Remove roadmap from README, add plugin status note
This commit is contained in:
parent
7684a0370a
commit
836079cecb
1 changed files with 15 additions and 22 deletions
37
README.md
37
README.md
|
@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
|
||||||
# pubs-extract
|
# pubs-extract
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[![status-badge](https://ci.martyoeh.me/api/badges/Marty/pubs-extract/status.svg)](https://ci.martyoeh.me/Marty/pubs-extract)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Quickly extract annotations from your pdf files with the help of the pubs bibliography manager.
|
Quickly extract annotations from your pdf files with the help of the pubs bibliography manager.
|
||||||
|
Easily organize your highlights and thoughts next to your documents.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Installation:
|
## Installation:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -19,6 +22,9 @@ active = extract
|
||||||
To check if everything is working you can do `pubs --help` which should show you the new extract command.
|
To check if everything is working you can do `pubs --help` which should show you the new extract command.
|
||||||
You will be set up with the default options but if you want to change anything, read on in configuration below.
|
You will be set up with the default options but if you want to change anything, read on in configuration below.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
> **Note**
|
||||||
|
> This plugin is in fairly early development. It does what I need it to do, but if you have a meticulously organized library *please* make backups before doing any operation on your notes, or make use of the pubs-included git plugin.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Configuration:
|
## Configuration:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In your pubs configuration file:
|
In your pubs configuration file:
|
||||||
|
@ -150,7 +156,7 @@ Pull requests tackling one of these areas of course very welcome.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Issues
|
## Issues
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A note on the extraction. Highlights in pdfs can be somewhat difficult to parse
|
A note on the extraction: Highlights in pdfs can be somewhat difficult to parse
|
||||||
(as are most things in them). Sometimes they contain the selected text that is written on the
|
(as are most things in them). Sometimes they contain the selected text that is written on the
|
||||||
page, sometimes they contain the annotators thoughts as a note, sometimes they contain nothing.
|
page, sometimes they contain the annotators thoughts as a note, sometimes they contain nothing.
|
||||||
This plugin makes an effort to find the right combination and extract the written words,
|
This plugin makes an effort to find the right combination and extract the written words,
|
||||||
|
@ -164,25 +170,12 @@ or even cut a few off.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I am not sure if there is much I can do about this.
|
I am not sure if there is much I can do about this.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Roadmap:
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- [x] extracts highlights and annotations from a doc file (e.g. using PyMuPDF)
|
If you spot a bug or have an idea feel free to open an issue.\
|
||||||
- [x] puts those in the annotation file of a doc in a customizable format
|
I might be slow to respond but will consider them all!
|
||||||
- [x] option to have it automatically run after a file is added?
|
|
||||||
- option to have it run whenever a pdf in the library was updated?
|
Pull requests are warmly welcomed.\
|
||||||
- [ ] needs some way to delimit where it puts stuff and user stuff is in note
|
If they are big changes or additions let's talk about them in an issue first.
|
||||||
- [ ] one way is to have it look at `> [17] here be extracted annotation from page seventeen` annotations and put it in between
|
|
||||||
- [x] another, probably simpler first, is to just append missing annotations to the end of the note
|
Thanks for using my software ❤️
|
||||||
- [ ] use similarity search instead of literal search for existing annotation (levenshtein)?
|
|
||||||
- [x] some highlights (or annotations in general) do not contain text as content
|
|
||||||
- [x] pymupdf can extract the content of the underlying rectangle (mostly)
|
|
||||||
- [x] issue is that sometimes the highlight contents are in content, sometimes a user comment instead
|
|
||||||
- [x] we could have a comparison function which estimates how 'close' the two text snippets are and act accordingly -> using levenshtein distance
|
|
||||||
- [ ] sometimes the underyling rectangle is empty too, what to do then? discard annotation?
|
|
||||||
- [x] config option to map colors in annotations to meaning ('read', 'important', 'extra') in pubs
|
|
||||||
- [x] colors are given in very exact 0.6509979 RGB values, meaning we could once again estimate if a color is 'close enough' in distance to tag it accordingly -> using euclidian distance
|
|
||||||
- [ ] support custom colors by setting a float tuple in configuration
|
|
||||||
- [x] make invoking the command run a query if corresponding option provided (or whatever) in pubs syntax and use resulting papers
|
|
||||||
- [x] confirm for many papers?
|
|
||||||
- [ ] warning when the amount of annotations in file is different than the amount extracted?
|
|
||||||
- [ ] tests tests tests tests tests, lah-di-dah
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue