professional/wow-inequalities
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
wow-inequalities/02-data/raw/02_snowballing-starts/Heymann2019/references.txt

83 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

feat(data): Add snowballing reference preparations From these, with the help of crossref et al, we can fairly easily start the snowballing process.
2024-01-09 17:14:31 +00:00
1. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
2. Benach J, Muntaner C, Santana V, for the Employment Conditions Knowledge Network. Employment conditions and health inequalities. Final report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2007. http://www.who.int/social_ determinants/resources/articles/emconet_who_report.pdf (accessed April 23, 2018).
3. Sen G, Östlin P, George A, for the Women and Gender Equity Knowledge Network. Unequal, unfair, ineffective and inefficient gender inequity in health: why it exists and how we can change it. Final report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health. 2007. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/resources/ csdh_media/wgekn_final_report_07.pdf (accessed April 23, 2018).
4. UNESCO. Global education monitoring report gender review 2018: meeting our commitments to gender equality in education. Paris: UNESCO, 2018. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002615/ 261593e.pdf (accessed July 31, 2018).
5. ILO. World employment social outlook: trends for women 2018— global snapshot. Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2018. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/--publ/documents/publication/wcms_619577.pdf (accessed July 31, 2018).
6. World Economic Forum. The global gender gap report 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2017. http://www3.weforum.org/ docs/WEF_GGGR_2017.pdf (accessed July 19, 2018).
7. UN Women. Turning promises into action: gender equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: UN Women, 2018. http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/ headquarters/attachments/sections/library/publications/2018/ sdg-report-gender-equality-in-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainabledevelopment-2018-en.pdf?la=en&vs=5653 (accessed July 31, 2018).
8. Klugman J, Hanmer L, Twigg S, Hasan T, McCleary-Sills J, Santamaria J. Voice and agency: empowering women and girls for shared prosperity. Washington, DC: World Bank Group, 2014. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/19036 (accessed July 31, 2018).
9. Thomas D. The distribution of income and expenditure within the household. Ann Econ Stat 1993; 29: 109–35.
10. Quisumbing AR, Maluccio JA. Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 2003; 65: 283–327.
11. Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, et al. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet 2019; published online May 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(19)30652-X.
12. Weber A, Cislaghi B, Meausoone V, et al. Gender norms and health: insights from global survey data. Lancet 2019; published online May 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30765-2.
13. Campos-Serna J, Ronda-Pérez E, Artazcoz L, Moen BE, Benavides FG. Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: a systematic review. Int J Equity Health 2013; 12: 57.
14. Eng A, ’t Mannetje A, McLean D, Ellison-Loschmann L, Cheng S, Pearce N. Gender differences in occupational exposure patterns. Occup Environ Med 2011; 68: 888–94.
15. Stergiou-Kita M, Mansfield E, Colantonio A, Moody J, Mantis S. What’s gender got to do with it? Examining masculinities, health and safety and return to work in male dominated skilled trades. Work 2016; 54: 721–33.
16. Fay H, Baral SD, Trapence G, et al. Stigma, health care access, and HIV knowledge among men who have sex with men in Malawi, Namibia, and Botswana. AIDS Behav 2011; 15: 1088–97.
17. Sandfort T, Frazer MS, Matebeni Z, Reddy V, Southey-Swartz I. Histories of forced sex and health outcomes among southern African lesbian and bisexual women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health 2015; 15: 22.
18. Yu C, Zuo X, Blum RW, et al. Marching to a difefrent drummer: a cross-cultural comparison of young adolescents who challenge gender norms. J Adolesc Health 2017; 61: S48–54.
19. Zaikman Y, Marks MJ, Young TM, Zeiber JA. Gender role violations and the sexual double standard. J Homosex 2016; 63: 1608–29.
20. Hay K, McDougal L, Percival V, et al. Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change. Lancet 2019; published online May 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(19)30648-8.
21. Rao Gupta G, Oomman N, Grown C, et al. Gender equality and gender norms: framing the opportunities for health. Lancet 2019; published online May 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(19)30651-8.
