abstract: 'Objective Despite initiatives promoting research and development, financing, and distribution programs for assistive technology (AT), people with diverse disabilities still experience a critical gap in awareness and acquisition of suitable technology products. The nature of significant barriers to the effective use of AT service delivery has been the subject of considerable speculation, but has not been well researched. There is a lack of scientifically rigorous research on which specific elements of AT service delivery achieve improved employment outcomes with efficient management of costs, and why. Additionally, service providers lack an evidence-based and validated framework to internally examine their own service delivery processes, policies, and practices and assess their effectiveness in generating successful employment and other participation outcomes for consumers. Main Content This paper will discuss the conceptualization, development, and testing of quality indicators of AT service delivery that result in successful employment outcomes. This work is being conducted by the Center on Effective Rehabilitation Technology (CERT) service delivery which has used a rigorous mixed methods process to generate quality indicators: (a) thorough literature review to identify core assessment categories, (b) feedback from a diverse panel of stakeholders, (c) results from a baseline survey of AT practice in the United States, and (d) an iterative review and feedback method to generate and rate the quality indicators with a panel of experts. The framework will be further tested and validated through mixed-methods studies with diverse service providers, including employers, throughout the United States. Results Indicators of quality have been identified across nine major categories which are: (1) Organizational Governing Structures, (2) Personnel, (3) Consumer Outcomes, (4) Policies and Procedures, (5) Stakeholder Collaboration, (6) Service Delivery Models, (7) Individualized Matching of Person and Technology, (8) Funding, and (9) Quality Control and Evaluation. Conclusion An evidence-based framework for identifying the quality of AT service delivery will offer service providers an efficient and important tool to assess the quality of their systems and will work towards bridging gaps to ensure that AT services promote consumers'' employment and other participation goals. The quality indicators framework will be customizable for use with different types of service providers such as Vocational Rehabilitation agencies, Independent Living Centers, and employers.' affiliation: 'Scherer, M (Corresponding Author), Syracuse Univ, Burton Blatt Inst, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA. Samant, Deepti; Adya, Meera; Scherer, Marcia, Syracuse Univ, Burton Blatt Inst, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA. Babirad, Jurgen, Rehabil Technol Associates Inc, Kinderhook, NY USA. Scherer, Marcia, Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Inst Matching Person \& Technol, Rochester, NY 14627 USA.' author: Samant, Deepti and Adya, Meera and Babirad, Jurgen and Scherer, Marcia author_list: - family: Samant given: Deepti - family: Adya given: Meera - family: Babirad given: Jurgen - family: Scherer given: Marcia booktitle: EVERYDAY TECHNOLOGY FOR INDEPENDENCE AND CARE da: '2023-09-28' doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-814-4-245 editor: Gelderblom, GJ and Soede, M and Adriaens, L and Miesenberger, K files: [] isbn: 978-1-60750-814-4; 978-1-60750-813-7 issn: 1383-813X keywords: 'assistive technology; assistive technology service delivery; quality indicators; employment; workplace' keywords-plus: TECHNOLOGY OUTCOMES RESEARCH language: English note: '11th Bi-Annual AAATE Conference, Maastricht, NETHERLANDS, AUG 31-SEP 02, 2011' number-of-cited-references: '33' orcid-numbers: Scherer, Marcia/0000-0001-8374-6526 pages: 245-253 papis_id: b59f0e74bccc9ca74e3ea24bf411fef9 ref: Samant2011qualityindicators series: Assistive Technology Research Series times-cited: '0' title: A Quality Indicators Framework for effective AT service delivery type: proceedings unique-id: WOS:000393465400032 usage-count-last-180-days: '0' usage-count-since-2013: '0' volume: '29' web-of-science-categories: Rehabilitation year: '2011'