1. Hegewisch A, Gornick JC. The impact of work-family policies on women’s employment: a review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family. 2011;14(2):119-138.
2. Burtle A, Bezruchka S. Population health and paid parental leave: what the United States can learn from two decades of research. Paper presented at: Healthcare 2016.
3. Rossin-Slater M, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J. The effects of California’s paid family leave program on mothers’ leave-taking and subsequent labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2013;32(2):224-245.
4. Borrell C, Palencia L, Muntaner C, Urquia M, Malmusi D, O’Campo P. Influence of macrosocial policies on women’s health and gender inequalities in health. Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36: 31-48.
5. Alio AP, Bond MJ, Padilla YC, Heidelbaugh JJ, Lu M, Parker WJ. Addressing policy barriers to paternal involvement during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J. 2011;15(4):425-430.
6. Aitken Z, Garrett CC, Hewitt B, Keogh L, Hocking JS, Kavanagh AM. The maternal health outcomes of paid maternity leave: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2015;130:32-41.
7. O’Brien M. Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: international perspectives and policy impact. Ann Am Acad Polit SS. 2009;624:190-213.
8. Heymann J, Rho HJ, Schmitt J, Earle A. Ensuring a healthy and productive workforce: comparing the generosity of paid sick day and sick leave policies in 22 countries. Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(1):1-22.
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.
10. Ulker A, Guven C. Determinants of maternity leave duration in Australia: evidence from the HILDA survey. Econ Rec. 2011;87(278):399-413.
11. Baird M, Litwin AS. Rethinking work and family policy: the making and taking of parental leave in Australia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005;17(5):385-400.
12. Baum CL, Ruhm CJ. The effects of paid family leave in California on labor market outcomes. J Policy Anal Manage. 2016;35(2):333356. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21894.
13. Raabe PH, Theall KP. An analysis of paid family and sick leave advocacy in Louisiana: lessons learned. Womens Health Issues. 2016;26(5):488-495.
14. Baker M, Milligan K. How does job-protected maternity leave affect mothers’ employment? J Labor Econ. 2008;26(4):655-691. WORLD Policy Analysis Center. OECD Adult Labor Database. 2016. https://www.worldpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/ WORLD%20Report%20-%20Parental%20Leave%20OECD% 20Country%20Approaches_0.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2018.
15. Berger LM, Hill J, Waldfogel J. Maternity leave, early maternal employment and child health and development in the US. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F29-F47.
16. Huang R, Yang MZ. Paid maternity leave and breastfeeding practice before and after California’s implementation of the nation’s first paid family leave program. Econ Hum Biol. 2015;16:45-59.
18. Escot L, Fernandez-Cornejo JA, Poza C. Fathers’ use of childbirth leave in Spain: the effects of the 13-day paternity leave. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2014;33(3):419-453.
19. Cools S, Fiva JH, Kirkeboen LJ. Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. Scand J Econ. 2015;117(3):801-828.
20. Ekberg J, Eriksson R, Friebel G. Parental leave—a policy evaluation of the Swedish “daddy-month” reform. J Public Econ. 2013;97:131-143.
21. Bunning M. What happens after the ‘daddy months’? Fathers’ involvement in paid work, childcare, and housework after taking parental leave in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2015;31(6): 738-748.
22. Lidwall U. Termination of sickness benefits or transition to disability pension after changes in sickness insurance: a Swedish register study. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(2):118-124.
23. Lidwall U, Marklund S. Trends in long-term sickness absence in Sweden, 1992–2008: the role of economic conditions, legislation, demography, work environment and alcohol consumption. Int J Soc Welf. 2011;20(2):167-179.
24. Hägglund P. Do time limits in the sickness insurance system increase return to work? Empir Econ. 2013;45(1):567-582.
25. Arrelov B, Borgquist L, Ljungberg D, Svardsudd K. The influence of change of legislation concerning sickness absence on physicians’ performance as certifiers: a population-based study. Health Policy. 2003;63(3):259-268.
26. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Sickness benefit cuts mainly affect bluecollar workers. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(6):497-503.
27. Aaviksoo E, Kiivet RA. Influence of the sickness benefit reform on sickness absence. Health Policy. 2016;120(9):1070-1078.
28. De Paola M, Scoppa V, Pupo V. Absenteeism in the Italian public sector: the effects of changes in sick leave policy. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):337-360.