22. Interagency Gender Working Group. The Gender Integration Continuum training session user’s guide. Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau, 2017. https://www.igwg.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12/17-418-GenderContTraini ng-2017-12-12-1633_FINAL.pdf (accessed Nov 26, 2018).
23. Muralidharan A, Fehringer J, Pappa S, Rottach E, Das M, Mandal M. Transforming gender norms, roles, and power dynamics for better health: evidence from a systematic review of genderintegrated health programs in low- and middle-income countries. Washington, DC: Futures Group, Health Policy Project, 2015. https://www.healthpolicyproject.com/pubs/381_ GPMIndiaSummaryReport.pdf (accessed June 1, 2018).
24. Rottach E, Schuler SR, Hardee K. Gender perspectives improve reproductive health outcomes: new evidence. Population Reference Bureau, 2009. https://www.prb.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/ genderperspectives.pdf (accessed June 1, 2018).
25. Pande RP, Falle TY, Rathod S, Edmeades J, Krishnan S. ‘If your husband calls, you have to go’: understanding sexual agency among young married women in urban South India. Sex Health 2011; 8: 102–09.
26. Constantine NA, Jerman P, Berglas NF, Angulo-Olaiz F, Chou CP, Rohrbach LA. Short-term effects of a rights-based sexuality education curriculum for high-school students: a cluster-randomized trial. BMC Public Health 2015; 15: 293.
27. Daniel EE, Nanda R. The effect of reproductive health communication interventions on age at marriage and first birth in rural Bihar, India: a retrospective study. Watertown, MA: Pathfinder International, 2012. https://www.pathfinder.org/wp-content/ uploads/2016/11/The-Effect-of-Reproductive-healthCommunication-Interventions-on-Age-at-Marriage-and-First-Birthin-Rural-Bihar-India.pdf (accessed April 30, 2018).
28. Diop N, Faye MM, Moreau A, et al. The TOSTAN program: evaluation of a community based education program in Senegal. Population Council, 2004. https://www.k4health.org/sites/default/ files/TOSTAN%20program_Evaluation%20of %20CommBased%20 Edu%20Pgm_Senegal.pdf (accessed April 30, 2018).
29. Dunbar MS, Kang Dufour MS, Lambdin B, Mudekunye-Mahaka I, Nhamo D, Padian NS. The SHAZ! project: results from a pilot randomized trial of a structural intervention to prevent HIV among adolescent women in Zimbabwe. PLoS One 2014; 9: e113621.
30. Kanesathasan A, Cardinal LJ, Pearson E, Das Gupta S, Mukherjee S, Malhotra A. Catalyzing change: improving youth sexual and reproductive health through Disha, an integrated program in India. International Center for Research on Women. 2008. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/CatalyzingChange-Improving-Youth-Sexual-and-Reproductive-HealthThrough-disha-an-Integrated-Program-in-India-DISHA-Report.pdf (accessed April 30, 2018).
31. Kyegombe N, Abramsky T, Devries KM, et al. The impact of SASA!, a community mobilization intervention, on reported HIV-related risk behaviours and relationship dynamics in Kampala, Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc 2014; 17: 19232.
32. Maticka-Tyndale E, Wildish J, Gichuru M. Quasi-experimental evaluation of a national primary school HIV intervention in Kenya. Eval Program Plann 2007; 30: 172–86.
33. Midhet F, Becker S. Impact of community-based interventions on maternal and neonatal health indicators: results from a community randomized trial in rural Balochistan, Pakistan. Reprod Health 2010; 7: 30.
34. Paine K, Hart G, Jawo M, et al. ‘Before we were sleeping, now we are awake’: preliminary evaluation of the Stepping Stones sexual health programme in The Gambia. Afr J AIDS Res 2002; 1: 39–50.
35. Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, et al. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomised trial. Lancet 2006; 368: 1973–83.
36. Pulerwitz J, Barker G, Segundo M, Nascimento M. Promoting more gender-equitable norms and behaviors among young men as an HIV/AIDS prevention strategy. Horizons final report. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2006. https:// promundoglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/PromotingEquitable-Gender-Norms-and-Behaviors-English.pdf (accessed April 30, 2018).
