cite: Gilbert2001 author: Gilbert, A., Phimister, E., & Theodossiou, I. year: 2001 title: The potential impact of the minimum wage in rural areas publisher: Regional Studies uri: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120084759 pubtype: article discipline: economic country: United Kingdom period: 1991-1998 maxlength: 84 targeting: implicit group: rural workers data: national administrative panel survey British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) design: observational method: observational methods with counterfactual approach sample: 5500 unit: household representativeness: subnational, rural causal: 1 # 0 correlation / 1 causal theory: limitations: has to assume no effects on employment observation: - intervention: minimum wage institutional: 1 structural: 0 agency: 0 inequality: spatial; income type: 0 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative measures: Gini coeff findings: overall insignificant decrease of income inequality; policy will have spatial dimension with rural households more affected; larger positive impact for remote rural households channels: rural component depends on proximity to urban areas through having access to urban markets direction: -1 # -1 neg / 0 none / 1 pos significance: 1 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg notes: annotation: | A study looking at the distributional effects of introducing a minimum wage in Britain, with a specific spatial component. Overall it finds little effect on income inequality in the country. It finds that the effects on rural areas differ depending on their proximity to urban areas. While overall income inequality only decreases a small amount, the intervention results in effective targeting with remote rural households having around twice the reduction in inequality compared to others. Rural areas that are accessible to urban markets are less affected, with insignificant impacts to overall income inequality reduction. One limit of the study is that it has to assume no effects on employment after the enaction of the minimum wage for its results to hold.