From 0056341fc8b77f56b47f8a3f6553f31247121662 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marty Oehme Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 15:48:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] feat(notes): Prepare meeting notes 09 Feb 24 --- 03-documentation/meeting_2024-01-26.md | 6 +++--- 03-documentation/meeting_2024-02-09.md | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 03-documentation/meeting_2024-02-09.md diff --git a/03-documentation/meeting_2024-01-26.md b/03-documentation/meeting_2024-01-26.md index f4ee86f..6979f2d 100644 --- a/03-documentation/meeting_2024-01-26.md +++ b/03-documentation/meeting_2024-01-26.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Meeting Miguel 2024-01-26 achieved: -- [ ] before end of year: +- [x] before end of year: - hammered out a preliminary state of the art - we have a synthesis that roughly follows our framework @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ achieved: - table reviewing main findings and strength of evidence - screen the remaining 200 studies - improve the writing on the synthesis itself - - to adhere a little closer to + - to adhere a little closer to framework categorization - [ ] questions: - large segment of 'model-only' studies, mostly from macroeconomics - they do not form part of our main extracted sample pool @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ spatial inequality ## TODO -- [ ] sort synthesis closer to framework +- [x] sort synthesis closer to framework - [ ] create main findings table - [ ] extract as much as possible - create external (representativeness) / internal (strength of method) validity viz diff --git a/03-documentation/meeting_2024-02-09.md b/03-documentation/meeting_2024-02-09.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1b00f2d --- /dev/null +++ b/03-documentation/meeting_2024-02-09.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +# Meeting Miguel 2024-02-09 + +achieved: + +- [ ] studies screened + +- [ ] focus now: + - table reviewing main findings and strength of evidence + - screen the remaining 200 studies + - improve the writing on the synthesis itself + - to adhere a little closer to + +- [ ] questions: + - logistical: + - create extraction matrices with main/statistical findings + - are we going to put those in the main Appendix? + or do we just pass on the CSV extraction as the data? + - is there a specific length I am going for for the end result? + - is it fine if for now I leave intro/conclusion more vague to fit in with rest of the document + - writing: + - categories overlap sometimes, of course + - a study on NREGS in India which has minimum wage effects as primary channel + - a study on vocational training which fuses it with workfare program (ALMP) + +- [ ] TODO + - main findings table still remaining + - write it out + - shorten?