244 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown
244 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown
|
# Screening tool
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Tracks the categories and possible values of tags (or 'keywords') for the screening process step of scoping.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## TODO
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A work-in-progress tag which simply states the step of the scoping review
|
||
|
|
process the respective source is currently at.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
TODO::QUESTION
|
||
|
|
TODO::SPANISH
|
||
|
|
TODO::abstract
|
||
|
|
TODO::full-text
|
||
|
|
TODO::review
|
||
|
|
TODO::title
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Cite
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Even if a study is not directly relevant for the final extraction pool,
|
||
|
|
it might contain valuable information. These tags give the reason they may
|
||
|
|
prove interesting yet when considering the inequalities analyzed by them.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
cite::channels
|
||
|
|
cite::framework
|
||
|
|
cite::further_reading
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Country
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The main country of interest for the study. Multiple possible for comparative/multiple case studies.
|
||
|
|
Global studies, or ones using dozens of countries will not be tagged.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
country::Argentina
|
||
|
|
country::Armenia
|
||
|
|
country::Australia
|
||
|
|
country::Austria
|
||
|
|
country::Bangladesh
|
||
|
|
country::Belgium
|
||
|
|
country::Bengal
|
||
|
|
country::Bolivia
|
||
|
|
country::Bosnia_Herzegovina
|
||
|
|
country::Botswana
|
||
|
|
country::Brazil
|
||
|
|
country::Britain
|
||
|
|
country::Burundi
|
||
|
|
country::Cambodia
|
||
|
|
country::Cameroon
|
||
|
|
country::Canada
|
||
|
|
country::Chile
|
||
|
|
country::China
|
||
|
|
country::Colombia
|
||
|
|
country::Croatia
|
||
|
|
country::Cyprus
|
||
|
|
country::Czech_Republic
|
||
|
|
country::Denmark
|
||
|
|
country::Ecuador
|
||
|
|
country::Eswatini
|
||
|
|
country::Ethiopia
|
||
|
|
country::Finland
|
||
|
|
country::France
|
||
|
|
country::Germany
|
||
|
|
country::Ghana
|
||
|
|
country::Greece
|
||
|
|
country::Guatemala
|
||
|
|
country::Honduras
|
||
|
|
country::HongKong
|
||
|
|
country::Hungary
|
||
|
|
country::India
|
||
|
|
country::Indonesia
|
||
|
|
country::Iran
|
||
|
|
country::Ireland
|
||
|
|
country::Israel
|
||
|
|
country::Italy
|
||
|
|
country::Japan
|
||
|
|
country::Jordan
|
||
|
|
country::Kazakhstan
|
||
|
|
country::Kenya
|
||
|
|
country::Korea
|
||
|
|
country::Liberia
|
||
|
|
country::Lithuania
|
||
|
|
country::Madagascar
|
||
|
|
country::Malawi
|
||
|
|
country::Malawy
|
||
|
|
country::Malaysia
|
||
|
|
country::Malta
|
||
|
|
country::Mexico
|
||
|
|
country::Mongolia
|
||
|
|
country::Morocco
|
||
|
|
country::Nepal
|
||
|
|
country::Netherlands
|
||
|
|
country::New_Zealand
|
||
|
|
country::Nicaragua
|
||
|
|
country::Nigeria
|
||
|
|
country::Norway
|
||
|
|
country::Pakistan
|
||
|
|
country::Paraguay
|
||
|
|
country::Philippines
|
||
|
|
country::Poland
|
||
|
|
country::Portugal
|
||
|
|
country::Romania
|
||
|
|
country::Russia
|
||
|
|
country::Rwanda
|
||
|
|
country::Saudi_Arabia
|
||
|
|
country::Senegal
|
||
|
|
country::Slovakia
|
||
|
|
country::South_Africa
|
||
|
|
country::Spain
|
||
|
|
country::Sri_Lanka
|
||
|
|
country::Sweden
|
||
|
|
country::Switzerland
|
||
|
|
country::Taiwan
|
||
|
|
country::Tanzania
|
||
|
|
country::Thailand
|
||
|
|
country::Timor-Leste
|
||
|
|
country::Turkey
|
||
|
|
country::US
|
||
|
|
country::Ukraine
|
||
|
|
country::Uruguay
|
||
|
|
country::Vietnam
|
||
|
|
country::West_Bank
|
||
|
|
country::Zambia
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Inequality
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The type of inequality illuminated by a study.
|
||
|
|
Will often be multiple, a strong sign for a study's intersectional approach.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
inequality::age
|
||
|
|
inequality::consumption
|
||
|
|
inequality::disability
|
||
|
|
inequality::education
|
||
|
|
inequality::ethnicity
|
||
|
|
inequality::gender
|
||
|
|
inequality::generational
|
||
|
|
inequality::health
|
||
|
|
inequality::income
|
||
|
|
inequality::income
|
||
|
|
inequality::language
|
||
|
|
inequality::lgbt
|
||
|
|
inequality::migration
|
||
|
|
inequality::poverty
|
||
|
|
inequality::racial
|
||
|
|
inequality::socio-demographic
|
||
|
|
inequality::spatial
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Issue
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If there is an issue with a study which may impede further
|
||
|
|
progress, or any progress at all - even if it may not be sorted
|
||
|
|
out from relevance yet, or if it has.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
issue::age
|
||
|
|
issue::language
|
||
|
|
issue::no-access
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Method
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If one method is clearly marked as primary, or surprisingly is not
|
||
|
|
the primary method within title and or abstract, it will be noted
|
||
|
|
here.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
method::qualitative
|
||
|
|
method::quantitative
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Out
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The reason, or step of the screening process for the study falling
|
||
|
|
out of relevance. Will be used later to generate accurate numbers
|
||
|
|
per screening step.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
out::abstract
|
||
|
|
out::full-text
|
||
|
|
out::language
|
||
|
|
out::review
|
||
|
|
out::title
|
||
|
|
out::year
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Region
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The general world region a study is working in.
|
||
|
|
May align to the individual country (or countries) it is analyzing,
|
||
|
|
but may also stand on its own.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
region::AP
|
||
|
|
region::EU
|
||
|
|
region::LAC
|
||
|
|
region::MENA
|
||
|
|
region::NA
|
||
|
|
region::SSA
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Review
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
If a study is a review, it will be captured under one of these tags.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
review::?
|
||
|
|
review::critical
|
||
|
|
review::integrative
|
||
|
|
review::meta
|
||
|
|
review::narrative
|
||
|
|
review::scoping
|
||
|
|
review::systematic
|
||
|
|
review::umbrella
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Type
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The primary type of intervention, circumstance or shock the study is interested in.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
type::automation
|
||
|
|
type::cash_transfer
|
||
|
|
type::child_labor
|
||
|
|
type::collective_action
|
||
|
|
type::cooperative_entrepreneurship
|
||
|
|
type::counseling
|
||
|
|
type::csr
|
||
|
|
type::electrification
|
||
|
|
type::experimental
|
||
|
|
type::infrastructure
|
||
|
|
type::institutional
|
||
|
|
type::marketization
|
||
|
|
type::maternity_benefit
|
||
|
|
type::microcredit
|
||
|
|
type::minimum_wage
|
||
|
|
type::pension
|
||
|
|
type::regulation
|
||
|
|
type::rtw
|
||
|
|
type::structural
|
||
|
|
type::subsidy
|
||
|
|
type::taxation
|
||
|
|
type::trade_liberalization
|
||
|
|
type::training
|
||
|
|
type::ubi
|
||
|
|
type::universal_licensing
|
||
|
|
type::volunteering
|
||
|
|
type::welfare
|
||
|
|
type::work_programme
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Misc
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
⚠️ Invalid DOI
|
||
|
|
⛔ No DOI found
|
||
|
|
favorite
|
||
|
|
relevant
|
||
|
|
integrated
|
||
|
|
intersectional
|