abstract: 'Background: Social innovation has been applied increasingly to achieve social goals, including improved healthcare delivery, despite a lack of conceptual clarity and consensus on its definition. Beyond its tangible artefacts to address societal and structural needs, social innovation can best be understood as innovation in social relations, in power dynamics and in governance transformations, and may include institutional and systems transformations. Methods: A scoping review was conducted of empirical studies published in the past 10 years, to identify how social innovation in healthcare has been applied, the enablers and barriers affecting its operation, and gaps in the current literature. A number of disciplinary databases were searched between April and June 2020, including Academic Source Complete, CIHAHL, Business Source Complete Psych INFO, PubMed and Global Health. A 10-year publication time frame was selected and articles limited to English text. Studies for final inclusion was based on a pre-defined criteria. Results: Of the 27 studies included in this review, the majority adopted a case research methodology. Half of these were from authors outside the health sector working in high-income countries (HIC). Social innovation was seen to provide creative solutions to address barriers associated with access and cost of care in both low- and middle-income countries and HIC settings in a variety of disease focus areas. Compared to studies in other disciplines, health researchers applied social innovation mainly from an instrumental and technocratic standpoint to foster greater patient and beneficiary participation in health programmes. No empirical evidence was presented on whether this process leads to empowerment, and social innovation was not presented as transformative. The studies provided practical insights on how implementing social innovation in health systems and practice can be enhanced. Conclusions: Based on theoretical literature, social innovation has the potential to mobilise institutional and systems change, yet research in health has not yet fully explored this dimension. Thus far, social innovation has been applied to extend population and financial coverage, principles inherent in universal health coverage and central to SDG 3.8. However, limitations exist in conceptualising social innovation and applying its theoretical and multidisciplinary underpinnings in health research.' affiliation: 'van Niekerk, L (Corresponding Author), London Sch Hyg \& Trop Med, London, England. van Niekerk, Lindi; Balabanova, Dina, London Sch Hyg \& Trop Med, London, England. Manderson, Lenore, Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Publ Hlth, Johannesburg, South Africa. Manderson, Lenore, Monash Univ, Sch Social Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia.' article-number: '26' author: van Niekerk, Lindi and Manderson, Lenore and Balabanova, Dina author-email: lindivn@gmail.com author_list: - family: van Niekerk given: Lindi - family: Manderson given: Lenore - family: Balabanova given: Dina da: '2023-09-28' doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00794-8 eissn: 2049-9957 files: [] issn: 2095-5162 journal: INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF POVERTY keywords: Barriers to care; Healthcare; Social innovation; Systems change keywords-plus: PUBLIC-HEALTH; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; INSTITUTIONS; CHALLENGES language: English month: MAR 8 number: '1' number-of-cited-references: '89' orcid-numbers: Balabanova, Dina/0000-0001-7163-3428 papis_id: 39594bac87f23409abb4f8ac28aed99c ref: Vanniekerk2021applicationsocial tags: - review times-cited: '18' title: 'The application of social innovation in healthcare: a scoping review' type: article unique-id: WOS:000626662100001 usage-count-last-180-days: '5' usage-count-since-2013: '34' volume: '10' web-of-science-categories: Infectious Diseases; Parasitology; Tropical Medicine year: '2021'