From ce2a23147867cb84d21b2e1d557a9bb9db059381 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marty Oehme <marty.oehme@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:49:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] feat(data): Extract Stock2021

---
 02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib             |  5 ++-
 02-data/intermediate/relevant/Stock2021.yml | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++
 02-data/supplementary/lib.bib               |  5 ++-
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 02-data/intermediate/relevant/Stock2021.yml

diff --git a/02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib b/02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib
index 287a51c..a140f8a 100644
--- a/02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib
+++ b/02-data/intermediate/SAMPLE.bib
@@ -11955,7 +11955,7 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
 
 @article{Stock2021,
   type = {Article},
-  title = {Bright as Night: {{Illuminating}} the Antinomies of `gender Positive' Solar Development},
+  title = {Bright as Night: {{Illuminating}} the Antinomies of 'gender Positive' Solar Development},
   author = {Stock, Ryan},
   year = {2021},
   month = feb,
@@ -11974,7 +11974,8 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
   usage-count-last-180-days = {1},
   usage-count-since-2013 = {18},
   web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics},
-  keywords = {country::India,inequality::gender,method::qualitative,method::quantitative,region::AP,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::structural}
+  keywords = {country::India,done::extracted,inequality::gender,method::qualitative,method::quantitative,region::AP,relevant,type::infrastructure},
+  file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/3DCK3GEW/Stock_2021_Bright as night.pdf}
 }
 
 @article{Stoll2000,
diff --git a/02-data/intermediate/relevant/Stock2021.yml b/02-data/intermediate/relevant/Stock2021.yml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8d68be6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/02-data/intermediate/relevant/Stock2021.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+author: Stock, R. (2021).
+year: 2021
+title: "Bright as night: Illuminating the antinomies of `gender positive’ solar development"
+publisher: World Development
+uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105196
+discipline: development
+
+country: India
+period: 2018
+maxlength: 1
+targeting: implicit
+group: women
+data: baseline survey, interviews
+
+design: observational
+method: quantitative survey and in-depth interviews; discourse analysis
+sample: 200
+unit: household
+representativeness: subnational, rural
+causal: 0 # 0 correlation / 1 causal
+
+theory: authoritative knowledge power framework (Laclau&Mouffe)
+limitations: no causal research
+observation:
+  - intervention: infrastructure
+    institutional: 0
+    structural: 1
+    agency: 0
+    inequality: gender; class; spatial
+    type: 1 # 0 vertical / 1 horizontal
+    indicator: 1 # 0 absolute / 1 relative
+    measures: employment; empowerment
+    findings: insignificant increased employment probability; advantaged women predominantly belong to dominant castes
+    channels: project capture by village female elites; women of disadvantaged castes further excluded from training and work opportunities
+    direction: 1 # 0 neg / 1 pos
+    significance: 0 # 0 nsg / 1 msg / 2 sg
+
+notes:
+annotation: | 
+  An observational study looking at the inclusionary or exclusionary effects of the infrastructure development of a solar park in India which specifically aims to work towards micro-scale equality through regional upliftment.
+  The project included a training and temporary employment to local unskilled/semi-skilled labor.
+  It finds that the development instead impacted equality negatively, creating socio-economic exclusion and disproportionately negatively affected women of lower castes.
+  While acquiring basic additional skills, none of the women participating in training remained connected to the operators of the solar park and none were hired. 
+  An insignificant amount of women from local villages were working at the solar park, of which most belonged to the the dominant caste, and the redistributive potential was stymied through capture by village female elites.
+  The author suggests this is an example of institutional design neglecting individual agency and structural power relations, especially intersectional inequalities between gender and caste.
+  The study is limited in explanatory power through its observational design, not being able to make causal inferences.
diff --git a/02-data/supplementary/lib.bib b/02-data/supplementary/lib.bib
index 13f458c..30cc06c 100644
--- a/02-data/supplementary/lib.bib
+++ b/02-data/supplementary/lib.bib
@@ -12250,7 +12250,7 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
 
 @article{Stock2021,
   type = {Article},
-  title = {Bright as Night: {{Illuminating}} the Antinomies of `gender Positive' Solar Development},
+  title = {Bright as Night: {{Illuminating}} the Antinomies of 'gender Positive' Solar Development},
   author = {Stock, Ryan},
   year = {2021},
   month = feb,
@@ -12269,7 +12269,8 @@ does NOT look at policy impacts (but theories behind it)}
   usage-count-last-180-days = {1},
   usage-count-since-2013 = {18},
   web-of-science-categories = {Development Studies; Economics},
-  keywords = {country::India,inequality::gender,method::qualitative,method::quantitative,region::AP,relevant,TODO::full-text,type::structural}
+  keywords = {country::India,done::extracted,inequality::gender,method::qualitative,method::quantitative,region::AP,relevant,type::infrastructure},
+  file = {/home/marty/Zotero/storage/3DCK3GEW/Stock_2021_Bright as night.pdf}
 }
 
 @article{Stoll2000,