From 897af88acef734f07c93c666770a1fe3bc702e1f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marty Oehme Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:34:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add meeting notes 2023-10-10 --- 03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-09-15.md | 1 - 03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-10-10.md | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-10-10.md diff --git a/03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-09-15.md b/03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-09-15.md index 7cf74fe..a396544 100644 --- a/03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-09-15.md +++ b/03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-09-15.md @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ ## Typology - Pre-existing inequalities: - Gender Inequality: Gender inequality is a significant concern in the world of work. It encompasses disparities in wages, job opportunities, representation in leadership positions, and workplace discrimination based on gender. diff --git a/03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-10-10.md b/03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-10-10.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c3bb9dc --- /dev/null +++ b/03-supplementary_data/meeting_2023-10-10.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# Meeting notes 2023-09-15 + +## Questions/issues + +Points: + - Ensure I am on right track with inclusion criteria at inequality-intervention-outcome nexus + +Q: + - Which format best to start producing annotated bibliography in for end of month + - Should we include purely qualitative reviews? + - Capture them (in study screening) and tag accordingly + - If including gray literature, I would propose specifically highlighting its status (i.e. adding it through footnotes or otherwise distinguish) + - Some possibilities of avoiding docx for review itself to automate some of its descriptive statistics, etc. + +- What is the best way to go about integrating + - I keep all my notes in the notes folder and zotero library + - I continuously update a docx file called 'Scoping_Review_WIP.docx' + - The individual milestones/approved and agreed upon changes are pushed to 'Scoping_Review.docx' + +## Updates + +- Natassia will work on a variety of indicators etc used + - e.g. brought forth in ILOStat or LSMS +- proposing policy categorization in 3 dimensions (for extraction of intervention properties): + - institutional: changing the institutional *environment* of a country/context + - related to changes in institutions + - e.g. legal reforms adopted, adoption of supranational agreements (like Child Labour Convention/Recommendation), policies transforming the way of building/constructing/makeup of institutions, policies furthering institutional social protection of workers, ... + - structural: interventions changing the *structural* conditions for people + - *can* be related to institutional changes but also to others + - e.g. looking at the way factors of globalization shapes outcomes; technology adoption (digital transformation or green revolution); changing geographical conditions through new transportation, or access to services; or improving access to for example access to electricity or improving WASH + - agency/social-norms: related to lowering impact of individual characteristics of persons and empowering them individually + - e.g. looking at the roots of why women/lgbtq/old people have a harder time finding jobs; policies towards affirmative action +- using all 3 indicators (yesno/boolean) in matrix also enables more intersectional look at policies, by seeing which ones attack issues from variety of angles and e.g. which ones focus on a single one +- should allow to substantiate with solid theory and backing through existing mechanisms identified in literature + +## ToDo + +- [ ] need to identify terms for further search: + - [ ] 'definitions of concepts of employment creation'; employment outcomes + - [ ] e.g. job creation, work creation, workplace creation + - [ ] find the variety of interventions impacting employment + - [ ] e.g. infrastructure development, distributive interventions, cash transfer etc + - [ ] use Miguel introduced 3-dimension categorization for now +- [ ] capture indicator: relative/absolute used in studies (extract) + - [ ] e.g. diff in total number of jobs per gender (absolute) vs change of job distribution in pct (relative) + - [ ] many will share pct looks at these +- [ ] capture policy intervention type used (extract): + - [ ] see above for policy categorization, introduce in extraction list + - [ ] create small scale-based justification for three clusters +- [ ] create clear inclusion/exclusion criteria on basis of above (esp LM outcomes & policy terms) + +- [ ] personally: find exact definitions for: + - indicators + - measures + - ratios + - and which ones are relative (ratios?) and absolute (measures?) and a comprehensive term (indic.?)