Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/14ba127c085866d8975caf492c087f16-sakamoto-takayuki/info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+abstract: 'Scholars and policymakers who call for social investment (SI) policies
+
+  hope that SI policies reduce income inequality and poverty, among other
+
+  policy goals. Meanwhile, some others point out potentially less pro-poor
+
+  effects of SI policies. There are relatively few cross-national studies
+
+  that empirically examine the distributional effects of SI policies. The
+
+  current study seeks to fill the gap by investigating the effects of SI
+
+  policies on income inequality in OECD countries. The empirical analysis
+
+  finds mixed results. Parental leave benefits reduce market income
+
+  inequality, but other family support policies do not lessen inequality,
+
+  and family allowances and paid leave (the length of generous leave) even
+
+  increase it. The effects of some family policies are partly
+
+  context-specific. In contexts where there are a large number of
+
+  single-mother households, parental leave benefits reduce market income
+
+  inequality. There is no stable evidence that education and active labour
+
+  market policy (ALMP) reduce market income inequality. Education and
+
+  ALMP, however, reduce disposable income inequality (even after
+
+  controlling for left governments and Nordic countries). The article
+
+  suggests that in countries with high education and/or ALMP spending, the
+
+  skills of workers towards the lower end of the income distribution may
+
+  be relatively high (even though their pre-tax and transfer income may be
+
+  low), and it may make their income salvageable with redistributive
+
+  policies. In this sense, SI policies and conventional redistributive
+
+  policies may be complementary in reducing disposable income inequality.'
+affiliation: 'Sakamoto, T (Corresponding Author), Meiji Gakuin Univ, Fac Int Studies,
+  Totsuka Ku, 1518 Kamikuratacho, Yokohama, Kanagawa 1088636, Japan.
+
+  Sakamoto, Takayuki, Meiji Gakuin Univ, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.'
+article-number: 09589287211018146
+author: Sakamoto, Takayuki
+author-email: halosakamoto@gmail.com
+author_list:
+- family: Sakamoto
+  given: Takayuki
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1177/09589287211018146
+earlyaccessdate: JUL 2021
+eissn: 1461-7269
+files: []
+issn: 0958-9287
+journal: JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY
+keywords: 'Active labour market policy; education; family support; income
+
+  inequality; industrial democracies; social investment policy; welfare
+
+  states'
+keywords-plus: '18 OECD COUNTRIES; FAMILY POLICIES; POVERTY; REDISTRIBUTION; EMPLOYMENT;
+
+  GROWTH'
+language: English
+month: OCT
+number: '4'
+number-of-cited-references: '41'
+orcid-numbers: Sakamoto, Takayuki/0000-0002-6810-5322
+pages: 440-456
+papis_id: 379ff2121ed2a2247c87000f3976d8d5
+ref: Sakamoto2021dosocial
+researcherid-numbers: Sakamoto, Takayuki/A-9159-2009
+times-cited: '4'
+title: Do social investment policies reduce income inequality? An analysis of industrial
+  countries
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000675798000001
+usage-count-last-180-days: '2'
+usage-count-since-2013: '18'
+volume: '31'
+web-of-science-categories: Public Administration; Social Issues
+year: '2021'