From a9062e99848b4a180d9b0a877d75be3780622dbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marty Oehme <marty.oehme@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:13:42 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] feat(notes): Begin creating data for main findings tables

---
 03-documentation/findings-per-policy-area.md | 225 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 225 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 03-documentation/findings-per-policy-area.md

diff --git a/03-documentation/findings-per-policy-area.md b/03-documentation/findings-per-policy-area.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e38ea78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/03-documentation/findings-per-policy-area.md
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+# Summary of study findings
+
+## Institutional
+
+### Labour laws / regulatory systems
+
+policies:
+
+- universal paid leave (maternal) [@Broadway2020]
+- paid leave (maternal) [@Dustmann2012]
+- paid leave (maternal) [@Mun2018]
+- contract formality regulation [@Davies2022]
+
+findings:
+
+- universal paid leave can significantly increase rtw [@Broadway2020]
+- positive rtw effects often show with medium-/long-term time-delay [@Broadway2020]
+- long-term leave periods (36months) may decrease positive wage,rtw,children's educational outcomes [@Dustmann2012]
+- paid leave does not increase female hiring pattern discrimination [@Mun2018]
+- short-term/fixed contracts can significantly decrease female rtw after maternity [@Davies2022]
+= for equality?
+
+channels:
+
+- disadvantaged mothers benefit through supplanting employer-funded leave [@Broadway2020]
+- maternal leave programs can reinforce existing household labor gender divisions [@Mun2018]
+- fixed-term contracts can have insufficient cover for otherwise applicable laws [@Davies2022]
+
+inequalities:
+
+- gender Broadway2020 Dustmann2012 Mun2018 Davies2022
+
+number:
+
+Broadway2020 + national
+Dustmann2012 - national
+Mun2018 + Japanese
+Davies2022 + UK-high ED
+
+### Protective environmental policies
+
+policies:
+
+energy sector sustainability work [@Kuriyama2021]
+
+findings:
+
+- emphasis on sustainable industries can decrease spatial inequality especially for rural regions [@Kuriyama2021]
+- targeting important to avoid reinforcing existing inequalities [@Stock2021]
+
+channels:
+
+- additional employment probability through rural energy projects [@Kuriyama2021]
+- social exclusion through elite capture of policies [@Stock2021]
+
+inequalities:
+
+- spatial Kuriyama2021
+- gender Stock2021
+
+number:
+
+Kuriyama2021 + Japanese-EnergySector
+Stock2021 - India-case-study
+
+
+### Minimum wage laws
+
+policies:
+
+- minimum wage introduction [@Chao2022] [@Gilber2001] [@SilveriaNeto2011]
+- minimum wage increase [@Alinaghi2020] [@Wong2019] [@Militaru2019] [@Sotomayor2021]
+
+findings:
+
+- short-term decreased income inequality [@Sotomayor2021]
+- long-term decreased wage inequality [@Chao2022] [@SilveriaNeto2011]
+- negligible impact on wage inequality [@Alinaghi2020] [@Gilber2001] [@Sotomayor2021]
+- larger impacts for single parents [@Alinaghi2020]
+- larger impacts for rural/disadvantaged areas [@Gilber2001] [@SilveriaNeto2011]
+- specifically targeting disadvanteged/low-earner households important for positive equality effects [@Alinaghi2020]
+- can lead to income-compression at high-earner end [@Wong2019]
+- may reinforce gender wage gap [@Wong2019]
+- may decrease gender wage gap [@Militaru2019]
+
+channels:
+
+- exit from urban manufacturing, reinforcing rural agricultural sectors [@Chao2022]
+- reaching many low-wage earners as secondary high-income household earners, but often low-wage households no wage earners at all -> bad targeting [@Alinaghi2020]
+- many women make up lower-earners, larger effect [@Militaru2019]
+- have negative effect on women's hours worked depending on household care/waged work division [@Wong2019]
+- job loss offset through higher wages [@Sotomayor2021]
