, and family members, as well as access to convenient child care, helped women continue breastfeeding on return to paid employment. Employers' personal experiences influenced their views on breastfeeding and working, and the need for more education and communication between employers and employers on breastfeeding in the workplace was recognized. Discussion Support from family, work colleagues, and employers was important to reduce the physical and emotional challenges women experienced when combing breastfeeding with return to paid employment. Gender inequalities, especially in low- and middle-income countries, in accessing support exacerbated the difficulties women experienced. Limited data were identified regarding employers' experiences and views, suggesting an urgent need for further research to explore employers' and work colleagues' experiences and views.},
|
||||
affiliation = {Chang, YS (Corresponding Author), Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing Midwifery \& Pall, London, England. Chang, Yan-Shing; Harger, Laura; Beake, Sarah, Kings Coll London, Florence Nightingale Fac Nursing Midwifery \& Pall, London, England. Harger, Laura, Lewisham \& Greenwich NHS Trust, London, England. Bick, Debra, Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Warwick Clin Trials Unit, Warwick, England.},
|
||||
author-email = {yan-shing.chang@kcl.ac.uk},
|
||||
da = {2023-11-02},
|
||||
earlyaccessdate = {AUG 2021},
|
||||
langid = {english},
|
||||
research-areas = {Nursing},
|
||||
times-cited = {3},
|
||||
unique-id = {WOS:000687090100001},
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days = {4},
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013 = {20},
|
||||
web-of-science-categories = {Nursing},
|
||||
keywords = {method::qualitative,out::title,review::systematic,TODO::review}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@article{WOS:000687298700001,
|
||||
type = {Article},
|
||||
title = {Global Trends in Intra-Household Gender Inequality},
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue