47 lines
2.1 KiB
YAML
47 lines
2.1 KiB
YAML
|
author: Dieckhoff, M., Gash, V., & Steiber, N.
|
||
|
year: 2015
|
||
|
title: "Measuring the effect of institutional change on gender inequality in the labour market"
|
||
|
publisher: Research in Social Stratification and Mobility
|
||
|
uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2014.12.001
|
||
|
pubtype: article
|
||
|
discipline: sociology
|
||
|
|
||
|
country: global
|
||
|
period:
|
||
|
maxlength:
|
||
|
targeting:
|
||
|
group:
|
||
|
data:
|
||
|
|
||
|
design:
|
||
|
method:
|
||
|
sample:
|
||
|
unit:
|
||
|
representativeness:
|
||
|
causal: # 0 correlation / 1 causal
|
||
|
|
||
|
theory:
|
||
|
limitations: averaged across national contexts may obscure specific insights
|
||
|
observation:
|
||
|
- intervention: collective action (unionization)
|
||
|
institutional: 0
|
||
|
structural: 1
|
||
|
agency: 0
|
||
|
inequality: gender
|
||
|
type: # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
|
||
|
indicator: # 0 absolute / 1 relative
|
||
|
measures: employment
|
||
|
findings: men and women increased standard employment contracts with increased unionization; female employment does not decrease
|
||
|
channels: increased standard employment contract probability
|
||
|
direction: 1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos
|
||
|
significance: 2 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
|
||
|
|
||
|
notes: MISSING EXTRACTION OF DEREGULATION OF TEMPORARY CONTRACTS; FAMILY POLICIES
|
||
|
annotation: |
|
||
|
A study on the effect of trade unionization in European labour markets, with a specific emphasis on its effects on gender inequalities.
|
||
|
It finds, first of all, that increased unionization is related to the probability of being employed on a standard employment contract for both men and women.
|
||
|
It also finds no evidence that men seem to carry increased benefits from increased unionization, although in combination with temporary contract and family policy re-regulations, men do seem to experience greater benefits than women.
|
||
|
At the same time women's employment under standard contracts does not decrease, such that there is no absolute detrimental effect for either gender.
|
||
|
It does, however, pose the question of the allocation of relative benefits between the genders through unionization efforts.
|
||
|
The study is limited in that, by averaging outcomes across European nations, it can not account for nation-specific labour market contexts or gender disaggregations.
|