feat(data): Extract Adam2018

02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
   usage-count-last-180-days = {3},
   usage-count-since-2013 = {27},
   web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics},
-  keywords = {country::Tanzania,inequality::income,inequality::spatial,region::SSA,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::infrastructure},
+  keywords = {country::Tanzania,done::extracted,inequality::income,inequality::spatial,region::SSA,relevant,type::infrastructure},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/JNB5E7IR/Adam et al_2018_Rural-urban linkages, public investment and transport costs.pdf}
 }
 

02-data/processed/relevant/Adam2018.yml

@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+author:  Adam, C., Bevan, D., & Gollin, D.
+year: 2018
+title: "Rural-urban linkages, public investment and transport costs: The case of tanzania"
+publisher: World Development
+uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.08.013
+discipline: development
+
+country: Tanzania
+period: 2001
+maxlength:
+targeting: explicit
+group: rural workers
+data: national Tanzania Social Accounting Matrix (SAM, 2001); national administrative survey Integrated Labor Force Survey (2001), Tanzania Agricultural Sample Census (2003)
+
+design: quasi-experimental
+method: general equilibrium model
+sample: 7
+unit: household
+representativeness: subnational, rural
+causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
+
+theory: transport cost burden approach
+limitations: can not account for population change (e.g. pop growth); causality based on model only
+observation:
+  - intervention: infrastructure
+    institutional: 0
+    structural: 1
+    agency: 0
+    inequality: spatial; income
+    type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
+    indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
+    measures: income; consumption
+    findings: results depend on financing scheme, each financing scheme entails some households being worse off; rural households worse off when infrastructure is deficit-financed or paid through tariff revenue; rural households benefit most when financed through consumption taxes or by external aid
+    channels: movement of rural workers out of quasi-subsistence agriculture to other locations and sectors
+    direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
+    significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
+
+notes: there can be spatial differences to how connected regions within a country are to markets purely due to transport costs
+annotation: |
+  A study modeling the effects of transport infrastructure investments in Tanzania on rural income inequalities and household welfare inequalities, modeled through consumption indicators.
+  Generally it finds that the results of public investment measures into transport infrastructure largely depend on the financing scheme used.
+  Comparing four financing schemes when looking at the effects on rural households, it finds that they are generally worse off when the development is deficit-financed or paid through tariff revenues.
+  On the other hand, rural households benefit through increased income from measures financed through consumption taxes, or by external aid.
+  The general finding is that there is no pareto optimum for any of the investment measures for all locations, 
+  and that much of the increases in welfare are based on movement of rural workers out of quasi-subsistence agriculture to other locations and other sectors.
+  The study creates causal inferences but is limited in its modeling approach representing a limited subset of empirical possibility spaces,
+  as well as having to make the assumption of no population growth for measures to hold.

02-data/supplementary/lib.bib

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
   usage-count-last-180-days = {3},
   usage-count-since-2013 = {27},
   web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics},
-  keywords = {country::Tanzania,inequality::income,inequality::spatial,region::SSA,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::infrastructure},
+  keywords = {country::Tanzania,done::extracted,inequality::income,inequality::spatial,region::SSA,relevant,type::infrastructure},
   file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/JNB5E7IR/Adam et al_2018_Rural-urban linkages, public investment and transport costs.pdf}
 }