From e9c2a8051164e125f6b88142d582902718d3175c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marty Oehme <marty.oehme@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2024 10:32:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] chore(notes): Add meeting notes for Miguel eoy meeting

---
 03-documentation/meeting_2023-12-23.md | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 03-documentation/meeting_2023-12-23.md

diff --git a/03-documentation/meeting_2023-12-23.md b/03-documentation/meeting_2023-12-23.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..99feacf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/03-documentation/meeting_2023-12-23.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# Meeting Miguel 2023-12-23
+
+achieved:
+
+- [x] fleshed out sections:
+    - education
+    - infrastructural change
+- [ ] discussion filled out
+    - [ ] seen through inequalities, what works what does not
+    - [ ] move existing reviews into discussion
+- more synthesized findings
+- introduction better prepared
+- conclusion?
+
+- we have section on unionisation now
+
+# Remaining issues
+
+- synthesis writing - remains very descriptive for the time being
+- discussion - 
+    - in-text breakdowns exists but missing in tabular representation
+    - still separated from qualitative grouping into more/less effective channels
+- appendix extraction - matrix structure?
+
+# I would aim to do next:
+
+- breakdowns by country income groups
+- create tabular information containing:
+    - indicator (relative/absolute)
+    - horizontal/vertical
+    - causal/correlational
+    - study design
+- move matrices into appendix
+- keep on extracting rest of snowball pool
+
+# questions
+
+- how much to focus on indicators in my analysis
+    - for now mentioning them and have in tabular breakdown
+- the plan is that we hand in a draft report end of year now
+    - but I still hand in my side as scoping review separately?
+
+# 
+
+