+
+inequalities:
+
+- income [@Chao2022] [@Alinaghi2020] [@Gilber2001] [@SilveriaNeto2011] [@Wong2019] [@Sotomayor2021] [@Militaru2019]
+- spatial [@Chao2022] [@Gilber2001] [@SilveriaNeto2011]
+- gender [@Wong2019] [@Militaru2019]
+
+number:
+
+Chao2022 - global
+Alinaghi2020 + national
+Wong2019 + national(economicgrowth)
+Gilbert2001 + national(specific to Britain)
+SilveriaNeto2011 + national
+Militaru2019 - national
+Sotomayor2021 + national
+
+### Collective bargaining
+
+policies:
+
+- unionisation [@Alexiou2023] [@Ferguson2015]
+- collective negotiation practices [@Cardinaleschi2015]
+
+findings:
+
+- strong unionisation strongly related to decreasing income inequality [@Alexiou2023]
+- marginally positive relation to increased representation of women & minorities [@Ferguson2015]
+- marginally positive relation to closing gender pay gap [@Cardinaleschi2015]
+
+channels:
+
+- redistribution of political power through collective mobilisation [@Alexiou2023]
+- reciprocal relationship with distribution of political power [@Ahumada2023]
+- fostering more vertically equal redistributive policies [@Alexiou2023]
+- possible self-selection of minorities into more unionised enterprises [@Ferguson2015]
+- predominantly median part of wage distribution affected by collective negotiation [@Cardinaleschi2015]
+
+inequalities:
+
+- income [@Alexiou2023] [@Cardinaleschi2015] [@Ahumada2023]
+- gender [@Ferguson2015] [@Cardinaleschi2015]
+- racial [@Ferguson2015]
+
+number:
+
+Alexiou2023 - national
+Ferguson2015 - national
+Cardinaleschi2015 - national
+Ahumada2023 - national (less generalizable)
+
+### Workfare programmes
+
+policies:
+
+- workfare programme [@Whitworth2021] [@Li2022]
+
+findings:
+
+- workfare programmes can engender vertical inequality reduction while worsening spatial inequalities [@Whitworth2021]
+- higher job-provision outcomes may be achieved in contexts of lower prior material inequalities [@Li2022]
+
+channels:
+
+- job-deprived areas can experience further deprivations if not specifically targeted
+- land-ownership inequalities can increase inequality of political power, lead to political capture
+
+inequalities:
+
+- spatial [@Whitworth2021]
+- income [@Li2022]
+
+number:
+
+Whitworth2021 - subnational, rural
+Li2022 - national census
+
+### Social protection
+
+policies:
+
+- social assistance [@Wang2016]
+- conditional cash transfer [@Debowicz2014]
+- childcare subsidies [@Hardoy2015]
+- healthcare subsidy [@Carstens2018]
+
+findings:
+
+- real social income benefit levels generally rising [@Wang2016]
+- stagnating/decreasing income replacement rates may exacerbate existing inequalities [@Wang2016]
+- conditional cash transfers can produce both short-term and long-term positive income equality effects [@Debowicz2014]
+- evidence for childcare subsidies decreasing gender inequalities and increasing female labour force participation [@Hardoy2015]
+- healthcare subsidies impacts strongly dependent on correct targeting [@Carstens2018]
+
+channels:
+
+- benefit levels not being linked to wages can widen schisms between income groups [@Wang2016]
+- cash-influx lifts credit constraint effects in short-term [@Debowicz2014]
+- conditioning transfers on school attendance can generate decreased educational inequalities in long-term [@Debowicz2014]
+- childcare subsidy correct targeting can especially affect lower-income households through lifting credit constraints [@Hardoy2015]
+- subsidies which depend on not being able to participate in labour market may generate benefit trap [@Carstens2018]
+
+inequalities:
+
+- income [@Wang2016] [@Debowicz2014]
+- gender [@Hardoy2015]
+
+number:
+
+Wang2016 - regional (national census-constructed datasets)
+Debowicz2014 - national (survey)
+Hardoy2015 + (DID) national (census)
+Carstens2018
+
+
+
+
+
+policies:
+
+findings:
+
+channels:
+
+inequalities:
+
+number:
+
+###  Identified limitations/missing
+
+- regional distribution?
+- causal/correlational
+