datasci/analysis-voidlinux-popcorn
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Re-enable in-text computations

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Marty Oehme 2025-10-08 21:14:01 +02:00
parent 2c5cf37b2c
commit c9e12252fd
Signed by: Marty
GPG key ID: 4E535BC19C61886E
3 changed files with 41 additions and 30 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

21
popcorn.qmd
View file

@ -321,11 +321,11 @@ thirty_plus = df_pkg_dl.sort("count", descending=False).filter((pl.col("count")
```
To be more precise with the numbers:
There are `python f"{get_num(one_ten_installs):,}"` packages which have between one
There are `{python} f"{get_num(one_ten_installs):,}"` packages which have between one
and ten installations in the data, `python f"{get_num(ten_twenty_installs):,}"`
packages between eleven and 20 installations, and
`python f"{get_num(twenty_thirty):,}"` packages between 21 and 30 installations.
`python f"{get_num(thirty_plus):,}"` packages have over 30 installations.
`{python} f"{get_num(twenty_thirty):,}"` packages between 21 and 30 installations.
`{python} f"{get_num(thirty_plus):,}"` packages have over 30 installations.
For now, these are the explorations I have done for the package data collected.
I think it is interesting to see, especially the evolution of package installations over time,
@ -384,13 +384,22 @@ and kernel 6 right after the report slump happened.
This, in all likelihood, accounts for the slight imbalance between the numbers,
and will shift over the coming months.
```{python}
from notebooks.popcorn import df_kernel_v99
_, defs = df_kernel_v99.run() # pyright: ignore
kernel_df_v99 = defs["kernel_df_v99"]
v99_num_rows = f"{kernel_df_v99.select(pl.len()).item()}"
v99_start_date = f"{kernel_df_v99.select("date").row(0)[0]}"
v99_end_date = f"{kernel_df_v99.select("date").row(-1)[0]}"
```
Just like with kernel suffixes, for this analysis we also had to exclude
{kernel_df_v99.select(pl.len()).item()} rows which were apparently from the
`{python} v99_num_rows` rows which were apparently from the
future --- as they were running variations of major kernel version 99. In all
likelihood there is a custom compiled kernel version out there which reports its own
major version as 99. The strange version starts appearing on
{kernel_df_v99.select("date").row(0)0} and shows up all the way until
{kernel_df_v99.select("date").row(-1)[0]}.
`{python} v99_start_date` and shows up all the way until
`{python} v99_end_date`.
Let's turn to the actual adoption of kernels over time in the next visualization.