37. Santhya KG, Haberland N, Das A, et al. Empowering married young women and improving their sexual and reproductive health: efefcts of the First-time Parents Project. New Delhi: Population Council, 2008. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Women/ WRGS/ForcedMarriage/NGO/PopulationCouncil23.pdf (accessed April 30, 2018).
38. Smith LC, Kahn F, Frankenberger TR, Wadud A. Admissible evidence in the court of development evaluation? The impact of CARE’s SHOUHARDO project on child stunting in Bangladesh. IDS working paper volume 2011, number 376. Brighton: IDS, 2011. http://www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/Wp376.pdf (accessed April 30, 2018).
39. Solórzano I, Bank A, Peña R, Espinoza H, Ellsberg M, Pulerwitz J. Catalyzing personal and social change around gender, sexuality, and HIV: impact evaluation of Puntos de Encuentro’s communication strategy in Nicaragua. Washington, DC: Population Council, 2008. http://www.endvawnow.org/uploads/browser/files/sexto_sentido_ impact_evaluation_english.pdf (accessed April 30, 2018).
40. Swendeman D, Basu I, Das S, Jana S, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Empowering sex workers in India to reduce vulnerability to HIV and sexually transmitted diseases. Soc Sci Med 2009; 69: 1157–66.
41. Wolfe DA, Crooks C, Jaffe P, et al. A school-based program to prevent adolescent dating violence: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163: 692–99.
42. Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). Geneva: WHO, 2010. http://apps.who. int/iris/bitstream/10665/44489/1/9789241500852_eng.pdf (accessed June 1, 2018).
43. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q 1988; 15: 351–77.
44. Berger LM, Waldfogel J. Maternity leave and the employment of new mothers in the United States. J Popul Econ 2004; 17: 331–49.
45. Baum CL, Ruhm CJ. The effects of paid family leave in California on labor market outcomes. J Pol Anal Manage 2016; 35: 333–56.
46. Byker TS. Paid parental leave laws in the United States: does short-duration leave affect women’s labor-force attachment? AEA Pap Proc 2016; 106: 242–46.
47. Lalive R, Zweimüller J. How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. Q J Econ 2009; 24: 1363–402.
48. Schönberg U, Ludsteck J. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers’ labor market outcomes after childbirth. J Labor Econ 2014; 32: 469–505.
49. Waldfogel J, Higuchi Y, Abe M. Family leave policies and women’s retention after childbirth: evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. J Popul Econ 1999; 12: 523–45.
50. Baker M, Milligan K. How does job-protected maternity leave affect mothers’ employment? J Labor Econ 2008; 26: 655–91.
51. Donald A, Koolwal G, Annan J, Falb K, Goldstein M. Measuring women’s agency. Policy research working paper 8148. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/ en/333481500385677886/Measuring-womens-agency (accessed Feb 13, 2019).
52. Hagqvist E, Nordenmark M, Pérez G, Trujillo Alemán S, Gillander Gådin K. Parental leave policies and time use for mothers and fathers: a case study of Spain and Sweden. Soc Health Vulnerability 2017; 8: 1374103.
53. Hook JL. Care in context: men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. Am Sociol Rev 2006; 71: 639–60.
54. Estes SB. How are work–family policies related to the gendered division of domestic labor? Sociol Compass 2011; 5: 233–43.
55. Schober P. Maternal labor market return, parental leave policies, and gender inequality in housework. German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) paper 422-2011. Berlin: SOEP, 2011. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.391133. de/diw_sp0422.pdf (accessed Feb 13, 2019).
56. Dearing H. Gender equality in the division of work: how to assess European leave policies regarding their compliance with an ideal leave model. J Eur Soc Policy 2016; 26: 234–47.
57. O’Brien M. Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: international perspectives and policy impact. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2009; 624: 190–213.
58. Unterhofer U, Wrohlich K. Fathers, parental leave and gender norms. Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) discussion paper 10712. Bonn: IZA, 2017. http://ftp.iza.org/dp10712.pdf (accessed Feb 13, 2019).
59. Al-Samarrai S, Zaman H. Abolishing school fees in Malawi: the impact on education access and equity. Educ Econ 2007; 15: 359–75.
60. Deininger K. Does cost of schooling affect enrollment by the poor? Universal primary education in Uganda. Econ Educ Rev 2003; 22: 291–305.
61. Daku M, Raub A, Heymann J. Maternal leave policies and vaccination coverage: a global analysis. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74: 120–24.
62. Hajizadeh M, Heymann J, Strumpf E, Harper S, Nandi A. Paid maternity leave and childhood vaccination uptake: longitudinal evidence from 20 low- and-middle-income countries. Soc Sci Med 2015; 140: 104–17.
63. Nandi A, Hajizadeh M, Harper S, Koski A, Strumpf EC, Heymann J. Increased duration of paid maternity leave lowers infant mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a quasi-experimental study. PLoS Med 2016; 13: e1001985.
64. Heymann J, Raub A, Earle A. Creating and using new data sources to analyze the relationship between social policy and global health: the case of maternal leave. Public Health Rep 2011; 126 (suppl 3): 127–34.
65. Quamruzzaman A, Mendoza JM, Heymann J, Kaufman JS, Nandi A. Are tuition-free primary education policies associated with lower infant and neonatal mortality in low- and middle-income countries? Soc Sci Med 2014; 120: 153–59.
66. WORLD Policy Analysis Center. Methodology. https://www. worldpolicycenter.org/methodology (accessed Feb 26, 2019).
67. UNESCO. Observatory on the right to education. http://www. unesco.org/education/edurights/ (accessed Oct 1, 2017).
68. Policy Relevant Observational Studies for Population Health Equity and Responsible Development. Adult labour policy databases. https://www.prosperedproject.com/database-introduction (accessed April 15, 2018).
69. Mackie G, Moneti F, Shakya H, Denny E. What are social norms? How are they measured? San Diego, CA: UNICEF/University of California—San Diego Center on Global Justice, 2015. http://www.unicef.org/protection/files/4_09_30_Whole_What_are_ Social_Norms.pdf (accessed March 26, 2018).
70. Kishor S, Subaiya L. Understanding women’s empowerment: a comparative analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data. DHS comparative reports 20. Calverton, MD: MEASURE DHS, 2008. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/CR20/CR20.pdf (accessed Feb 19, 2018).
71. Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.
72. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol 1982; 13: 290–312.
73. Sen G, Östlin P. Gender equity in health: the shifting frontiers of evidence and action. New York, NY: Routledge, 2010.
74. Bhalotra S, Clots-Figueras I. Health and the political agency of women. Am Econ J Econ Policy 2014; 6: 164–97.
75. Beaman L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. Powerful women: does exposure reduce bias? Q J Econ 2009; 124: 1497–540.
76. Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science 2012; 335: 582–86.
77. Kalsi P. Seeing is believing: can increasing the number of female leaders reduce sex selection in rural India? J Dev Econ 2017; 126: 1–18.
78. Iyer L, Mani A, Mishra P, Topalova P. The power of political voice: women’s political representation and crime in India. Am Econ J Appl Econ 2012; 4: 165–93.
79. Stotsky JG, Kolovich L, Kebhaj S. Sub-Saharan Africa: a survey of gender budgeting efforts. IMF working paper 16/152. Washington, DC: IMF, 2016. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2016/ wp16152.pdf (accessed May 17, 2018).
80. Office of the Prime Minister, Rwanda. Law on state finances and property. http://www.minecofni.gov.rw/fileadmin/_migrated/ content_uploads/Law_on_State_Finances_and_Property.pdf (accessed July 10, 2018).
81. Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, Rwanda. Gender budgeting guidelines. Kigali: Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) of Rwanda, 2008. https://migeprof.gov.rw/ fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/GENDER_BUDGETING_ GUIDELINES-2.pdf (accessed Feb 14, 2019).
82. IPPR. Women in the budget: an exploration of Namibia’s gender budgeting processes. Special briefing report no 21. Windhoek: Institute for Public Policy Research, 2018. https://ippr.org.na/wpcontent/uploads/2018/03/1_SpecialReport_GBV_WEB.pdf (accessed Feb 14, 2019).
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink