Add wos sample results library
This commit is contained in:
parent
6305e61d1f
commit
19e409ad85
2173 changed files with 235628 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
|||
abstract: 'Uruguay began liberalizing its economy in the 1970s. The process
|
||||
|
||||
continued through the 1990s when the country joined Mercosur. The
|
||||
|
||||
reforms were mainly oriented at liberalizing trade and financial flows,
|
||||
|
||||
much less was done in terms of privatization and public sector reform.
|
||||
|
||||
Uruguay established itself as a regional financial and offshore banking
|
||||
|
||||
centre. In the early 1990s, inflation was stabilized on the basis of
|
||||
|
||||
high capital inflows and a stabilization policy that used the exchange
|
||||
|
||||
rate as a nominal anchor. The ensuing real exchange rate appreciation
|
||||
|
||||
harmed export growth with the rest of the world and, along with the
|
||||
|
||||
surge in capital inflows, pushed up import demand. Real appreciation of
|
||||
|
||||
the exchange rate against Uruguay''s trading partners in Mercosur was
|
||||
|
||||
virtually nil and exports benefited from the new set of trade
|
||||
|
||||
preferences within the group. This made macroeconomic performance in
|
||||
|
||||
Uruguay strongly dependent on the business cycle in Argentina and
|
||||
|
||||
Brazil. When these two countries shifted away from a fix on the nominal
|
||||
|
||||
exchange rate, starting with the floating of the Brazilian real,
|
||||
|
||||
Uruguay''s exports were severely hit pushing the economy into recession.
|
||||
|
||||
The recession was deepened with Argentina''s crisis at the turn of the
|
||||
|
||||
century. Uruguay''s economic recovery from the sharp decline in the first
|
||||
|
||||
half of the 1980s thus lasted until 1998. Employment increased, despite
|
||||
|
||||
job losses in agriculture and manufacturing following productivity
|
||||
|
||||
growth associated with the opening process. Employment growth was
|
||||
|
||||
particularly strong in services. Job shedding in manufacturing was also
|
||||
|
||||
associated with a fall-out of many firms in import-competing sectors.
|
||||
|
||||
Real labour incomes also increased during this period of growth. Skilled
|
||||
|
||||
workers were the main beneficiaries as structural adjustment made
|
||||
|
||||
production more skill intensive. Labour income inequality increased, but
|
||||
|
||||
overall employment and real wage increases allowed for a visible
|
||||
|
||||
reduction in poverty. These trends reversed after 1998. Simulations with
|
||||
|
||||
the computable general equilibrium for Uruguay confirm the positive
|
||||
|
||||
effects of trade liberalization in the context of an appreciated
|
||||
|
||||
exchange rate on growth and poverty reduction. The simulations also
|
||||
|
||||
suggest that further negotiated trade liberalization in the context of
|
||||
|
||||
the Free Trade Area of the Americas or the World Trade Organization
|
||||
|
||||
(WTO) would reinforce these effects. With further unilateral trade
|
||||
|
||||
liberalization export growth would require maintaining the exchange rate
|
||||
|
||||
competitive, while employment growth would be served with allowing for
|
||||
|
||||
some appreciation of the currency. In the case of negotiated,
|
||||
|
||||
multilateral trade liberalization the nature of the exchange rate regime
|
||||
|
||||
does not appear to matter for Uruguay in order to reap the gains from
|
||||
|
||||
trade. World market prices would move in favour of Uruguay''s exports,
|
||||
|
||||
particularly under a WTO scenario that would benefit its agricultural
|
||||
|
||||
exports. Unskilled workers would be the principal beneficiaries of such
|
||||
|
||||
a scenario and poverty and inequality would be reduced. It seems to
|
||||
|
||||
confirm Uruguay''s paradoxical relationship with trade integration.
|
||||
|
||||
Mercosur brought both trade benefits and greater vulnerability to the
|
||||
|
||||
volatility of the economies of its large neighbours, Argentina and
|
||||
|
||||
Brazil, while WTO equally would bring trade gains but enhance the
|
||||
|
||||
country''s vulnerability to the volatility in primary commodity markets.'
|
||||
affiliation: 'Laens, S (Corresponding Author), CINVE, Montevideo, Uruguay.
|
||||
|
||||
Laens, Silvia; Perera, Marcelo, CINVE, Montevideo, Uruguay.'
|
||||
author: Laens, Silvia and Perera, Marcelo
|
||||
author_list:
|
||||
- family: Laens
|
||||
given: Silvia
|
||||
- family: Perera
|
||||
given: Marcelo
|
||||
booktitle: 'WHO GAINS FROM FREE TRADE: EXPORT-LED GROWTH, INEQUALITY AND POVERTY IN
|
||||
|
||||
LATIN AMERICA'
|
||||
da: '2023-09-28'
|
||||
editor: Vos, R and Ganuza, E and Morley, S and Robinson, S
|
||||
files: []
|
||||
isbn: 978-0-203-96583-2
|
||||
language: English
|
||||
number-of-cited-references: '21'
|
||||
pages: 361-392
|
||||
papis_id: 9b450d588204d90f1a09e2950b34ad5b
|
||||
ref: Laens2006uruguayexport
|
||||
series: Routledge Studies in Development Economics
|
||||
times-cited: '0'
|
||||
title: Uruguay - export growth, poverty and income distribution
|
||||
type: Article; Book Chapter
|
||||
unique-id: WOS:000278891300013
|
||||
usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
|
||||
usage-count-since-2013: '4'
|
||||
volume: '50'
|
||||
web-of-science-categories: Economics
|
||||
year: '2006'
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue