Add wos sample results library

02-data/intermediate/wos_sample/0d9bec190fb43c6438bcfa09bf7441aa-schmidt-andrea-e./info.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+abstract: 'Older people of lower socioeconomic status (SES) are disproportionately
+
+  affected by chronic conditions, yet less able to compensate health
+
+  limitations through use of formal long-term care (LTC) at home, a
+
+  preferred type of care for most. Some, like older women and single
+
+  people, are particularly vulnerable. Under the Austrian public
+
+  cash-for-care scheme, which aims to incentivise care at home and
+
+  empowerment of LTC users, this study analyses: (i) interdependencies
+
+  between SES, gender and informal'' or family care, and (ii) how these
+
+  factors associate with the use of old age formal home care in Vienna. An
+
+  adaptation of Arber and Ginn''s theory is used to identify material
+
+  resources (income), health resources (care needs) and informal caring
+
+  resources (co-residence and/or availability of family care). Gender
+
+  aspects are also considered as a persistent source of inequalities.
+
+  Administrative and survey data, collected by public authorities between
+
+  2010 and 2012 in Vienna, serve to compare home care use in old age (60+)
+
+  to other support forms (residential and informal care) using logistic
+
+  regression analysis. Results show a pro-rich bias in home care use among
+
+  single-living people, with high-income single people being less likely
+
+  to move to a care home, while there are no significant income
+
+  differences present for non-singles. Second, traditional gender roles
+
+  are salient: female care recipients co-residing with a partner are more
+
+  likely to use formal care than men, reflecting that men''s traditional
+
+  gender roles involve less unpaid care work than women''s. In conclusion,
+
+  in an urban setting, the Austrian cash-for-care scheme is likely to
+
+  reinforce stratifications along gender and class, thus implementing the
+
+  general policy objective of care at home, but more likely for those with
+
+  higher income. A support mechanism promoting empowerment among all older
+
+  people might contribute to unequal degrees of choice, especially for
+
+  those with fewer resources to manage their way through a fragmented
+
+  system of LTC delivery.'
+affiliation: 'Schmidt, AE (Corresponding Author), European Ctr Social Welf Policy
+  \& Res, Vienna, Austria.
+
+  Schmidt, AE (Corresponding Author), Berggasse 17, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
+
+  Schmidt, Andrea E., European Ctr Social Welf Policy \& Res, Vienna, Austria.'
+author: Schmidt, Andrea E.
+author-email: schmidt@euro.centre.org
+author_list:
+- family: Schmidt
+  given: Andrea E.
+da: '2023-09-28'
+doi: 10.1111/hsc.12334
+eissn: 1365-2524
+files: []
+issn: 0966-0410
+journal: HEALTH \& SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY
+keywords: Austria; cash benefit; gender; home care; inequalities; old age
+keywords-plus: 'LONG-TERM-CARE; WELFARE-STATE; INFORMAL CARE; HEALTH-CARE; FAMILY;
+  HELP;
+
+  SERVICES; AUSTRIA; SUPPORT; EUROPE'
+language: English
+month: MAR
+number: '2'
+number-of-cited-references: '65'
+orcid-numbers: SCHMIDT, Andrea/0000-0002-1408-321X
+pages: 514-526
+papis_id: a3ea08e70ec767d8947ecfea984885a1
+ref: Schmidt2017analysingimportance
+times-cited: '17'
+title: 'Analysing the importance of older people''s resources for the use of home
+  care in a cash-for-care scheme: evidence from Vienna'
+type: Article
+unique-id: WOS:000394976600021
+usage-count-last-180-days: '1'
+usage-count-since-2013: '17'
+volume: '25'
+web-of-science-categories: Public, Environmental \& Occupational Health; Social Work
+year: '2017'