29 lines
1,013 B
Markdown
29 lines
1,013 B
Markdown
|
# Meeting Miguel 2024-02-09
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
achieved:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] studies screened
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] focus now:
|
||
|
|
- table reviewing main findings and strength of evidence
|
||
|
|
- screen the remaining 200 studies
|
||
|
|
- improve the writing on the synthesis itself
|
||
|
|
- to adhere a little closer to
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] questions:
|
||
|
|
- logistical:
|
||
|
|
- create extraction matrices with main/statistical findings
|
||
|
|
- are we going to put those in the main Appendix?
|
||
|
|
or do we just pass on the CSV extraction as the data?
|
||
|
|
- is there a specific length I am going for for the end result?
|
||
|
|
- is it fine if for now I leave intro/conclusion more vague to fit in with rest of the document
|
||
|
|
- writing:
|
||
|
|
- categories overlap sometimes, of course
|
||
|
|
- a study on NREGS in India which has minimum wage effects as primary channel
|
||
|
|
- a study on vocational training which fuses it with workfare program (ALMP)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- [ ] TODO
|
||
|
|
- main findings table still remaining
|
||
|
|
- write it out
|
||
|
|
- shorten?
|