29. Kausto J, Viikari-Juntura E, Virta LJ, Gould R, Koskinen A, Solovieva S. Effectiveness of new legislation on partial sickness benefit on work participation: a quasi-experiment in Finland. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e006685.
30. Kausto J, Miranda H, Martimo KP, Viikari-Juntura E. Partial sick leave: review of its use, effects and feasibility in the Nordic countries. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34(4):239249.
31. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. The effects of expanding the generosity of the statutory sickness insurance system. J Appl Econ. 2014;29(2):208-230.
32. Ziebarth NR, Karlsson M. A natural experiment on sick pay cuts, sickness absence, and labor costs. J Public Econ. 2010;94(11):1108-1122.
33. Fevang E, Markussen S, Røed K. The sick pay trap. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(2):305-336.
34. Schuster MA, Chung PJ, Elliott MN, Garfield CF, Vestal KD, Klein DJ. Awareness and use of California’s Paid Family Leave Insurance among parents of chronically ill children. JAMA. 2008;300(9):1047-1055.
35. Baum CL. The effect of state maternity leave legislation and the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act on employment and wages. Labour Econ. 2003;10(5):573-596.
36. Goodpaster NK. Leaves and leaving: the Family and Medical Leave Act and the decline in maternal labor force participation. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1).
37. Han WJ, Waldfogel J. Parental leave: the impact of recent legislation on parents’ leave taking. Demography. 2003;40(1):191-200.
38. Rossin M. The effects of maternity leave on children’s birth and infant health outcomes in the United States. J Health Econ. 2011;30(2):221-239.
39. Schott W. Going back part-time: family leave legislation and women’s return to work. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2012;31(1):1-30.
40. Hofferth SL, Curtin SC. Parental leave statutes and maternal return to work after childbirth in the United States. Work Occup. 2006;33(1):73-105.
41. Waldfogel J. The impact of the Family and Medical Leave Act. J Policy Anal Manage. 1999;18(2):281-302.
42. Baum CL. The effects of maternity leave legislation on mothers’ labor supply after childbirth. South Econ J. 2003;69(4):772-799.
43. Waldfogel J. Family leave coverage in the 1990s. Mon Labor Rev. 1999;122(10):13-21.
44. Washbrook E, Ruhm CJ, Waldfogel J, Han W-J. Public policies, women’s employment after childbearing, and child well-being. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2011;11(1).
45. Stoddard C, Stock WA, Hogenson E. The impact of maternity leave laws on cesarean delivery. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2016;16(1).
46. Shim J. Family leave policy and child mortality: evidence from 19 OECD countries from 1969 to 2010. Int J Soc Welf. 2016;25(3):215-221.
47. Tanaka S. Parental leave and child health across OECD countries. Econ J (London). 2005;115(501):F7-F28.
48. Ruhm CJ. Parental leave and child health. J Health Econ. 2000;19(6):931-960.
49. Schober PS. Parental leave and domestic work of mothers and fathers: a longitudinal study of two reforms in West Germany. J Soc Policy. 2014;43(2):351-372.
50. Lapuerta I, Baizán P, González MJ. Individual and institutional constraints: an analysis of parental leave use and duration in Spain. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2011;30(2):185-210.
51. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
52. Dustmann C, Schonberg U. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and children’s long-term outcomes. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2012;4(3):190-224.
53. Rege M, Solli IF. The impact of paternity leave on fathers’ future earnings. Demography. 2013;50(6):2255-2277.
54. Han WJ, Ruhm C, Waldfogel J. Parental leave policies and parents’ employment and leave-taking. J Policy Anal Manage. 2009;28(1):29-54.
55. Pronzato CD. Return to work after childbirth: does parental leave matter in Europe? Rev Econ Househ. 2009;7(4):341-360.
56. Schonberg U, Ludsteck J. Expansions in maternity leave coverage and mothers’ labor market outcomes after childbirth. J Labor Econ. 2014;32(3):469-505.
57. Hanel B. The impact of paid maternity leave rights on labour market outcomes. Econ Rec. 2013;89(286):339-366.
58. Geyer J, Haan P, Wrohlich K. The effects of family policy on maternal labor supply: combining evidence from a structural model and a quasi-experimental approach. Labour Econ. 2015;36: 84-98.
59. Ziefle A, Gangl M. Do women respond to changes in family policy? A quasi-experimental study of the duration of mothers’ employment interruptions in Germany. Eur Sociol Rev. 2014;30(5):562-581.
60. Ronsen M, Sundstrom M. Family policy and after-birth employment among new mothers: a comparison of Finland, Norway and Sweden. Eur J Popul. 2002;18(2):121-152.
61. Hanratty M, Trzcinski E. Who benefits from paid family leave? Impact of expansions in Canadian paid family leave on maternal employment and transfer income. J Popul Econ. 2009;22(3):693711.
62. Matysiak A, Szalma I. Effects of parental leave policies on second birth risks and women’s employment entry. Population. 2014;69(4):599-636.
63. Bergemann A, Riphahn RT. Female labour supply and parental leave benefits—the causal effect of paying higher transfers for a shorter period of time. Appl Econ Lett. 2010;18(1):17-20.
64. Geyer J, Haan P, Spieß CK, Wrohlich K. Das Elterngeld und seine Wirkungen auf das Haushaltseinkommen junger Familien und die Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern [The new German parental leave benefit scheme and its effects on young families’ household income and on mothers’ paid employment]. ZfF–Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2): 193-211.
65. Bujard M, Passet J. Wirkungen des Elterngelds auf Einkommen und Fertilität [Effects of the new German parental leave benefit on income and fertility]. ZfF–Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research. 2013;25(2):212-237.
66. Winegarden CR, Bracy PM. Demographic consequences of maternal-leave programs in industrial countries: evidence from fixed-effects models. South Econ J. 1995;61(4):1020-1035.
67. Brugiavini A, Pasini G, Trevisan E. The direct impact of maternity benefits on leave taking: evidence from complete fertility histories. Adv Life Course Res. 2013;18(1):46-67.
68. Akgunduz YE, Plantenga J. Labour market effects of parental leave in Europe. Cambridge J Econ. 2013;37(4):845-862.
69. Ruhm CJ. The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: lessons from Europe. Q J Econ. 1998;113(1):285-317.
70. Lalive R, Schlosser A, Steinhauer A, Zweimüller J. Parental leave and mothers’ careers: the relative importance of job protection and cash benefits. Rev Econ Stud. 2014;81(1):219-265.
71. Asai Y. Parental leave reforms and the employment of new mothers: quasi-experimental evidence from Japan. Labour Econ. 2015;36:72-83.
72. Waldfogel J. The family gap for young women in the United States and Britain: can maternity leave make a difference? J Labor Econ. 1998;16(3):505-545.
73. Waldfogel J, Higuchi Y, Abe M. Family leave policies and women’s retention after childbirth: evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. J Popul Econ. 1999;12(4):523-545.
74. Kluve J, Tamm M. Parental leave regulations, mothers’ labor force attachment and fathers’ childcare involvement: evidence from a natural experiment. J Popul Econ. 2013;26(3):9831005.
75. Del Boca D, Pasqua S, Pronzato C. Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective. Oxf Econ Pap. 2009;61(Suppl. 1):i147-i171.
76. Mukhopadhyay S. The effects of the 1978 Pregnancy Discrimination Act on female labor supply. Int Econ Rev. 2012;53(4):11331153.
77. Das T, Polachek SW. Unanticipated effects of California’s paid family leave program. Contemp Econ Policy. 2015;33(4):619-635.
78. Lalive R, Zweimuller J. How does parental leave affect fertility and return to work? Evidence from two natural experiments. Q J Econ. 2009;124(3):1363-1402.
79. Joseph O, Pailhe A, Recotillet I, Solaz A. The economic impact of taking short parental leave: evaluation of a French reform. Labour Econ. 2013;25:63-75.
80. Rasmussen AW. Increasing the length of parents’ birth-related leave: the effect on children’s long-term educational outcomes. Labour Econ. 2010;17(1):91-100.
81. Maldonado LC, Nieuwenhuis R. Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978–2008. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(4):395-415.
82. Misra J, Moller S, Strader E, Wemlinger E. Family policies, employment and poverty among partnered and single mothers. Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2012;30(1):113-128.
83. Stier H, Mandel H. Inequality in the family: the institutional aspects of women’s earning contribution. Soc Sci Res. 2009;38(3):594-608.
84. Budig MJ, Misra J, Boeckmann I. Work-family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work Occup. 2016;43(2):119-177.
85. Erhel C, Guergoat-Larivière M. Labor market regimes, family policies, and women’s behavior in the EU. Fem Econ. 2013;19(4):76-109.
86. De Henau J, Meulders D, O’Dorchai S. Maybe baby: comparing partnered women’s employment and child policies in the EU-15. Fem Econ. 2010;16(1):43-77.
87. Pettit B, Hook JL. The structure of women’s employment in comparative perspective. Social Forces. 2005;84(2):779-801.
88. Fuwa M, Cohen PN. Housework and social policy. Soc Sci Res. 2007;36(2):512-530.
89. Hook JL. Gender inequality in the welfare state: sex segregation in housework, 1965–2003. AJS. 2010;115(5):1480-1523.
90. Hook JL. Care in context: men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. Am Soc Rev. 2006;71(4):639-660.
91. Boll C, Leppin J, Reich N. Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: evidence from industrialized countries. Rev Econ Househ. 2014;12(1):129-158.
92. Stearns J. The effects of paid maternity leave: evidence from Temporary Disability Insurance. J Health Econ. 2015;43:85-102.
93. Baker M, Milligan K. Maternal employment, breastfeeding, and health: evidence from maternity leave mandates. J Health Econ. 2008;27(4):871-887.
94. Kottwitz A, Oppermann A, Spiess CK. Parental leave benefits and breastfeeding in Germany: effects of the 2007 reform. Rev Econ Househ. 2016;14(4):859-890.
95. Klevens J, Luo F, Xu L, Peterson C, Latzman NE. Paid family leave’s effect on hospital admissions for pediatric abusive head trauma. Inj Prev. 2016;11:11.
96. Daku M, Raub A, Heymann J. Maternal leave policies and vaccination coverage: a global analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(2):120124.
97. Liu Q, Skans ON. The duration of paid parental leave and children’s scholastic performance. B E J Econ Anal Policy. 2010;10(1):1-35.
98. Baker M, Milligan K. Evidence from maternity leave expansions of the impact of maternal care on early child development. J Hum Resour. 2010;45(1):1-32.
99. Carneiro P, Løken KV, Salvanes KG. A flying start? Maternity leave benefits and long-run outcomes of children. J Polit Econ. 2015;123(2):365-412.
100. Engster D, Stensöta HO. Do family policy regimes matter for children’s well-being? Soc Polit. 2011;18(1):82-124.
101. Avendano M, Berkman LF, Brugiavini A, Pasini G. The long-run effect of maternity leave benefits on mental health: evidence from European countries. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132:45-53.
102. Duvander A-Z, Johansson M. What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use? J Eur Soc Policy. 2012;22(3):319-330.
103. Bünning M, Pollmann-Schult M. Family policies and fathers’ working hours: cross-national differences in the paternal labour supply. Work Employ Soc. 2016;30(2):256-274.
104. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: causal effects of paternity leave. Soc Sci Res. 2011;40(6):1611-1622.
105. Kotsadam A, Finseraas H. Causal effects of parental leave on adolescents’ household work. Social Forces. 2013;92(1):329-351.
106. Rønsen M, Kitterød RH. Gender-equalizing family policies and mothers’ entry into paid work: recent evidence from Norway. Fem Econ. 2015;21(1):59-89.
107. Dale-Olsen H. Sickness absence, sick leave pay, and pay schemes. Labour. 2014;28(1):40-63.
108. Hall C, Hartman L. Moral hazard among the sick and unemployed: evidence from a Swedish social insurance reform. Empir Econ. 2010;39(1):27-50.
109. Henrekson M, Persson M. The effects on sick leave of changes in the sickness insurance system. J Labor Econ. 2004;22(1):87-113.
110. Johansson P, Palme M. Assessing the effect of public policy on worker absenteeism. J Hum Resour. 2002;37(2):381-409.
111. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of a sick pay reform on absence and on health-related outcomes. J Health Econ. 2010;29(2):285-302.
112. Olsson M, Thoursie PS. Sickness insurance and spousal labour supply. Labour Econ. 2015;33:41-54.
113. Ziebarth NR. Long-term absenteeism and moral hazard: evidence from a natural experiment. Labour Econ. 2013;24:277-292.
114. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
115. Thyrian JR, Fendrich K, Lange A, Haas JP, Zygmunt M, Hoffmann W. Changing maternity leave policy: short-term effects on fertility rates and demographic variables in Germany. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(4):672-676.
116. Puhani PA, Sonderhof K. The effects of parental leave extension on training for young women. J Popul Econ. 2011;24(2):731-760.
117. Escobedo A, Wall K. Leave policies in Southern Europe: continuities and changes. Community, Work & Family. 2015;18(2):218235.
118. Milkman R, Appelbaum E. Unfinished Business: Paid Family Leave in California and the Future of US Work-Family Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2013.
